(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(D) Julie Gonzales
(R) Janak Joshi
80%
40%
20%
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Hetal Doshi
50%
40%↓
30%
(D) Jeff Bridges
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
50%↑
40%↓
30%
(D) Diana DeGette*
(D) Wanda James
(D) Milat Kiros
80%
20%
10%↓
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Alex Kelloff
(R) H. Scheppelman
60%↓
40%↓
30%↑
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) E. Laubacher
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
30%↑
20%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Jessica Killin
55%↓
45%↑
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Shannon Bird
(D) Manny Rutinel
45%↓
30%
30%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
On the latest episode of the Get More Smarter Podcast, hosts Jason Bane and Ian Silverii discussed what might be the most impossible paradox in modern American politics:
This question is so difficult, in fact, that we decided to put it to a vote among readers of Colorado Pols.
By now you’ve probably heard the story about South Dakota Republican Gov. Kristi Noem — a theoretical potential choice to be Donald Trump’s running mate — boasting in her memoir about executing a puppy that wasn’t following her training commands. You’ve also no doubt seen the stories about independent Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who quite literally has had part of his brain eaten by a worm.
Here’s the question: All other things being equal, would you prefer a candidate for President (or any elected office, really) who freely admitted to murdering an innocent dog…or a candidate whose brain has been partially eaten by a worm?
There is no third option in this quandary. Again, if everything else was equal, which candidate’s, um, background would be (relatively) easiest to square in your mind?
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Comments