CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese



President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump



CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*


CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*


CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks




CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg




CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Dave Williams



CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*


CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen



CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi




State Senate Majority See Full Big Line





State House Majority See Full Big Line





Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 17, 2015 02:07 PM UTC

Columbia Journalism Review Slams Local Media For Ignoring SuperPAC Coordination Guilty Plea Story

  • by: Colorado Pols

UPDATE: Finally, some local coverage–The Durango Herald's Peter Marcus reports this evening:

Tyler Harber, 34, pled guilty on Feb. 12 to coordinated federal election contributions and to making false statements to the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding the case. Sentencing is scheduled for June 5. He faces a maximum of sentence of five years in prison for each count.

Harber served as executive director of the Colorado Republican Party’s recently-formed Super PAC, or independent expenditure committee, until the party terminated its contract with Harber shortly after the November election.

“We all sometimes make mistakes and put our faith in folks who perhaps we shouldn’t,” said Ryan Call, chairman of the Colorado Republican Party, who appointed Harber.

Call described the decision to end the contract with Harber as a desire by the party to simply head in another direction….

And to think, last August this thing was Ryan Call's "brain child." 


Colorado GOP chairman Ryan Call.
Colorado GOP chairman Ryan Call.

We wrote last week about a guilty plea in a Virginia federal court by one Tyler Harber, a Republican campaign consultant, to charges of illegal coordination between a congressional campaign he worked for and a "SuperPAC" he helped create that received hundreds of thousands of dollars to attack his campaign's opponent. Harber's SuperPAC coordination guilty plea is of particular interest to Colorado political observers, as Harber is a friend of Colorado GOP chairman Ryan Call–and a key consultant for the Colorado Republican Party's own "uncoordinated" SuperPAC.

But as Corey Hutchins of the prestigious Columbia Journalism Review reports, local media didn't think any of this merited news coverage. From his story, titled "Colorado journalists miss local angle in super PAC case":

Here’s why this matters. In Citizens United and other cases in recent years, the US Supreme Court has relaxed many of the rules surrounding campaign finance, with the result that outside groups like super PACs can raise and spend unlimited amounts to help or oppose a candidate. One of the remaining restrictions is that outside groups and official candidate campaigns can’t coordinate their efforts—but politicos have found novel ways to get around that rule. And the Federal Elections Commission, which is in charge of regulating such behavior, is gridlocked along partisan lines and hasn’t been able to agree on how to respond.

So, the fact that federal prosecutors have decided to get involved, and that they actually busted someone, is a fairly big deal.

At the same time, campaign finance can be arcane stuff, and the congressional campaign in question was in Viriginia. In many states, the news likely didn’t find a spot in the local, or even national, sections of the daily newspaper. 

But in Colorado, it should have. Tyler Harber, the man at the center of this story, was the person tapped last year by the state Republican Party to head up an independent expenditure committee—akin to a super PAC, though the party doesn’t use that term—with ties to the state GOP last year. [Pols emphasis]

Last year, the Colorado Republican Party was forced to defend the creation of the Colorado CORE independent expenditure committee from a lawsuit by Colorado Ethics Watch, who argued sensibly that "a political committee cannot be ‘independent’ and controlled by a political party at the same time." A judge later ruled that the party could set up an "independent" expenditure committee, since the Colorado Republican Party's internal rules appeared to safeguard against such coordination. From that decision:

CEW…argues that the IEC coordinates with CRP because Chairman Call and other agents and representatives of CRP will be soliciting contributions to the IEC, but offers no evidence in support of this allegation. CEW admits that the IEC’s Standing Rules require that, beyond the initial appointment of the Executive director and management committee members, the management and development of any plans, projects, expenditures, or activities of the IEC will be conducted independent of any CRP official or staff member, including the State Chairman. CEW believes, but has offered no evidence that the IEC will, in the future, not abide by its own rules. [Pols emphasis]

Well, folks? Would you say a guilty plea to the charge of coordination by the executive director of the Colorado independent expenditure committee might have given this judge pause?

