(The wrath of Tom – Promoted by Colorado Pols)
NextGen Climate today launched its second television ad against Congressman Gardner, highlighting his extreme positions on issues ranging from climate to women’s health.
The 30-second ad, titled “Choices,” delves into decisions Coloradans face, and the choices Congressman Gardner wants to make for them.
“From the doctor’s office to Colorado’s environment, Congressman Gardner consistently puts his extreme views ahead of those of Coloradans,” said Abby Leeper, spokesperson for NextGen Climate Colorado. “No matter how hard he tries, he can’t outrun his voting record, which has been far outside the mainstream. We’re confident that Coloradans will reject Congressman Gardner and his far right record.”
The ad highlights Gardner’s ongoing support for a federal personhood measure and his polluter-friendly voting history including; his vote to repeal EPA findings on the harmful effects of carbon pollution; and his vote to allow unlimited pollution from power plants while taxpayers and our kids pay the price.
For more information, visit www.KeepCoryOut.com
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Coloradans Getting Impatient with Trump Destruction of Public Lands
BY: harrydoby
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Friday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Hooray for out of state billionaires meddling in Colorado politics!
Don't bite hand that feeds you, Zippy.
Once again. No one has ever paid me to post here. I'm involved politically, but I am not a "paid shill" as you define them
Actually, I sort of believe you. I think you may genuinely be one of those (sad) "true believers."
Your cartoon-loving partner, on the other hand, reeks of corporate sponsorship.
OK, fair enough. I'll stop referring to you as a Koch troll.
I definitely believe modster. Strictly amateur, I'm sure. Probably not shaving yet.
Brutally effective. I love seeing Dems no longer just laying down and taking it on the chin from the lying GOTP con artists and frauds, deep in the pockets of the polluters and the oil barons.
Maybe Con Man, The Franking King and BothWays will start a law firm in 2015, once they've all been defeated. Or a used-car lot.
Don't you find it unseemly that this group that says it's about climate keeps talking about women's issues? Couldn't that be divisive within the left?
I think the climate billionaire (who got rich off coal) should stick to global warming.
I find anything that is honest and ethical (as this ad is), which also manages to defeat your party's dark and evil agenda to be most seemly. Thanks for asking.
In an election cycle when the crazy dial has been turned up to 10 and ripped off a la the repulsive musings of Ready and Chaps, Moderatus wants to talk about what is " unseemly ". Fucking A these people have just lost it.
Don't you mean 11?
What the hell, turn it up to 12 !
You think that discussion of "women's issues" would be divisive for the left? Jesus, it's one of the few things we agree on. No wonder you people are losing in Colorado
I would not be so sure about that. There are many good pro life Christians I know who value the environment. They are essentially being asked to split the baby.
Please define the word "value" in this context. I'd be very interested in hearing more.
You know a number of pro-life Christians who favor personhood and who value the environment who identify as being on the left??!? Um…OK. The description you offer excludes at least half the women on the right, let alone the left.
Stop using the stupid word Personhood. We are pro life.
And who said anything about identifying on the left? That's my point. There are those who are pro life and pro environment, and this ad assumes those people do not exist.
Oh, Moddy. You did, Just a few comments up.
You are anti-abortion, anti-family planning, and anti-child poverty programs. You may also support the death penalty, which is not a pro-life position by definition.
Why do we use the word "personhood?" Because you're trying to define the nature of what constitutes a person (i.e. definitionally, personhood). Sites for the movement use the damned word themselves. And the bill itself defines the "human person." You picked the Albatross, now live with how the necklace fits.
Short answer, modster. No. How would that be devisive on the left?
I think when Moddy wrote "left" he meant "the environmentally minded." When your worldview is that everyone concerned with the welfare of the Earth or the people that live on it is a communist, however, that's an easy mistake to make.
You mean like Dudley Brown and RMGOpers making issues out of abortion and gay rights??? . . .
. . . go AC yourself you hypocritical assclown.
Well, aren't you special, you have such interesting opinions about…things.