U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Michael Bennet
(D) Phil Weiser
60%↑
50%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) David Seligman
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez
(D) J. Danielson
(R) Sheri Davis
50%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(D) Jeff Bridges
(R) Kevin Grantham
40%
40%
30%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Trisha Calvarese
(D) Eileen Laubacher
90%
20%
20%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Manny Rutinel
(D) Shannon Bird
45%↓
40%
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
January 09, 2008 11:43 PM UTC
12 Comments
If they are going to drive people to a website like this, they should put up the citations there they use in the ad. Not everyone is going to just take their word for it.
Oh wait, the Repubs never have citations because they make most everything up. Why the double standard?
– dave
ps – I do agree citations would be good, but why is the right never held to that standard?
What’s your problem? How does building the most solid case possible against Bob Schaffer have anything to do with your complaint? Sell your soap elsewhere.
Nor are the won or lost on issue papers, detailed lists of the candidates stand, or anything else like that.
And every time we Dems try to win a campaign that way – we lose. I prefer to run a campaign to win rather than based on the way we wish people made their decisions.
But apparently they are won or lost on how amazing (or not) campaign websites are, which you constantly bitch about before mentioning how great your mom’s was. Go condescend to your cat or something – although it won’t be much more impressed than I.
No I don’t think much of Schaffer’s website – but I think what hurts the most is the perception of no depth it gives. I don’t think anyone has read all of Udall’s site – but it comes across as that of a candidate who has put in a lot of thought on all the issues, and is reaching out to everyone. And that is worth a lot.
– dave
I don’t have a cat but I talked to my dog. Since he’s a Golden he was very responsive – of course, they’re responsive and thrilled about anything. (ps – I don’t think my mom’s website was great – my point with it is that 1 person, 2 days, you can have a decent website. So why would a candidate not do that…)
I just think you were being a gas bag about a red herring issue.
I was being sarcastic – unsuccessfully apparently. Oh well, they’re (my comments) not all winners.
I am not sure who your target audience is here.
This ad will not work well with moderate Republicans.
Maybe Independents.
It seams to target only the anti-Bush administration Crowd which means speaking to your own base.
The Republicans who are unhappy with the current administration have already got the memo that Bush is not on the ballot, AND they know Shaffer was not part of the Bush Administration.
So what else ya got?
And they will keep doing that, fairly in some cases, unfairly in others, all through the election. Standard Operating Procedure when the president is very unpopular.
ad.
ProgressNow better watch it, or they’ll be committing a “General Betray Us” screwup.
I think Schaffer is a train wreck – and so’s his campaign – but at least he was honest and principled when it came to honoring his term limits pledge. I will give him that.