Romer Nets Mejia Endorsement

(That sound you hear? It’s the Fat Lady. She’s warming up. – promoted by Colorado Pols)

James Mejia will be endorsing Chris Romer in the Denver mayoral race. Romer has been considered the clear frontrunner from the beginning of the campaign for Denver’s next mayor, and this endorsement will only further cement that position in the run-off.

Any hopes of an “anti-Romer” coalition forming have effectively been ruined. As Pols rightly pointed out, the clout of the 29,170 votes Mejia received is undeniable. Considering Romer’s fundraising prowess and ability to hire on additional field staffers, Hancock faces an uphill battle against an opponent who will undoubtedly pick up donations and volunteers from this endorsement.

Of course, it is yet to be seen whether Mejia will actively campaign and convince his supporters to rally behind Romer.

A Mejia endorsement would have been a much needed boost to Michael Hancock’s campaign. He has been on the ropes recently, suffering from an attack from Romer’s campaign as to whether he is “pro-choice” or “pro-family planning”.

Though Mejia is reported to have talked to both candidates over the weekend, it is unclear whether he has a pre-ordained position in a potential Romer administration.  

[poll id=”1340″]

0 Shares

117 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. The only thing further I have to say: I am officially substituting the phrase “Eating the cupcakes” for “Drinking the Kool-Aid” for the foreseeable future.

    Unless there’s a DAMN good explanation, I no longer less than three Mejia. Officially.

    • c rork says:

      Personally, I’ve got no horse in this race. As for a good explanation, I think that Mejia is trying to pick the  winning horse. I’d bet that Mejia gets a nice position (something educationy) out of this and continues to serve the fair citizens of Denver county.

  2. Littletonian says:

    a Mejia supporter who’s planning to vote for Romer.

    • Strong Meija supporter.

      I just like Romer’s warts better than I like Hancock’s

    • TheDeminator says:

      I am casting my ballot for Romer as well.  

    • BlueSkies says:

      This endorsement makes a difference.  I trust Mejia’s judgment.

      I like Hancock.  But, I was actually starting to feel sorry for Romer (only a little) with Susan Barnes-Gelt’s ridiculous and oft-published fawning over Hancock’s niceness advantage.  Hancock’s weird dancing around the evolution question and his lack of outreach to LGBT voters had me wondering about those second-level election issues beyond jobs, economic development, etc.

      Romer’s not perfect, but if he’s good enough for Mejia, I’ll give him a second look.

      • DaftPunkDaftPunk says:

        JK, that was stupid.

        Hancock can’t say “yes” I believe in evolution?  He doesn’t understand that belief in evolution and god aren’t contradictory?  Who is he sucking up to with this answer?  

        I’m sorry, I can’t vote for someone who doesn’t believe in evolution.  The evidence from too many fields of scientific inquiry is too overwhelming, and there are too many well-written books on reconciling faith with evolution for this type of denial to be acceptable to me.

        I know neither of these issues are significant to the job of running Denver, but I have to be intellectually comfortable with my vote, and Hancock can’t get it now.

    • brio says:

      I voted for Mejia.  I haven’t yet made up my mind for certain, but am definitely leaning towards voting Romer over Hancock.  Not feeling great about it, mind you, but am turned off more by Hancock than I am Romer.

      The endorsement has nothing to do with my decision.  I think politicians usually endorse for personal reasons, and couldn’t care less.

    • EmeraldKnight76 says:

      A lot of it had to do with Hancock’s weird dancing around issues like abortion and his lack of outreach to the gay community. This still hadn’t completely decided me as I REALLY wanted Mejia as mayor. Once Mejia endoresed Romer it was a done deal for me.

    • CaninesCanines says:

      Romer was way down on my list of candidates, all in all. I would have rather voted for the UFO guy before Romer. However, Hancock remains lower on my list.

  3. Dan WillisDan Willis says:

    so I will leave it with a Charlie Brown summary: “ARRRRGH!!!”

  4. raymond1 says:

    Asking “Is there a chance that Hancock can come from behind” and musing that “the fat lady is warming up”?  That’s waaaaay premature. Look, I’m still calling my bookie to wager $5 on Romer simply because of his fundraising advantage — but as of now there’s no reason to be certain Romer has the edge:

    1) We’ve seen no Romer-versus-Hancock polls, have we? (I’ll stand corrected and withdraw this entire comment if there is some poll showing Romer substantially ahead.)

    2) Romer and Hancock weren’t all that far apart in the results last Tuesday.

    3) I’d guess that lots of the 70% non-Romer voters dislike Romer, whereas many of the 75% non-Hancock voters don’t affirmatively dislike Hancock.

    • droll says:

      Number 3, where’d ya come up with that?

      As far as this site goes, politically active and everything, I’m seeing a nearly 50/50 split from Mejia to one or the other. And the most vehement Romer haters hate BOTH. Which makes them more likely to sit out.

      Surprised? Kind of. Utterly shocked? No. Bad for your numbers? Yeah.

      If we assume anything like a 50/50, Hancock has to make up the numbers. Or… come from behind.

      I hate Romer, too. But this is a political blog. Not a commercial and not a wishing well. Romer has a clear advantage. Many of them in fact.

      • raymond1 says:

        Try to read what I said rather than skim it & move on to lame attempts to be witty with trite cliches. You wrote:

        … this is a political blog. Not a commercial and not a wishing well.

        Stoop, I’m clearly a Hancock guy, and in saying I’d still bet on Romer, I’m (a) not posting my “wishing” and (b)  certainly not posting any sort of “commercial” the Hancock folks would like.

