UPDATE: SurveyUSA released its final poll of 2014 today for the Denver Post, showing the gubernatorial race tied and the Senate race within two points:
A poll conducted this week shows Gardner at 46 percent and Udall at 44 percent — a narrow edge within the four-percentage-point margin-of-error. The poll surveyed those who are likely to vote and those who returned ballots in Colorado's first all-mail election…
This SurveyUSA poll appears to have the same problem their director candidly admitted to, crosstabs for Latino voters and women that don't make much sense:
The poll shows Udall's advantage among Latino voters is only three points and only six points among women. Based on past elections, Democrats expect both margins to grow significantly.
In 2010 and 2012, for instance, more than 80 percent of Latino voters supported the Democratic candidates…
Either way, here are two polls that strongly counter the prevalent spin about Garner's "momentum." This race is right where it's been for months–and we're bracing for a photo finish that no one has any real ability to predict today.
—–
The latest survey from Public Policy Polling for the League of Conservation Voters finds both the Colorado U.S. Senate race and gubernatorial races at a perfect deadlock: 48% each for Sen. Mark Udall and Republican Cory Gardner, and a 47% tie between Gov. John Hickenlooper and his Republican opponent Bob Beauprez. From PPP's memo this morning:
-Mark Udall and Cory Gardner are both getting 48% of the vote, with just 4% of voters remaining undecided. Gardner had led by small margins on each of PPP’s previous two polls of the race.
* Udall has notably improved his standing with independents and now leads 59/38 with them. He is also tied based on his strength with the core Democratic constituencies that have helped the party be so successful in Colorado in recent years- he’s up 53/42 with women, 63/27 with Hispanics, and 53/40 with voters under 45.
-John Hickenlooper and Bob Beauprez are each getting 47% in the race for Governor. Hickenlooper has a 55/38 advantage with independents, and similarly to Udall is doing very well with women (51/42), Hispanics (55/27), and younger voters (50/39).
Here's the full memo and crosstabs.
The trajectory between polls from PPP in the Senate race is good news for Udall–their last survey in mid-October showed Gardner leading by three points, and another poll by PPP for Americans for Tax Fairness had Gardner up by two. In the mid-October poll, Hickenlooper led Beauprez by one statistically insignificant point, and the lack of movement there makes a hell of a lot more sense than Quinnipiac's wild swings over the course of too few days.
These numbers say what you already know: this election is going down to the wire.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Coloradans Getting Impatient with Trump Destruction of Public Lands
BY: harrydoby
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Friday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Achole and moderanus praised the last PPP poll – what will they say now? con man cory losing ground. Of course achole may be to involved with his rash to comment.
This one is different. It doesn’t fit with their narrative.
Silence is golden
If the Dems turnout is as the Dem poll suggests it may well be a tie. PPP weighed the polling at R+1. That will be off by 5 or 6 %, currently off by 9+%. If you weigh the poll based on the correct turnout Gardner is up by 5.
What makes you sure you know correct turnout, GOP thought they knew that in 2012 and Romney would win big….oops
GOP predicted not many democrats would turn out in 2012 and boy, were they wrong. The GOP should just STFU with their predictions.
One clue, what was the turnout model of the dem poll released yesterday?
R+7, not R+1.
That is also assuming that every single Republican vote cast was cast in favor of Beauprez and Gardner (and vise versa for the Democratic votes). Commons sense tells us that's not the case, as do the cross tabs which show a picture of a straight party vote not existing.
Do you even math, bro? You can't call that the correct turnout until the turnout is actually known.
Losing indies and hispanic voters by double digits doesn't spell good news for Cory Gardner. Now does it? 😉
AC must be supplying Quinnipiac it's "likely" voter model – they had had Beauprez up 10, then Hick up 10 and now back to Beauprez up 5 … it's tough being a right wing hack in Colorado these days.
Gardner and Beauprez are losing BAD among hispanic and independent voters. 😉
I think PPP had it tied or Buck up by 1 in its final 2010 pole.
Anticipating from the Republicans the equivalent of 2008's "great news for John McCain!" in reference to these poll results.
From the crosstabs, it looked to me like it was 63% Udall–27% Gardner among Hispanic voters, rather than 55-27.
