CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese



President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump



CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*


CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*


CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks




CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg




CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Dave Williams



CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*


CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen



CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi




State Senate Majority See Full Big Line





State House Majority See Full Big Line





Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
March 06, 2022 12:29 PM UTC

Why Colorado drillers are unlikely to pump more oil amid Russia-Ukraine crisis

  • by: Colorado Pols

(For your next debate over gas prices — Republished by Colorado Pols)

As the global oil market continued to be rocked by the fallout from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Denver-based drilling giant PDC Energy on Monday held a conference call with investors to tout its latest acquisition and lay out its financial and operational plans for 2022.

The message delivered to shareholders by chief financial officer Scott Meyers was clear: Soaring prices are unlikely to impact PDC’s drilling activity in the near future — but they’re sure to mean more money in investors’ pockets.

“We’ve tried to articulate the manner in which we will execute our return of capital initiatives in various commodity-price worlds,” said Meyers, pointing shareholders to a slide that outlined three different possible financial strategies. “As you can see, in all of the prices, our first commandment is to honor the base dividend.”

“Sitting here today, we’re obviously in a bullish price environment,” he added, referring to the surge in U.S. oil prices to nearly $110 a barrel, an eight-year high. “Meaning we’ll aim to meet our 60% post-dividend commitment, predominantly through share buybacks.”

The global energy shock caused by the invasion of Ukraine by Russia, from which the U.S. imports more than 500,000 barrels of crude oil daily, has prompted new calls from across the political spectrum for more domestic drilling to bring down gasoline prices, or even to achieve “energy independence.” Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert, who represents Colorado’s 3rd District, spoke for many in her party by wearing a shawl emblazoned with the words “Drill Baby Drill” at Tuesday’s State of the Union address.

But in Colorado and beyond, large oil companies currently reporting their 2021 financial results and 2022 outlooks to shareholders are pledging to continue holding back on new production as they prioritize positive cash flows and capital returns for investors.

The increased dividends and stock buybacks are part of what executives at PDC, Colorado’s third-largest oil producer, called its “new return of capital framework,” and the company is far from alone. Occidental Petroleum, the state’s top producer, also detailed its “new shareholder return framework” in a January earnings call, while the newly-formed Civitas Resources has touted an “updated stockholder distribution strategy.”

After plummeting amid a demand shock in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. oil production is rising again — but slowly. A forecast last month from the federal Energy Information Administration projected that daily domestic production wouldn’t return to pre-pandemic levels until late 2023.

In its 2022 financial guidance this week, PDC projected that its oil production in Colorado would dip by 7% in the first quarter and grow at an overall rate of zero to 5% for the next two years. PDC assured investors, however, that “under the company’s enhanced return of capital framework … cumulative shareholder returns in 2022 and 2023 are expected to exceed $1.7 billion.”

‘We’re not going to change our growth plans’

Beginning in the late 2000s, the U.S. oil and gas industry underwent what was dubbed the “shale revolution” — a dramatic production boost enabled by new technologies like horizontal drilling and advanced hydraulic fracturing, better known as fracking.

In Colorado, the shale revolution brought a staggering six-fold increase in oil production between 2010 and 2019, nearly all of which came in the Denver-Julesburg Basin in the northeast quarter of the state. The drilling boom in Colorado and elsewhere helped drive down gas prices throughout much of the decade, and in 2018 made the U.S. the world’s top oil producer for the first time since 1973.

But independent financial analysts had long questioned the sustainability of shale drilling, also known as “unconventional” production. The new drilling techniques were expensive, requiring large capital and operating expenditures and tight margins that made producers vulnerable to price volatility. Wall Street investors funneled large amounts of cash into the fracking boom in the early 2010s, but gradually soured on the industry as many operators racked up debt and unconventional wells struggled to produce enough oil and gas to be profitable.

