CO-04 (Special Election)
See Full Big Line
(R) Greg Lopez
(R) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Biden*
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%↓
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
90%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
90%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
(R) Ron Hanks
40%
30%
20%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(R) Deborah Flora
(R) J. Sonnenberg
30%↑
15%↑
10%↓
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Dave Williams
(R) Jeff Crank
50%↓
50%↑
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
90%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) Brittany Pettersen
85%↑
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
(R) Janak Joshi
60%↑
35%↓
30%↑
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
August 07, 2008 05:46 PM UTC
33 Comments
Good for Will but he is not going to break 15%. This is an issue Will understands. Cyanide is bad. OK Will you got that one right. Have you seen his commercial? I can’t figure out if he is acting like a magician and making a new bicycle appear or saying that tantrums should be rewarded?
The other dumb guy running for Congress is Wil Armstrong. One too many shots of Tequila have taken their toll on the heir apparent to his Daddy’s dynasty.
how many different users can you create to say the same lame thing over and over again? What are you on, #15 by now?
Shafroth seems a nice guy. Is there any way he finishes above 20%?
Which Wil or What Will is right about the ad. It makes no sense.
Polis gets accused of being soft on vouchers and Fitz is demonstrably soft on mining. (As well, she has taken PAC money from mining interests and, indirectly, from one of the nuclear industry’s major lobbyists).
As the replacement for Mark Udall, who has been an important voice on the House Natural Resources Committee (the committee charged with overseeing commercial leases of mineral resources on public lands), the mining connections have to be far more disconcerting. In fact, just last month, the Committee’s Democratic majority had to exercise rarely-used emergency powers to block the mining of uranium on lands adjacent to the Grand Canyon. And pressure to mine uranium on Colorado’s public lands will only intensify as the nuclear industry seeks massive expansions.
It’s a shame that organized labor in Colorado has chosen to attack Polis on vouchers while ignoring Fitz-Gerald’s far more disturbing ties to the mining industry.
Who takes PAC money this year is taking the risk of opening themselves up to negative campaign ads from their opponents in the primaries and the general election. Fitz-Gerald taking mining PAC money? Polis should run an ad with Al Pacino in the Godfather II: “You broke my heart Fredo!”
i loved it when the UAW came out full steam ahead for drilling ANWR
“If you’re hungry and out of work, eat an environmentalist.”
you’re not the bumper sticker type!
Don’t roll with pigs, I mean Polis and Fitz-Gerald, in the mud. You’ll just get dirty, and they happen to enjoy it…
as long as it is about policy, honest and not personal.
This is a policy difference, there is no misstatement and it is not personal.
Shafroth is fine here
This issue is now in it’s third day of media cycle. I assume JP will drop an ad about this starting tomorrow around 3p (too late for JFG to respond on TV until Monday PM), and JFG is silent. I honestly don’t understand what she is thinking.
so she’s thinking that ignoring it is the best (only) defense. Mary Alice tried the “it was not tied to any specific project” defense and that went over like a led zeppelin. What else can Joan say? Give the long-winded “context” explanation that Repub 36 tried? That’ll go over well on the nightly snooze….
(And oh, by the way, Jared hates cyanide mining with passion, fervor and dedication and as our Rep he would stop at nothing to halt this destructive practice and he calls on Joan to make the same pledge.)
1. Defend it on stronger grounds than “there were no mines planned at the time”. Perhaps tie in jobs somehow? Or just say we need gold mining and tough, this is the best technology we’ve got (which isn’t true and sounds awful).
2. Say she’s changed her mind since then (too late for that now).
3. Change the subject. Hey, how about that Polis ad that claims the 527 attacks were launched by Joan! Look over there!!!
I dunno. She’s kind of cornered. She wasn’t getting a lot of enviro votes anyway, but now she’s getting none.
This has become the main topic as we enter the last week. Not good for her. I think Jared had it regardless but this all but guarantees it.
No-one’s answered about better alternatives.
that do not use cyanide. Here’s an excellent resource from a trustworthy group:
http://www.serconline.org/mini…
I’m going to take it with a grain of salt since one of their claims is essentially that we wouldn’t need to mine gold at all if the world gave up its gold reserves…
However, it does list two processes at the end. One, the Haber Gold Process, appears to be in early production – post-dating Joan’s comments. The other, a biocatalytic, appears to be even newer. Both are proprietary and there is little outside of company promotional material (and press releases picked up by news media) to recommend them.
If we’re to ban cyanide in mining, these processes must gain wider acceptance.
but that doesn’t mean that it’s the only technology. The others are more expensive b/c their extraction percentages are lower. But allowing cyanide leaching on those grounds is like granting CA and FL strawberry growers exceptions to the methyl bromide ban because the pesticide alternatives were more expensive. At a certain point you make a policy decision that the tradeoff of more expensive gold/strawberries for enhanced environmental protection is worth it. Or you don’t. Either way, it’s a policy choice to be made.
But it’s pretty close. Mechanical extraction is only good in high-grade ores. Mercury extraction is worse than cyanide extraction.
As BoulderDem’s link points out (while trying to blame the process), industry self-regulation is the biggest problem. The size of the refining heaps and the lack of oversight makes for big disasters when they happen – kind of like nuclear technology…
not the enviro ones
http://www.mine-engineer.com/m…
see the last para. He doesn’t detail them but lists some alternatives. Also, see pages like
http://www.e-goldprospecting.c…
But none of that was in Joan’s letter. Looking at the letter in the context of why she sent it and what she was trying to accomplish doesn’t look that good for her.
…that it took this long for a “startling” policy difference to emerge.