Here there are, Polsters — the three things the GOTP and its minions desperately cannot afford to let you have at this critical moment:
Hope. Optimism. Faith.
Keep up the great work, and please join me if you can in getting out the vote!
We Boulder County Dems will be putting Vote Notes on targeted voter's doors all weekend. My feet are sore just thinking about it. 🙂
Jen, do you know if the kids are turning out?
I don't know. I can pull up statistics for my own precincts (I'm an area coordinator) but not for anywhere else. Someone knows these sorts of details, but not me.
Thanks.
AC, where are you spending election night?
I want to watch the returns come in with you.
TakeBack, I have no idea. The parties tend to have segregated parties, which means it may just be me and Mod. I think the R party is at the Hyatt in the DTC. I have not decided whether to go. I expect with the mail in voting there will be much less suspense this go around.
New numbers from Colorado Secretary of State: Dem ballots received: 337,897. GOP: 443,240. Unaffiliated: 259,947.
This is not good news for us Colorado democrats. I am hoping that the democrat's ground game prevails and I am hoping that many democrats will turn in their ballots in the next few days. We should be winning these races much more easily. The republicans in Colorado are wackos.
are these yesterday's numbers? I thought they only come out on certain days, and yesterday was one of those.
Today. Those numbers you see above will be the numbers released tomorrow. Dems need to turn their ballots in ASAP!
It's tracking about the same as two days or so ago – Reps moved up to 42.4% from 41.9% and Dems edged down to 32.3 from 32.5 … a .6 differential in rate of returned ballots between the previous report. In other words in the past two days or so the GOP has turned in ballots a faster rate than Dems. But, the previous 3-4 day period Dems had made up about a 1% increase in rate of returned ballots over the GOP.
The other thing that may be affecting the "turn in" rate, is the reporting rate – some counties count and report quicker than others. And Reps typically turn them in earlier and Dems later.
Big Time,
The fact that Republicans have increased their percentages in the last couple days tells me it is over. 104 K lead at the 50-60% mark and growing. If 3/4 of the votes are in before Tuesday at this rate you can call it.
…getting desperate, aren't you, shithead?
Ugh! That is awful. Where are you getting the numbers? Are there crosstabs?
From a WSJ article from today
In reality, it is too early to read too much into the Colorado numbers, but that will be less true at the end of this week or the beginning of the next as the votes trickle in. In fact, we may have a very good idea of who has won some of the big races in the state next Monday evening or Tuesday morning by looking at the turnout in some key counties and precincts.
For the moment, however, don’t read too much into the early vote tallies in Colorado.
Watching the tallies from day-to-day might give an indication of whether the Democrats or Republicans are reaching their people, but next weekend may be the big one for votes to come in. (There were more than 1.7 million ballots cast in the state’s 2010 race.) Beyond the mail-ins, there is still the opportunity for individuals to drop votes off at locations around the state on Election Day.
And remember this is the first time the state has used the mail-in system for a major election year, with all its House seats, as well as the Senate seat and the governor’s mansion in the balance. Some bumps in the road – when were ballots received, are they all valid – may be likely, even expected.
There are, for example, no rules about the date by which ballots must be marked. They simply have to be to the county clerk’s office by 7 p.m. on Election Day. There is the question of what happens if a voter loses his or her ballot. (The voter can get a new ballot from the county clerk or vote in person at a polling center — but will voters know where to go?)
That meansthat even with all these early votes, if the races are very close, they may not be over early.
Link to an interesting article regarding voter turnout in several states (including Colorado). Good news and bad news in the article but hope is not lost.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/31/upshot/early-voting-election-results-hold-good-news-for-democrats.html?abt=0002&abg=1&_r=0
My favorite part :The remaining voters who participated in 2010 but haven’t yet cast their ballots are far less Republican.Mark Udall, the Democratic incumbent trailing in the polls, needs more than just the remaining voters from 2010. He is hoping that the state’s new universal mail-voting system will result in more ballots from irregular, Democratic-leaning voters who voted in 2012 but not 2010. The good news for Mr. Udall is that 23 percent of those who have voted so far this time did not participate in 2010, and, so far, they are less Republican than those who voted in 2010.