While COVID-19’s impact on the oil and gas sector was what made headlines, a financial reckoning was already well underway in early 2020, reshaping the industry through a wave of bankruptcies, mergers and acquisitions that began before the onset of the pandemic and has continued long after.

In Colorado, the latest upheaval came with PDC’s announcement on Monday that it had acquired Great Western Petroleum, the state’s fifth-largest oil producer in 2021, in a $1.3 billion deal. The acquisition means that over the last two years, seven of the nine largest oil producers in Colorado have combined into just two companies — PDC and Civitas. Meanwhile, Anadarko Petroleum and Noble Energy, the state’s No. 1 and No. 2 producers as of 2019, were each sold to larger multinational corporations — Occidental and Chevron, respectively.

For the most part, these newly consolidated companies are heeding Wall Street’s calls to reinvest less money in expanding production and instead increase returns for shareholders. Civitas, which will release its end-of-year results and 2022 guidance next week, pitched itself to investors in a December presentation as a company “delivering on the new (exploration and production) business model,” touting its cash flows, low leverage and “disciplined capital allocation.”

Even with oil prices surging, oil executives and financial analysts don’t see the industry’s calculus changing any time soon: “Whether it’s $150 oil, $200 oil, or $100 oil, we’re not going to change our growth plans,’’ Scott Sheffield, CEO of Texas-based Pioneer Natural Resources, told an interviewer last month.

New drilling rules not ‘a big problem’

In Colorado, Boebert has responded to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine by attacking what she called President Joe Biden’s “pathetic energy policies,” and has helped lead a Republican effort urging Congress and the administration to “immediately unleash our full energy potential.”

But the oil and gas industry is currently sitting on more than 9,000 approved permits to drill on federally owned lands across the country, including 543 permits to drill on public lands in Colorado, according to data released last month by the Bureau of Land Management.

The situation is much the same in the oil-rich Denver-Julesburg Basin north of Denver, where most drilling takes place on private lands, according to a Newsline review of operator financial statements.

The Ukraine crisis has prompted some Colorado Republicans to call for the rolling back of state-level oil and gas regulations. Jon Caldara, president of the right-wing Independence Institute, advocated repeal of Senate Bill 19-181, the landmark 2019 law that directed state drilling regulators to better protect health, safety and the environment. Some industry advocates said the new rules that resulted from SB-181, which included a 2,000-foot setback of wells from homes and other buildings, were a “essentially a ban” on new drilling.

But in financial statements and earnings calls — venues in which companies are legally barred from misleading investors — executives have been consistently sanguine about the impacts of the state’s new regulatory regime under SB-181.

PDC’s end-of-year report Monday noted its extensive stockpile of hundreds of approved permits and drilled but uncompleted wells, which it said “represents an inventory life of more than ten years at the current development pace” — and plenty of additional drilling permits for approved surface locations are on their way, including for the locations that the company plans to acquire from Great Western.

In response to a question from an investor, David Lillo, PDC’s senior vice president of operations, said during the company’s earnings call that obtaining subsurface permits from the state “hasn’t really been a big problem in the previous years, even under the new rules.”

Colorado Newsline is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Colorado Newsline maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Quentin Young for questions: Follow Colorado Newsline on Facebook and Twitter.


17 thoughts on “Why Colorado drillers are unlikely to pump more oil amid Russia-Ukraine crisis

  1. Once again, far right pundits such as Jon Caldara and Lauren Boebert are wrong (what else is new?).

    With their thousands of acres of undeveloped leases, sitting as enhancements to the corporate bottom lines, the companies control the what, when, how of liquid mineral production in Colorado. 

    But, what the heck, uninformed commentary by the far righties plays well to the uneducated parts of the so-called “base.”

  2. Long story made short . . .

    . . . Our oily boyz be lovin’ themselves a little Pooty-Poot right now even more than Tucker Carlson on a Saint Petersburg Mar a Lago holiday.

    “Invade baby, invade!”

