CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

50%↑

15%

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 03, 2011 09:12 PM UTC

"Niggerhead" Scandal: The End For Perry?

  • 42 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

As the Washington Post reported this weekend:

In the early years of his political career, Rick Perry began hosting fellow lawmakers, friends and supporters at his family’s secluded West Texas hunting camp, a place known by the name painted in block letters across a large, flat rock standing upright at its gated entrance.

“Niggerhead,” it read.

Ranchers who once grazed cattle on the 1,070-acre parcel on the Clear Fork of the Brazos River called it by that name well before Perry and his father, Ray, began hunting there in the early 1980s. There is no definitive account of when the rock first appeared on the property. In an earlier time, the name on the rock was often given to mountains and creeks and rock outcroppings across the country. Over the years, civil rights groups and government agencies have had some success changing those and other racially offensive names that dotted the nation’s maps.

But the name of this particular parcel did not change for years after it became associated with Rick Perry, first as a private citizen, then as a state official and finally as Texas governor. Some locals still call it that. As recently as this summer, the slablike rock – lying flat, the name still faintly visible beneath a coat of white paint – remained by the gated entrance to the camp…

In the aftermath of this story, the presidential campaign of Rick Perry has gone into full-scale damage control mode, insisting that the slab painted with the word “Niggerhead” at the entrance to his hunting ranch had been painted over in the 1980s–a claim disputed by the Washington Post based on eyewitness testimony, one former worker at the ranch claiming it was visible “as recently as 2008.” Primary opponent Herman Cain has condemned the name of Perry’s hunting ranch as “insensitive,” and Perry himself (obviously) isn’t trying to defend it so much as he is running from it as fast as he can. There’s no question it’s a distraction the already-flagging Perry campaign doesn’t need, and will further repulse Republican voters in Northern states like New Hampshire–who already aren’t plussed by a perceived intellectual lightweight Texas governor. How about an intellectual lightweight racist redneck Texas governor?

That would make it official: the Republican ticket is ready for a new savior.

The reason that this story is so damaging for Perry is in large part because it is both simple and memorable. Rick Perry’s Family Ranch was Called “Niggerhead”. Was it still called “Niggerhead” two years ago? 10 years ago? We understand the spin that Perry’s camp is trying to do here, but it really doesn’t make that much difference when they may have tried to paint over the name. It’s Perry’s family ranch, it’s been there for awhile, and you can apparently see the name even though it was painted-over. This story is so easy to use to bludgeon Perry in advertisements that it will likely be absolutely crippling to his campaign, no matter what they say about it. There’s no amount of spin that will fix this now; Team Perry needed to stop this from coming out in the first place. This horse will not go back into any barn any time soon.

One thing we should note in Gov. Perry’s possible defense. Perry has a close friend and hunting partner in former Colorado gubernatorial candidate Scott McInnis–each has bragged about trips hunting with the other, so it’s a reasonable assumption that McInnis has been to, uh, “Niggerhead.” Somebody should ask McInnis if he ever saw the “Niggerhead” sign Perry claims was painted over in the 1980s, right? Did Perry ever mention the sign over a beer on the hunt? Discuss having gotten rid of it? Acknowledged it was a stupid thing for a politician to display?

Don’t ask McInnis if he wrote it, just ask if he ever saw it.

Comments

42 thoughts on ““Niggerhead” Scandal: The End For Perry?

  1. and he’s already running for President and has condemned it.

    Most other Republicans are thinking to themselves that Rick Perry really understands them.

  2. I understand the implications of this story are certainly worthy of discussion on this site, but looking at this webpage right now I count  uses of the term N***head.

    Is that really necessary?

    Perhaps I’m being too sensitive, but it seems a bit hypocritical for CO Pols to condemn Perry for the sign when you feel the need to repeat the name over and over unnecessarily.  

      1. It’s one thing to use the term to explain the story, but after the first use I think we all would understand what is meant if it was just referred to as “the sign” or “the rock”.

        But no, Pols insisted on repeating it and even using the term to take a swipe at Scott McInnis. And does the story really need to be tagged with the term?  