Naturally, Colorado GOP chairman Ryan Call, locked in a tight battle for re-election, sees no problem:

In a phone call, Call said Harber is no longer involved with the state party or its independent expenditure committee—and that anything the consultant did in another state is no more relevant here than if Call was given a traffic ticket while driving through Washington, DC.

A…traffic ticket? Seriously? Illegal coordination of donations between the "hard" and "soft" sides of political spending is at the heart of Harber's guilty plea. It's exactly what Ethics Watch sued the Colorado Republican Party over in response to their formation of this "independent" expenditure committee. Call's dismissal is laughable with these facts in view–and yet we have to assume that it was enough to deter local reporters. After all, there's no story.

Hutchins reports that most local reporters didn't even respond to the CJR's queries. One who did answer, AP's Nicholas Riccardi, actually claimed that "people here in general don’t seem very interested in the ins and outs of political maneuvering and machinery as they are in other states." Well hey, what the hell do we have political reporters for at all then? Isn't it great how he's made this decision for all of his readers? Has it occurred to Mr. Riccardi that as a journalist, his own self-fulfilling presumption helps make that true?

Sorry to be so blunt, but it's ridiculous. And illustrative of a much larger problem.

Kudos to CJR for following up–and for the well-deserved shaming of local reporters who apparently couldn't be bothered to do their jobs. There is a story here that the public deserves to know, to include Republicans getting ready to choose their next party chairman.


14 thoughts on “Columbia Journalism Review Slams Local Media For Ignoring SuperPAC Coordination Guilty Plea Story

    1. At least in Colorado, the "liberal media" is one of the biggest myths. It doesn't exist here, except maybe for this blog. We have a fake-center to GOP local media at best. 

  1. I think a lot of Republicans would agree that the local media is going out of its way to cover for Ryan Call and suppress Steve House's challenge. I personally think that has as much to do with the non-coverage as anything.

    But there's almost a month still until the election. I don't think they can keep this stuff suppressed forever.

  2. Is there any proof of a crime committed in Colorado?


    Then this is guilt by association and a non-story. Kudos to the Colorado press corps for not being sucked in by another Colorado Pols hit job.

    1. Maybe you should ask Tom Tancredo if they were coordinating nefarious campaign activities?

      No conspirator ever admits that there is a conspiracy because to do so would ruin their illegal plans.

    2. And the Watergate break-in was just a couple of clumsy burglers but years later were revealed to be traitors to our Democracy and peaceful form of governance.

      Just because all the facts aren't know it doesn't mean that no crimes or ethical lapses have been committed.

        1. Like Laura Waters saying she doesn't discriminate so her discriminatory bill is A-OK.

          One would think that people who constantly thump their chests about how patriotic they are concerned by voter fraud would also show at least a modicum of interest in making sure our elections are untainted by trickery and election fraud.  One would be wrong.  Colored people voting.  Yikes!!! Voter Fraud.  Rich people colluding to rig an election.  "Nothing going on her.  Move along".  What assholes.

    3. Hey dip shit was this another 'one and done' post by you?  A little flyby bullshit to show how much you hate liberals but don't have to guts to actually stick around and discuss the issue and learn from each other.  Afraid all you carefully constructed facades are really totally phony positions at odds with reality?  What a political coward.

  3. Yes, this should have been reported but the fact is, there isn't and never has been any such thing as a clean separation between PACs, candidates and parties. It's always been a farce and not just for Rs. It's not even a matter of this guy getting "caught". It's more like he forgot the rules of this particular aspect of poltical Kabuki theater. He forgot how to pretend that all of these people who know each other and talk to each other aren't talking about anything to do with how to use the money to get their candidates elected. 

    There is, in reality, no hard side money, no soft side money, just money. And as long as the Citizens United decision is left standing, big money, with or without dotting every "i" and crossing every "t" to maintain a flimsy fiction, will be the speech that drowns out all other speech.

    1. There is, in reality, no hard side money, no soft side money, just money.

      I totally agree, and that's why this whole thing is stupid. Let the money flow from the right and left. That's freedom.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments

Posts about

Donald Trump

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo

Posts about

Colorado House

Posts about

Colorado Senate

40 readers online now


Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!