The Hill reporting on the decision by a Republican political action committee specifically devoted to increasing the number of Republican women in Congress to not endorse for re-election in 2022 the “Q-Some Twosome” freshmen: Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Lauren Boebert of Colorado:
“While we rightfully celebrate the number of GOP women serving in the House, I’ve always professed quality over quantity,” VIEWPAC Executive Director Julie Conway told the outlet…
“Our women have fought too hard for too long to be respected and taken seriously as legislators, policy makers and thought leaders. We cannot let this work be erased by individuals who chose to be shameless self promoters and carnival barkers.” [Pols emphasis]
VIEW PAC, which has raised more than $20 million for Republican female candidates since 2010, said it will not be endorsing the Greene or Boebert in the 2022 midterm elections, when both lawmakers will be seeking a second term in Congress.
This is by far the most overt condemnation of Boebert we’ve yet seen from any national Republican interest group, and it’s a sign that Boebert’s Trump-style strategy of dragging the news cycle from one relentless outrage to another may be wearing thin with the GOP establishment–especially with MTG and Boebert now one-upping each other in daily validation of Godwin’s Law.
The problem, of course, is that MTG and Boebert are tapped into the same base of pro-Trump support over which whatever the GOP “mainstream” consists of in 2021 has less control over today than ever before. For all practical purposes, MTG and Boebert under a resurgent ex-President Donald Trump are the party now.
With that said, even in this scathing expression of no confidence from fellow Republican women, Boebert plays second fiddle:
“I think that they would rather draw attention to themselves, and really Marjorie Taylor Greene more than Boebert, but they’re cut from the same cloth,” Conway said, according to Insider.
We’re not sure what’s worse for Boebert–being disavowed by a leading PAC devoted to electing Republican women, or still being merely MTG’s understudy in loathsomeness while it happens? Even in scorn, Boebert just doesn’t measure up to her more bombastic peers.
As for Republicans actually holding Boebert accountable? We’ll see once the 2022 primary (if any) is over.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Easter Weekend Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Easter Weekend Open Thread
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Easter Weekend Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Coloradans Getting Impatient with Trump Destruction of Public Lands
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Easter Weekend Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Easter Weekend Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Easter Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Easter Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Gabe Evans Tells Frightened Families To Embrace Trump’s “Chaos”
BY: ParkHill
IN: Easter Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
This oughta smoke our little fella out of his hole.
Query whether they will support anyone who voted against certifying the electoral votes. If so, then they're no better than the Q-squad.
I'm also interested to hear if the statement "I’ve always professed quality over quantity,” from VIEWPAC Executive Director Julie Conway is going to impact their decision on endorsing and supporting Rep. Cheney.
bing.
Problem is, there is a "sucker born every minute." Someone will fund them.