CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese



President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump



CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*


CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*


CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks




CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg




CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Dave Williams



CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*


CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen



CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi




State Senate Majority See Full Big Line





State House Majority See Full Big Line





Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
June 08, 2013 06:05 AM UTC

Weekend Open Thread

  • by: Colorado Pols

"I bet after seeing us, George Washington would sue us for calling him 'father.'"

–Will Rogers


18 thoughts on “Weekend Open Thread

  1. Secession is the wrong word.    The fact The Denver Post and Colorado Pols are beating this drum only confirms my suspicions that CPols is Curtis Hubbard’s and Lynn Barfels side project.

    There are so many Federal ties, a 51rst State would still be joined at the hip with Colorado.

    Ironically, Colorado and its amendment #64 is more of a step towards succession than any other State action in the past 100 years!

    IT is a sad time in humanity when a cheap smear is more important than objectivity.



  2. A 1 percenter tells the truth about "job creators"

    Nick Hanauer, successful entrepreneur and one percenter, gave testimony on income inequality a few days ago before the U.S. Senate. His testimony in full should be posted in every break room in America:


    For 30 years, Americans on the right and left have accepted a particular explanation for the origins of
    Prosperity in capitalist economies. It is that rich business people like me are “Job Creators. ” That if taxes go up on us or our companies, we will create fewer jobs. And that the lower our taxes are, the more jobs we will create and the more general prosperity we’ ll have.

    Many of you in this room are certain that these claims are true. But sometimes the ideas that we know to be true are dead wrong. For thousands of years people were certain, positive, that earth was at the center of the universe. It’s not, and anyone who doesn’t know that would have a very hard time doing astronomy.

    My argument today is this: In the same way that it’s a fact that the sun, not earth is the center of the solar system, it’s also a fact that the middle class, not rich business people like me are the center of America’s economy.

    I’ll argue here that prosperity in capitalist economies never trickles down from the top. Prosperity is built from the middle out.As an entrepreneur and investor, I have started or helped start, dozens of businesses and initially hired lots of people. But if no one could have afforded to buy what we had to sell, my businesses would all would have failed and all those jobs would have evaporated.

    That’s why I am so sure that rich business people don’t create jobs, nor do businesses, large or small. What does lead to more employment is a “circle of life” like feedback loop between customers and businesses. And only consumers can set in motion this virtuous cycle of increasing demand and
    hiring.That's why the real job creators in America are middle-class consumers. The more money they have, and the more they can buy, the more people like me have to hire to meet demand.

    So when businesspeople like me take credit for creating jobs, it’s a little like squirrels taking credit for creating evolution. In fact, it’s the other way around. Anyone who's ever run a business knows that hiring
    more people is a capitalist’s course of last resort, something we do if and only if increasing customer demand requires it.

    Further, that the goal of every business—profit– is largely a measure of our relative ability to not create jobs compared to our competitors. In this sense, calling ourselves job creators isn't just inaccurate, it's disingenuous.

    That’s why our current policies are so upside down. When you have a tax system in which most of the exemptions and the lowest rates benefit the richest, all in the name of job creation, all that happens is that the rich get richer. Since 1980 the share of income for the richest 1% of Americans has tripled while our effective tax rates have by approximately 50%. If it were true that lower tax rates and more wealth for the wealthy would lead to more job creation, then today we would be drowning in jobs. If it was true that more profit for corporations or lower tax rates for corporations lead to more job creation, then it could not also be true that both corporate profits and unemployment are at 50 year highs.

    There can never be enough super rich Americans like me to power a great economy. I earn 1000 times the median wage, but I do not buy 1000 times as much stuff. My family owns three cars, not 3,000. I buy a few pairs of pants and a few shirts a year, just like most American men. Like everyone else, we
    go out to eat with friends and family only occasionally. I can’t buy enough of anything to make up for the fact that millions of unemployed and underemployed Americans can’t buy any new clothes or cars or enjoy any meals out. Or to make up for the decreasing consumption of the vast majority of American families that are barely squeaking by, buried by spiraling costs and trapped by stagnant or declining wages.This is why the fast increasing inequality in our society is killing our economy. When
    most of the money in the economy ends up in just a few hands, it strangles consumption and creates a death spiral of falling demand.

    Significant privileges have come to capitalists like me for being perceived as “job creators”at the center of the economic universe, and the language and metaphors we use to defend the fairness of the current social and economic arrangements is telling. For instance, it is a small step from “job creator” to “The Creator.”

