BREAKING: Ted Harvey New Exec. Director of Colorado GOP

Former Sen. Ted Harvey (R).

Former Sen. Ted Harvey (R-Douglas County) will be the new Executive Director of the State Republican Party.

Colorado Republicans today selected former Adams County Republican Party Chair Steve House to replace Ryan Call as State Republican Party Chair (this outcome was first predicted by Colorado Pols on Thursday).

As part of the State Party reorganization, Republicans intend to change their bylaws so that Party Chair is no longer a full-time salaried position (which was how the GOP used to operate before making the Dick Wadhams exception last decade). This means that the top full-time job with the Republican Party will revert back to the role of Executive Director…which is apparently going to be filled by former State Sen. Ted Harvey.

Harvey has been telling folks at today’s Republican reorganization meeting that he will assume the role of Executive Director as soon as Monday. Harvey is an interesting choice, to say the least; he is a somewhat polarizing figure among Republicans who has been recently working to raise money for the controversial “Scam PAC” Stop Hillary PAC. We’ll have more to say about that in the coming days.

We’ll update as we learn more, but as always, you heard it here first.

22 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. ElliotFladen says:

    House says it isn’t true on my Fb page

  2. Voyageur says:

    As a
    Democrat, I’m rooting for Harvey.

  3. jraiffie says:

    Do you all see this as an advantage if Harvey is named Ex Dir?

  4. mamajama55 says:

    Looking in from outside, this seems like a pragmatic decision. They chose the guy who’s really good at raising money (even if he keeps most of it), by any means necessary, over the ideologically pure guy.

    Personally, I think the any-means-necessary guy may cost the GOP more in legal fees than they would gain in revenues, but hey. there’s plenty of popcorn for all.

  5. CDW says:

    Breaking news?  Breaking news is that michael bennet sign on with bob corker to require senate approval of any Iran deal. 

    I cannot describe how angry this makes me.   I’ll say this: I will vote for a republican before I vote for any ticket that has Bennet’s name on it.  At least the republicans have the guts to stand up for what they believe.  And I guess Bennet does too now that I think about it, but I he’s on the wrong side of the aisle.

    • mamajama55 says:

      cdw, I’m no Bennet fan, but I don’t think he signed onto the Iran letter. No Dems did.

      • Progressicat says:

        Not that.  This thing.

        Even if the deal isn’t formalized into a treaty, which the Senate must advise and consent to, the Senate (including these rebellious Dems) wants to be able to scuttle it.  Senator Bennet felt signing on wasn’t enough and became a cosponsor.  Because that’s how he do, I guess.

        It will be interesting to see what Congress does when every other country lifts sanctions on Iran and ours become relatively meaningless.

        • mamajama55 says:

          So Congress refuses to debate whether to grant the President War Powers. Won’t touch it with a 10-foot pole – putting specific war powers in writing would limit the grandstanding and chickenhawk parade opportunities, as well as allow them to keep squawking about “overreach”, while they resolutely fail to grasp what is offered to them within their own reach.

          Yet they want to have review powers over any nuclear deal, and keep sanctions on Iran. Why? Distrust of Obama? Do they imagine that they understand the energy and military poltics of Iran better than the negotiators? Actual genuine support for the pro-Democracy movement in Iran?

          They should just allow the negotiations to continue. If a deal is reached, then is the time to critique that deal, refuse to advise and consent, etc.

          I’m baffled by this.

          Someone please explain to me WTF is in this for Bennet.

    • Gilpin Guy says:

      CDW – Bennet blows on a lot of issues but he is fine on a lot of others.  I would think that since the Senate has to ratify any treaty so it seems like a no brainer that they be involved in any final deal with Iran and the other nations (Germany, France, Russia and China). 

      • Actually not so. The deal itself is a UN Nuclear Anti-proliferation agreement – it’s with the UN, not with the US.

        The US Congress obviously has a part to play, in that we have Congressionally passed sanctions. But as I understand it, the President has enough authority to fulfil our end of a deal for a number of years before requiring Congressional action to loosen the sanctions.

    • FrankUnderwood says:

      Maybe Mikey is preparing to pull a Nighthorse Campbell. 

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account

You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.