On the latest episode of the Get More Smarter Podcast, hosts Jason Bane and Ian Silverii discussed what might be the most impossible paradox in modern American politics:
This question is so difficult, in fact, that we decided to put it to a vote among readers of Colorado Pols.
By now you’ve probably heard the story about South Dakota Republican Gov. Kristi Noem — a theoretical potential choice to be Donald Trump’s running mate — boasting in her memoir about executing a puppy that wasn’t following her training commands. You’ve also no doubt seen the stories about independent Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who quite literally has had part of his brain eaten by a worm.
Here’s the question: All other things being equal, would you prefer a candidate for President (or any elected office, really) who freely admitted to murdering an innocent dog…or a candidate whose brain has been partially eaten by a worm?
There is no third option in this quandary. Again, if everything else was equal, which candidate’s, um, background would be (relatively) easiest to square in your mind?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Air Slash
IN: J.D. Vance Really, Really Not Going Over Well
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: BREAKING: Restraining Order Stops Dave Williams Ouster Efforts Cold
BY: Air Slash
IN: J.D. Vance Really, Really Not Going Over Well
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Richard Holtorf Jumps Into Colorado GOP Chairmanship Fracas
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: BREAKING: Restraining Order Stops Dave Williams Ouster Efforts Cold
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Richard Holtorf Jumps Into Colorado GOP Chairmanship Fracas
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: J.D. Vance Really, Really Not Going Over Well
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Longtime Colorado Journalist Sanda Fish Retires
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Richard Holtorf Jumps Into Colorado GOP Chairmanship Fracas
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: J.D. Vance Really, Really Not Going Over Well
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Maybe the worm would eat away a bad part of their personality. Anyone who would kill a dog rather then take it to a shelter doesn’t have any “good” tucked away somewhere.
The worm likely was a type looking for its usual diet of pig — and the usual progression of such a worm inside a brain is limited eating, death, and then being surrounded by a cyst.
All in all, it seems like most of us prefer damage from a worm (and possibly, damage from mercury poisoning) over the free choice of dealing with a puppy by shooting it (and then shooting a goat, for good measure, and proving to be incompetent at shooting so there was a need for a second shot on the goat).
This is the definition of a sadistic choice. And after reading JiD’s comment, I went with worm brain.
I know, right? It must have done something for her to kill the dog…she wanted more. It is a good thing none of the kids were in the yard.