It only takes about 2 hours of online research to run into Fitz’s ties to the mining industry. And there is a plethora of policy differences that can be exploited:
1) support for cyanide leaching.
2) support from a company with documented human rights abuses in Indonesia.
3) clandestine ties to the uranium mining and the nuclear industry.
4) failure to co-sponsor or support mining restrictions in the state senate until their passage was all but assured.
Follow the money to find the motivation. This stuff should have been issue #1 well before all the early voting started.
Suddenly (as of yesterday) you are a big contributor to Pols and have blogged yourself to death in the last 24 hours as if you are the newly annoited czar and “know it all” energy expert.
Take a breath, or a hike, which ever comes sooner.
I’m sorry…I didn’t realize that this was your little clique and it was only open to the “cool kids”.
Where was I? Researching for an article on the life-cycle carbon costs of nuclear energy and researching future water consumption of thermoelectric generation for a book. Yesterday I was stuck at home with a sinus infection and had the time to contribute because, I dunno, I was under the mistaken impression that this was a public forum for discussion among folks interested in Colorado politics.
Instead apparently it’s just a den of partisan vipers stuck in a echo chamber of their own devise and bent on launching cynical and petty insults at each other in a feeble attempt to make themselves feel important and newcomers unwelcome.
My bad.
I already blasted you for claiming those “clandestine” ties to nuclear.
http://www.coloradopols.com/sh…
I don’t favor Joan in any way and hope she loses (along with Jared), but your “clandestine” ties charge without proof are lame. If you have the proof, post it. She’s been avowedly anti-nuclear in this campaign so giving us some actual material to show a contradiction there would be great. Saying that because some nuclear lobbyist (among many others) gave to a PAC and that PAC gave to Joan (among many others) proves nothing.
Proof?? Of the tie to nuclear?
You apparently are already aware of it. But I will repeat what you already know (and I already posted) anyway:
JFG has taken PAC money from Freeport-McMoran, the world’s largest publicly traded copper and gold mining company, with operations in North America and Indonesia. In 2003, the company admitted paying nearly $20 million to the Indonesian military to keep native landowners away from lands the company mines under contracts with Indonesia’s Islamic government.
Since the 2000 election cycle, Freeport-McMoran’s political action committee has received nearly $10,000 in contributions from J. Bennett Johnson, the former Louisiana Senator most known for authoring the bill designating Yucca Mountain the nation’s nuclear waste repository. Johnson left the Senate in 1997 to launch the Washington, DC-based lobby shop Johnson & Associates (now Steptoe & Johnson), whose biggest clients include Constellation Energy, which operates five nuclear reactors in the Unites States and Battelle, the international science and tech. firm with nuclear technology interests scattered around the globe.
Am I charging that there is a quid pro quo? No. Nor will you ever find any post from me making that charge.
But one has to wonder what one of the nuclear industry’s top lobbyist expects for the thousands of dollars he has funneled through Freeport-McMoran’s political action committee to Fitz-Gerald’s campaign. What is the connection between Steptoe & Johnson and Freeport-McMoran (& Joan Fitz-Gerald).
This is why it’s unseemly to take PAC money (money that exists soley for the purpose of influencing elected officials). It isn’t MY job to explain the connection. It’s Joan’s.
It’s 3 degress of seperation.
And knew that the Renaissance of your technology depends on access to the immense store of uranium under Colorado (Uranium deposits are widely spaced throughout the Front Range, including in Larimer, Gilpin, Clear Creek and Boulder), how would YOU contribute?
This is the problem with taking PAC money. No amount of disclosure will bring to light all the real connections between elected officials and special interests. There are a zillion ways to hide those connections through “3 degrees of separation”.
to ask JFG to explain her views on uranium mining.
She has publicly opposed nuclear power (the merits of which is a seperate issue), but she is recieving money from a gold and uranium mining company. Why?
While not dispositive, it begs more questions.
let’s ask her. Joan? Mary Alice? Uranium? For it or a’gin it?
I’d love nothing more than to be able to widely publicize that Joan is taking uranium money, but you’re not proving that.
Let’s spin it another way. A different candidate takes $$ from a PAC of a well-known and well-respected national enviro group. That same enviro group gets 0.01% of its annual donations from a well-known international soft drink bottler. That bottler gets trashed sometimes for 3rd-world labor practices (or make it clean water issues, I don’t care). So the link between our candidate and bad 3rd-world labor practices (or clean water problems) is right there, people!! Don’t you see it??
We all post on ColoradoPols. OMG – we’re all McCain supporters.
Joan receives PAC money directly from Freeport-McMoran’s PAC. So at least she knows that this is money from a company with questionable human rights practices, directly supporting the Indonesian military in the suppression of local landowners.
So question #1 – what does a company with this kind of agenda (gold before human rights) want with Joan?
Also, so where does this PAC get its money. Well, a lot comes from contributions from folks with an economic interest in the company, company execs, etc. But almost $10,000 comes from the nuclear industry’s top lobbyist and the guy who proposed that Yucca Mountain be the nation’s nuclear repository.
So question #2 – What is J. Bennett Johnson’s interest in Freeport-McMoran? Why is he providing money leftover from his Senate campaign committee to a gold mining company?
(Now, if you know that gold mines are also uranium mines, the link becomes pretty obvious…especially if you also know that the renaissance of the nuclear industry hinges on it getting access to domestic sources of uranium and you also know that the 3rd largest store of domestic uranium lies underneath the Front Range.)
It doesn’t take a conspiracy theorist to understand the very real motivations for the nuclear industry to support the candidate who is apparently in the pocket of the state’s mining interests.