        1. It’s downright vile.

          So yes, it’s appropriate that it be used in a story that is all about same said word.

          If you find this offensive, I highly suggest you stay offline for a couple of days because the story and the word is everywhere and this one isn’t going away.

      1. That would imply they were using it against someone as opposed to merely reporting on its usage. There’s a bit of a difference.

        Way to carry the torch though! May we all have such defenders of our legacy.

          1. McInnis and Perry are widely reported hunting buddies. It is likely that McInnis has been to “N—–head.”

            Perhaps if you don’t like this word, which I don’t, you should work really, really hard to get rid of Republicans who use it. Since I doubt they would be talking about it otherwise?

              1. is in the right place. I just don’t see this being used lightheartedly by anyone.

                It is what it is–an ugly, racist term and sadly enough, it is directly tied to a presidential candidate.  

              2. I didn’t know Pols even HAD a manor! Party at Guvs’ place!

                …seriously though I see your point, cunninjo, it does seem excessive in this blog post. Perhaps two or three fewer iterations would have been ideal, although I do not think that word should be censored in reporting this story, as the story focuses ON Perry’s failure to censor the racist name of his ranch.

  3. Coming on the heels of unsteady debate performances, he didn’t need this.

    I believe it’s unfounded and he removed it when he said he did, but if he wants to save himself a stronger response will be needed.

    I don’t think Perry is who you should be worried about today though.

      1. You’ve got two Northeastern governors, one former and one current looking at the race. Obama fears either one.

        Romney is already beating Obama. If Christie gets in the race, Obama should withdraw while he can save face. The margin of defeat in a Christie vs. Obama race will be a huge embarrassment for the Democrat Party.

        1. Unblemished and without sin, he will lead Republicans to the promised land like Dan Maes.

          Oh brother you must believe the next Republican candidate will be the one.  Or the next one or maybe the one after that.

          Doth appear that Savior Perry was not the one.

    1. that are going to come out of the Republicans closet for quite a while.

      Romney is probably the most vetted but we’ll probably find out a lot more about him and the companies he chopped up and sold while making his fortune at Bain.

      The rest are full of hidden secrets that are going to come out as the opponents do research on each other.

      This is the kind of scrutiny that Obama has already been through and the Ayers story is old old news.  It is an incumbent advantage to have already gone through the vetting process and been stripped naked in public.

      It will be interesting to see how the Republican circus deals with their undressing.  Bachmann disappeared from the charts after the Migraine story.

  4. First, he says he painted over the offensive word with white paint.  Then, he says he turned the stone over.

    Hmmm,  why didn’t he just get rid of the offensive stone (unless, of course, it wasn’t offensive to him).

    PS, why would anyone believe what McIinnis says?

  5. of the offending rock?  I mean we have a description of it, but no photograph?  One would think that such evidence would be at the top of the Posts story.

    1. You can’t see God either but you believe he is instructing you to criminalize womens health care and make half the population of the country wards of a nanny state.

      Pretty selective set of beliefs on what’s real and what isn’t.

        1. colocreep gets cold cocked about his need to see the proof with his own eyes to believe and instead coming back with any kind of a logical reply why, all he/she/it can come back with is “you’re irrational”.

          Everyone admits there was a rock with a racial epithet on it but colocreep won’t accept that because he hasn’t seen it with his own eyes.  I don’t think I’m the one who isn’t tethered to reality.  Reality has a liberal bias because liberals don’t keep trying to deny the facts of this earthly existence.

          1. You can’t see God either but you believe he is instructing you to criminalize womens health care and make half the population of the country wards of a nanny state.

            When you can’t make a coherent argument, make shit up and lather lovingly on your opponent.

            Like I said, what an imagination.

    1. we live in a totally post-ironic age.

      Having said that, I hesitate to agree with you — I’d like to see a picture of the offending rock to inform my own judgment.  No doubt that the rock exists, but I’d kind of like to have an idea as to it’s scale, etc., etc.

      And no, I don’t think this is going to change anyone’s mind about Perry one way or the other.  Perry was bound to lose his high level of initial support, one way or another, as folks came to see him for the shadow he is.  Vetting is a merciless bitch . . .  

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

60 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!