    When someone like me calls himself a job creator, it sounds like we are describing how the economy works. What we are actually doing is making a claim on status, power and privileges.The extraordinary differential between the 15-20% tax rate on capital gains, dividends, and carried interest for capitalists, and the 39% top marginal rate on work for ordinary Americans is just one of those privileges.
    We’ve had it backward for the last 30 years. Rich businesspeople like me don’t create jobs. Rather, jobs are a consequence of an ecosystemic feedback loop animated by middle- class consumers, and when they thrive, businesses grow and hire, and owners profit in a virtuous cycle of increasing returns that benefits everyone.

    I’d like to finish with a quick story.About 500 years ago, Copernicus and his pal Galileo came along and proved that the earth wasn’t the center of the solar system. A great achievement, but it didn’t go to well for them with the political leaders of the time. Remember that Galileo invented the telescope, so one could see, with one’s own eyes, the fact that he was right. You may recall, however, that the leaders of the time didn’t much care, because if earth wasn’t the center of the universe, then earth was diminished—and if earth was diminished, so were they. And that fact–their status and power–was the only fact they really cared about. So they told Galileo to stick his telescope where the sun didn’t shine and put him in jail for the rest of his life.

    And by so doing, put themselves on the wrong side of history forever. 500 years later, we are arguing about what or whom is at the center of the economic universe. A few rich guys like me, or the American Middle class. But as sure as the sun is the center of our solar system, the middle class is the center of our economy. If we care about building a fast growing economy that provides opportunity for every American, then we must enact policies that build it from the middle out, not the top down.

    Tax the wealthy and corporations–as we once did in this country—and invest that money in the middle class as we once did in this country. Those polices won’ t just be great for the middle class, they’ll be great for the poor, for businesses large and small, and the rich.


    h/t digby

    1. I would add one thing to that. Those of us focused on growing our business (as opposed to extracting maximum profits), even though we benefit from the present system, would benefit more form a middle-class centric system. Because a growing economy is the most powerful tool for growing a business.

    2. All of this sounds very familiar. Like what many of us here have been saying all along.  I'd like to add that, while  opportunity to make it as an entrepreneur is a wonderful thing, the GOP selling that opportunity as the only thing, the only tool in their economic kit, is a joke for simple reasons. 

      We are never going to be an economy composed of  90% entrepreneurs.  But let's say we can expand the number of entrepreneurs. What will this expanded  entrepreneurial army need? An army of reasonably prosperous paying customers and clients

      That means we need an economy in which, while there is plenty of opportunity to make it to the top  with a successful business, there are also plentiful well paying jobs for the majority who aren't going to ever win or even enter that race (we'll still need teachers, nurses, police, firefighters, EMTs, construction sector, service sector and all manner of workers besides entrepreneurs) to provide a broad base of consumers for all the goods and services provided by that minority of  successful entrepreneurs.

      Dems don't want to take away the opportunity to make a killing with a successful business but R economic policies, with their sole focus on the opportunity to join an elite minority, have the consequence, often intended, of taking jobs that provide a decent middle class income for the majority out of the economy. 

      The R model creates a tiny class of winners (nothing kills new busineses like lack of customers) and a huge class of losers. History shows us where that takes a society and it isn't a place Americans should want to go.

      1. This sorta stands Ayn Rand's concept of "Takers and Makers" on it's head.  MIddleclass consumers with money to spend are the Makers, while the 1% are the real Takers.

  3. Encouraging news that the Kids are Alright (apologies if this was posted earlier — work has kept me away from this site far too much):

    • In January, the CNRC asked identified "winnable" young people who had voted for Obama, the words that came to mind when hearing the words "Republican Party." Four of the most common responses: "closed-minded, racist, rigid, old-fashioned." Democrats, by contrast, were "tolerant," "diverse," and "open-minded."
    • Young voters don't consider elected officials to be the Republican Party's leaders. A focus group in Ohio selected Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and Bill O'Reilly as the most iconic figures they identify with the GOP. By contrast, they identified Barack Obama, the Clintons, and Nancy Pelosi, along with other prominent current and former elected officials.
    • The report accused Republicans of not having any "substance behind" a vague message of economic growth. "Economic growth and opportunity policies cannot just be about tax cuts and spending cuts," the report says. It needs to be backed up with specific policy prescriptions on health care, immigration, and education.
    • On immigration, the report concludes that young Latino voters think the GOP "couldn't care less" about them.
    • Republicans need to drop their "big government" argument against policies, according to the report. "When Republicans proudly say they are going to take on President Obama’s 'big-government policies,' many young people shrug their shoulders, unsure what we mean by 'big government' and exactly how that crusade will make their lives better," the report says.
    • Read more:

    And since we have so many GOP apologists insisting that all's right with the Party, I think the axiom that progress only happens one funeral at a time will hold true once again.​

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments

Posts about

Donald Trump

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo

Posts about

Colorado House

Posts about

Colorado Senate

88 readers online now


Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!