    1. Yup.

      There is no shortage of oil…or gas. With plenty of permits stacked up, there is only one thing causing prices to skyrocket…debt.

      The shale drillers and producers rode the Bush drilling boom until there was such a glut, the market tanked in a big way. The big money OilyBoyz were staring at some pretty scary balance sheets.

      This is their chance to recoup some of their losses. A commitment to a 60% dividend for their shareholders, if I understand it, means production will receive little to no extra funding. 

      Drilling rigs lay down because investors will not pay to stand them up. There are countless wells that aren't being fracked…investors are wary.  Producers don't get funding from "Hip National Bank" … they pay the drillers (actually, just about everybody) with borrowed money.

      The OilyBoyz and their legions of Fossilonians are dancing to the bank while jacking up prices…wait for it…BECAUSE THEY CAN. 

      …and they will do so until America makes them irrelevant. That may take a while, but it is inevitable. They are, once again, shooting themselves in the foot. 

      $5.00/ gal. gasoline sure makes an electric car look much more inviting.


    2. And there is probably great rejoicing in 17th Street offices that OPEC determined it would not increase production quotas in this new price boom. 

      Personally, I think this would be a great time to put on a new flexible tax, insuring the price would remain at $5 or $6 a gallon, with rebates to those with incomes under the national average.  Push hard, and there can be an even bigger boom for alternative energy vehicles, use of public transportation, and perhaps even people getting a little more exercise.

      half the revenue to infrastructure to make it less likely that individuals will need to pay for re-alignments, broken windshields, and auto accidents, and the other half to diminish the national debt — tossing a bone to the Republicans in a tizzy over "bankrupting the next generation."

    1. Once the major car manufacturers jumped on the EV bandwagon, it has resulted in a mindset change among consumers as well.  Unfortunately, production capacity is far behind this hockey stick rise in demand.  Almost every manufacturer is looking at 2023 and 2024 to satisfy current order backlogs.

      Even the market leader Tesla is unable to build them fast enough.  I just checked their order site, and the cheapest Model Y is projected to be available for delivery by December.  Of course, more expensive models are available sooner, which is true of all the EVs from GM, Ford, Rivian, Lucid, etc.  VW just announced plans to build another factory in Wolfsburg, but that is to build their new 2026 models.

      1. I have a friend who has a substantial amount of solar generation at his house. He charges his electric and hybrid vehicles at home and pays next to nothing for the electricity.

        The OilyBoyz want as much as they can get of that 2.5 trillion dollars Americans have saved during the pandemic

        1. Yep, in addition to charging at home for pennies per mile, I just had my major service after almost two years of ownership.  I replaced my windshield wipers 😉

          But unfortunately, our domestic producers are looking to maximize profits at every turn. Their greed and short-sightedness back in 2014 thinking that the price would reach $200 a barrel bankrupted many a small producer. Now they see their chance to once again push the price to new records, damn the world’s suffering.

          My niece’s husband ordered a Ford Lightning EV truck. It won’t be delivered until next year 🙁

          1. We need to up alcohol fuel 10 fold, but from the cornstalks, etc, not the corn.  

            Ag waste corn cobs corn stalks, wheat straw, rice straw, sugar cane bagasse, etc can all be made into alcohol.

      1. Here's a fact you won't hear on Fox News today. Exxon, Chevron, and Conoco made $46 billion in profit in 2021. Now they're using 40% of those profits for stock buybacks.

  3. while the price of crude is highly visible, we lose sight of what the refineries are doing…they are the choke points in fuel production… the price of gasoline at the pumps doesn't reflect the bulk price at the refinery…that happens after delivery…local prices reflect final delivery price plus local profits…that is what happened the last time crude oil prices were going astronomical…How else do you check for price gouging?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments

Posts about

Donald Trump

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo

Posts about

Colorado House

Posts about

Colorado Senate

67 readers online now


Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!