CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese



President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump



CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*


CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*


CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks




CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg




CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank



CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*


CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen



CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi




State Senate Majority See Full Big Line





State House Majority See Full Big Line





Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
November 16, 2022 09:47 AM UTC

CD-3 Voters With Faulty Ballots Suddenly Extremely Popular

  • by: Colorado Pols

Lauren Boebert checking to see if this tarantula cured its ballot.

As Denver7’s Colette Bordelon reports, in the rush to “cure” ballots by close of business today in Colorado’s unexpectedly close CD-3 race between Democrat Adam Frisch and Republican incumbent freshman locus of outrage Lauren Boebert, voters who had a temporarily disqualifying error on their ballot, usually unsigned or an issue with their signature not matching official records, have become the subject of a nationwide campaign to “encourage” them fix the problem and have their vote counted. And like anyone who finds themselves suddenly on the receiving end of large numbers of text messages, phone calls, and door knocks from salesman, missionaries, and/or political campaigns, it’s certainly a jarring experience:

In Pueblo County, some campaigns are annoying their constituents by aggressively pursuing voters who need to cure their ballot. Tactics include calling, texting, reaching out to relatives, and in a few instances, showing up at voter’s homes…

Ortiz said there were 725 Pueblo voters who needed to fix signature discrepancies. At last check, he said around 300 ballots still needed to be cured.

“People’s interest in the curable ballots, they’re only interested in that when there’s a close race like this one. A lot of times, there’s nobody calling these people, and so they’re not used to it. They’re not used to the attention that they’re getting, just like my elections department is not used to the attention they’re getting,” said Ortiz. “My post was a warning out there to campaigns, letting them know that we’re getting a lot of complaints.”

So first of all, it needs to be restated that only a tiny fraction of voters are being contacted by the campaigns about problems that prevented their ballot from being counted. “A lot of complaints” can’t add up to more than the number of problematic ballots, and voters who are upset about being contacted can rest easy in the knowledge that races are rarely close enough to provoke this kind of attention–and correcting signature issues on a ballot helps prevent the problem from happening the next election.

Having gone through all the trouble of completing and returning a mail ballot, it’s hard for us to imagine anyone not wanting to ensure their ballot counts–especially in this extremely close congressional race that could decide the majority in Congress. Just like with voting by mail, the best way to make the phone calls and text messages chasing your ballot stop is to deal with the issue as quickly as possible.

With all of that said, it’s possible that campaigns employing “crowdsourcing” techniques to direct volunteers en masse at this small pool of voters is an excessively brute-force strategy, and that could be a useful subject of study in the aftermath. All we can say today is, neither campaign wants to lose this race due to any action they could have in retrospect taken.

There’s a hard limit to all of this, just a few hours away.


12 thoughts on “CD-3 Voters With Faulty Ballots Suddenly Extremely Popular

    1. Signature matching isn't by legibility or "is the full name signed."  It is by characteristics of writing … slant, motions, rhythm, relative sizes and possibly common letters.  As long as your signature looks like previous signatures on ballots, driver's license, or other interactions with the government, you should be fine.

  1. Ballots needing cured because the signature doesn't match what is on file is actually pretty rare. If Pueblo has a large number of these, this suggests to me less than adequate signature verification training by the Clerk's office.

    The far more common reason for needed cures is the voter forgot to sign the envelope at all. So if people don't want to be contacted after they vote, they need to follow directions.

    The same is true for those who were instructed to provide ID and failed to do so (the #2 reason why cures are needed).

    1. Pueblo county had (as of last week) 67,263 ballots returned. 

      Ortiz said there were 725 Pueblo voters who needed to fix signature discrepancies.

      I'm not real good at math, but that looks like slightly over 1% …

    1. Same. I think I had started signing things with just a J instead of my entire first name, but my ballot signature was still looking the full name spelled out.

  2. Young voter needing ballot curing sez "I'm never gonna vote again! So THERE!"

    That is so in line with the prevailing perception that voting isn't so much a civic duty, but now just a form of "lifestyle expression." Pathetic.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments

Posts about

Donald Trump

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo

Posts about

Colorado House

Posts about

Colorado Senate

37 readers online now


Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!