Mike Coffman Loves Him Some Aaron Schock Coinage

THURSDAY UPDATE: The Denver Post’s Lynn Bartels follows up:

“We donated the money after Aaron Schock resigned and donated it to a veterans organization. As a matter of principle we don’t respond to fake news websites, nor did we feel a need to trumpet the donation. Sorry to upset the left-wing attack machine so desperate to find a flaw with Mike Coffman,” spokesman Tyler Sandburg said…

The Colorado Democratic Party and the liberal group ProgressNow jumped on the story, with ProgressNow urging Coffman to get rid of the “tainted money.”

The big question left unanswered is, when exactly did Coffman get rid of Aaron Schock’s money? We likely won’t know the answer to that until the next quarterly fundraising reports are filed. Hopefully it wasn’t, you know, yesterday afternoon–which would still technically be “after Schock resigned,” though not exactly what you’d call honest about the timing. Original post follows.


Money? What money?

Tainted money? What tainted money?

As the Colorado Independent’s John Tomasic reports today:

Colorado Congressman Mike Coffman has taken $20,000 since 2008 from disgraced Illinois U.S. Rep. Aaron Schock, a flashy figure who rose fast on the national politics stage only to resign in disgrace last month as a scandal unfolded around the free spending approach he adopted toward taxpayer money.

Schock was known less as a serious legislator than as a prodigious fundraiser. He was elected to office when he was only 27 years old, but he charged hard toward the money from the moment he landed in D.C., wooing big donors and doling out cash to his colleagues through his Generation-Y campaign committee.

Since Schock’s resignation on March 31st, recipients of his political donations have sought to put distance between themselves and Schock by donating or returning the Generation Y contributions.

Rep. David Jolly, a Florida Republican, announced the day after Schock resigned that he was donating $5,000 he received from the Generation-Y fund…

But as of this writing, there’s been no word from Rep. Mike Coffman about what (if anything) he plans to do with the much larger amount he received from disgraced ex-Rep. Aaron Schock’s Generation-Y PAC. It’s worth noting that a similar situation on the Democratic side, donations from Sen. Bob Menendez to Colorado Sen. Michael Bennet back in 2010, was swiftly resolved with the money in question given to charity after Menendez’ indictment.

Liberals in Colorado are demanding no less from Coffman today:

“Mike Coffman took thousands of dollars from Aaron Schock, whose financial improprieties with campaign donations resulted in his resignation from Congress and a grand jury investigation,” said ProgressNow Colorado executive director Amy Runyon-Harms. “Today, fellow Republican lawmakers are returning Schock’s donations, but Coffman has chosen to hold on to his dirty money. We demand Coffman immediately unload the thousands he received from Aaron Schock, or explain to the voters in his district why he is refusing to do so.”

This is a situation where the right choice for Coffman seems obvious: maybe not to return the money to Schock, who has proven he’s not a very good steward of anybody’s money, but a speedy donation to charity is definitely in order. One gets a brief window to do that before the negative press hits, after which you take political damage for failing to distance yourself from the scandal.

Judging from this report, that window is closing fast.

12 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. FrankUnderwood says:

    The Big Question is whether Marine Mike let Aaron Schock redecorate his office to look like Downton Abbey….. Inquiring minds want to know…….

  2. DawnPatrol says:

    Coffman is what he is: a loathsome, hypocritical, beady-eyed slug. And as long as there remains an “R” by his name, his cowardice, lying and hypocrisy will go unchallenged by all the equally hypocritical faux “patriots” who continue to vote for this unctuous little schnook.

    • BlueCat says:

      Yup. And all low info votes will know about him is he’s vet who fights for vets. All his ads will say so. He’ll have no trouble getting reelected absent a great D high profile candidate running a way less stupid campaign than team Romanoff did. If he chooses to go after Bennet’s Senate seat, he’s going to have a good chance of taking it. Bennet would have to shore up support and raise his Colorado profile between now and then. On name rec alone (have I ever heard of this guy?) Coffman would have a head start in Colorado. 

  3. Duke Cox says:

    good word.. “unctuous”..yep..it fits.

  4. Conserv. Head Banger says:

    Ms. Runyon-Harms is getting a little carried away (reference to “dirty money”). There is a difference between mis-use of taxpayer money, as may have occurred with Schock’s office re-decoration. As opposed to campaign contributions that are contributed to campaigns. I’ll offer that Ms. Runyon-Harms needs to come up with a stronger case; unless she is prepared to admit that all campaign contributions are “dirty” in some way.   

    Regards,  C.H.B.

    • Diogenesdemar says:

      Except that all large-denomination campaign contributions are “dirty” in nearly every way.

    • BlueCat says:

      Agree there isn’t a lot of there there. The pols who gave it back just did for PR purposes. So far Coffman has declined. You can fit the 2016 voter who will  be even vaguely aware of any of this in a phone booth. If you could still find one of those.

    • dustpuppy says:

      CHB: Do yourself a favor, and get a life. 

      You are not helping the Republicans with your conservative shit-squat.

      You are sounding exactly like Rand Paul, friend.

      • mamajama55 says:

        Don’t be mean to CHB – he yam who he yam, doesn’t pretend otherwise. And he’s quite a bit more articulate and original a thinker than Rand Paul, even if they do share ideology. CHB is probably much closer to Ayn Rand’s libertarianism than the guy who’s named after her.

        When CHB defends Republicans, he doesn’t try to distract by saying Dems do the same thing, but worse. He doesn’t try to come up with bizarro hypotheticals to show you potential tiny mouseholes in your logic, like Elliot. He doesn’t try to piss everyone off by posting offensive cartoons, like AC, or just repeat talking points, like Moderatus..

        I’d like Coffman to donate the money to charity, a) because he’d have less money to campaign with, and b) because it would show that Coffman gets the concepts of ethical vs. unethical behavior, even if the unethical one is a fellow Republican.

        However, unless fellow Republicans urge him to do so, he’ll be hanging onto the money, which he can legally do.  And we saw how immune Coffman is to embarrassment with his “I misspoke and I apologize” robo-response.

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account

You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.