U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Michael Bennet
50%
50%
50%
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) Brian Mason
60%↑
30%↑
20%↓
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez
(D) George Stern
(R) Sheri Davis
50%↑
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%↑
30%
20%↓
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Manny Rutinel
(D) Yadira Caraveo
45%↓
40%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
March 27, 2023 12:23 AM UTC
20 Comments
Question for the day. If we Democrats are by and large campaigning competently, have great policies, are passing exceptional legislation, and governing well – why are the voters split 50/50? If we're so much better, why isn't it 60/40? Or at least 55/45?
So I ask those of you here that say we Democrats are terrific, that get upset when I or others list out things we think need to be done differently, why if we we offer to the voters is so superior, why is the national vote 50/50?
So tell me – why?
Also, hate to post & run but I've got to focus on work for the next couple of months so you'll all have to get by without my brilliant insight.
Keith Olberman can tell you why.
I'm not going to presume to speak for anyone else here. But in my case, I don't get upset when someone makes a specific and honest criticism of something a Dem does, and especially appreciate if they lay out a compelling case. Still might or might not agree, but it's good to look at complex issues in detail with open minds and through multiple perspectives. And disagreeing with someone who points out specific stuff isn't just "getting upset" if the person disagreeing can lay out a compelling case as to why they think the assertion is wrong.
The reason I snarked yesterday is because you went nuclear and said "failing at the basic job of governing," plus you did it while speaking for "we Democrats." It's your right to say that, but it's my right to call you on it, especially if I think it's off-the-charts inaccurate.
In a nutshell: On the federal level the Dems really are not doing that well. Or at least, that is the perception. They allow the GOP to continually dominate the discussion so all people see is chaos (because that is what the GOP is these days).
I really think your assertion that the divide is 50/50 ignores the many anti-democratic forces at play – electoral college, the senate, limiting the number in the House of Representatives, gerrymandering, several SCOTUS rulings. Based on the straight numbers the Democrats won the Presidency by 7 million votes. That's hardly 50/50.
The left and center-left do have some institutional roadblocks which benefit the other side.
Biden…..51.3%
Trump…46.8%
Sorry you won't be here for the many answers to your questions. How about this one: Republicans are truly brainwashed by rightwing media – TV, radio, social media. Absolutely brainwashed. Where is the Democratic counterpart? There is not one. Those who listen to and follow rightwing media hear the same lies repeated hour after hour, day after day, year after year – and they believe the lies. You need to do a little door-to-door campaigning or phone banking to understand how effective this is – you'll get the lies spouted back to you from people who have zero interest in learning the truth about anything. The fear mongering and hate that is spread by the rightwingers is exceedingly effective.
Of course, Dave's not going anywhere that he can't get online. But to tag on to your post, he said yesterday he was from Boulder where everybody's liberal. If anyone is seriously wondering why national voter stats might be close to 50-50, Biden's win by 7 million votes aside, very much of it has to be because a big chunk of the population lives in areas where most everybody is conservative. That means conservative positions and voting recommendations get passed along through families, neighborhoods, churches, media, word of mouth, and whatnot ("whatnot" covers all kinds of stuff).
“You can’t say it’s because the voters are stupid”
But many of them are. And your conclusion – in a democracy, everyone gets to vote – is a non sequitur.
Everyone does have the opportunity to vote. But most voters are still stupid.
Okay LB, you said it first, so I can toss in my 2 cents, now. Why is it 50/50? It’s what I call the Tigger Principle (it’s my nickname). “People are stupid, ignorant, and lazy”. They’re not that bright. They don’t know what they don’t know, and can’t be bothered to learn. So they just swallow whatever the dominant media tells them, and in the broad middle of the country, media is dominated by the Right. It’s also what Lydon Johnson said:
“If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”
“If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”
Johnson may have been a coarse and vulgar crook who routinely used some pretty offensive language, but he was one smart SOB when it came to reading people.
I referred today’s QOTDave to the latest upgrade to an already recognized authority in all fields, with impeccable credentials and unmatched accolades — ChatGPT 9000 (BetaMax v. 2023.01).
They replied:
(The web-page display then reverted to what appeared to be a looping screen from the early 1970s of that Pong game playing itself to the accompaniment of an electronica version of portions of movements from Also sprach Zarathustra.)
So, I waited about 3 minutes for an answer, which seemed overly long given the high importance and urgency of the matter. And, I asked again, saying that I have been a long-time and frequent customer there, that I had been waiting patiently for a response, that I didn’t expect perfection but that I expected better, and re-entered my question this time adding one of those red-flag “high importance” indicators, two red subject line apostrophes, and a red-faced frowny emoji.
They answered:
The news from Israel is “a BFD”, to quote our president. Democracy is under attack around the world.
Netanyahu is simply following the lead of the American GOP. When the Uber-right, Christian -flavored JBT (Justices by Trump) joined the Haters in Black (Alito and Thomas), and took over the Supreme Court, Congress became irrelevant, and lawmaking is now being done in the high court.
In other words, when you consistently lose elections, fucking with the courts is your next move.
The only difference is that Bibi's coalition started to fall apart as some turned on him. So he backed down. At least temporarily.
With the exceptions of John McCain, Mitt Romney, Liz Cheney and a handful of Republican governors, Trump never faced that kind of pushback.
Ain't it funny how the people who, for years, squalled like mashed cats about "legislating from the bench" aren't making a peep about it now?
Almost as if their words don't actually mean anything…
The “n” word is now being used on this site casually. I think I’m done here.
Sorry to hear that, jimmay. I hope you will reconsider. One of the reasons this site persists is its reluctance to censor. The offender will answer to the readership.
Being a schmuck comes with a price tag.