        All I’m saying is that Pols is making an overly confident prediction, whereas I see good bit of uncertainty here because: while Romer has the money, I perceive more anti-Romer sentiment than anti-Hancock sentiment. In a runoff that’s about “which guy can become the second choice of the 55% who voted for someone else,” a big factor is who has stronger unfavorable ratings. I perceive that to be Romer — but I called that a “guess,” not a “prediction,” because as I expressly noted, I haven’t seen polling yet.

  5. “Over a year ago I entered the Mayoral campaign because after a decade of serving the last two Mayors, I believe I have a perspective and ideas that can best serve Denver.  Throughout the campaign I believe that some of those ideas were embodied by precise, specific and well written policies to Move Denver Forward.  I am very proud of my team that took a relatively unknown candidate to receiving over 26% of the vote in this campaign.  

    The most politically expedient decision in the race is to not endorse one of the remaining two candidates.  We ran a highly respected race and if I were to stay out of the race, it wouldn’t create any ill will.  But I talked to my campaign team and family about it, and this is a team decision.  We entered the Mayoral race because of our ideas for Denver and now we see a clear way of implementing those programs and policies.

    I know Michael Hancock well.  We have known each other for 20 years and I respect his work and his career.  I also know Chris Romer and the Romer family.  Chris’ brother Tom and I went to high school together.  But this isn’t about who I know best, this is about who is best equipped to move Denver forward.

    In their endorsement, the Denver Post mentioned that there are two candidates ready to be Mayor – me and Chris Romer.  Now, only Chris Romer remains in the race and I unequivocally support his candidacy to become the next mayor of Denver.

    Our campaigns will merge completely, I will take a prominent role in Chris Romer’s mayoral bid and together we will ensure that Denverites are put back to work, that Denver is positioned as the sustainability capital of the West, that our world-class city has a world-class education system, and that we maintain our excellent arts and culture system.

    I look forward to working with Chris Romer and wholeheartedly support his campaign to become the next Mayor of

    Denver.

    Respectfully,

    James Mejia”

    Where’s my dislike button? This update lacks the words “Deputy Mayor” and has therefore failed to appease me.

    • reubenesp says:

      My team likes Romer better cuz he has lots of bucks to pay us with.

      I personally like Romer better cuz he promised me a really good job.

      I almost expect Romanoff to join too.

      • droll says:

        Let me read between your lines:

        I know nothing about Denver politics.

        I stir up random shit because I have too much time on my hands and am very, very lonely. 🙁

        Please help me,

        reubenesp

        Close, or perfect?

      • TheDeminator says:

        I think it is beyond commendable that James Mejia asked his staff where they would want to go?  Do you think Carol asked her team if she should back Hancock.

        I was in the room, the team wanted to go over to Romer without a thought as a team.  I am personally choosing not to go over to anyone’s team but I would much rather pick Romer as mayor over Hancock.  

        Enjoy trying to discredit one of the most honest, thoughtful and classy people I have ever had the chance to work for in politics.

        As for the race, with Mejia’s team on board it’s over for Hancock.  It closes the gap with minorities and women.  

      • redstateblues says:

        Wow.

        Ok, first of all I could not support Romer personally, but you’re a piece of shit.

        My friends at the Mejia team had their own reasons for wanting to go to Romer, and none of it had to do with money. I can also say that James Mejia did not want to go to Romer for a job, or money, or anything else you’re trying to insinuate. He wanted to go to whoever he thought would help fulfill his (IMO brilliant) vision for the South Platte and for helping to promote buying Denver-made products.

        I personally will be supporting Michael Hancock, though not as a member of his staff. I also happen to have a tremendous amount of respect for the Mejia team, and I was proud to be a part of that team.

        You, reuben, are not worthy to lick their canvass walking shoes.

        • Fidel's dirt nap says:

          I am really disappointed in the decision, but having known James for years I would be inclined to believe it is completely above the board.

          I fucking hate it.  But it is totally James’ call (and he even shared that with his team), and unfounded insinuations about why are just that – unfounded insinuations.

          • redstateblues says:

            I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again, we really lost out not having him as Denver Mayor for the next four years.

            I disagree with him on this endorsement, but he knows that I have a tremendous amount of respect for him, and I’m looking forward to working with him again the next time he’s a candidate.

            That said, I hope his new political buddy gets crushed by Michael Hancock next month.

            • TheDeminator says:

              🙂  Let the shills, trash talkers and overall sofa quarterbacks know that we will defend Mr. Mejia and squash any attempts to attack him.  

              • I mean, not me personally, in Denver elections, ’cause I don’t live in Denver. But I’m just saying. You come off like you think people who don’t work in politics should just sit down and shut up, but if they don’t get involved and excited, will they vote, volunteer, talk to their neighbors…?

                If RSB says Mejia made this move for all the right reasons I’ll accept the heartbreak after a mourning period (which will conveniently last until just after the runoff is over). But don’t get all huffy with people for having an opinion, eh? Reuben’s being an ass, but two asses aren’t better than one.

                • TheDeminator says:

                  I am not saying you cannot have an opinion but to try and smear someone because they think they know what is going is not up for debate.

                  I do wish many of the folks on here who comment would try working on a race full time for a cycle before they claim to know what works and what does not.

                  We all have our own opinions and if mine make me an ass so be it.

                  • David with his tech company, anyone who’s unemployed, anyone who works in health care, every teacher ever… personally, I think quite a few of them could use some equibusiness experience, but it’s a pretty low priority below understanding the more volatile issues.

                    We’re all voicing opinions without the experience to back it up–the non political types when we comment on politics, and the political staffers/candidates when they make and support policies. It’s just really not all that worth fighting about. If there’s something factually inaccurate, dispute it, but nobody’s ever going to fully understand your job (even if they DO work in politics) any more than you fully understand theirs.

                • Middle of the Road says:

                  was his assumption that Mejia’s team joined with Romer’s out of promise of being paid. That’s what Reuben asserted and that’s pretty out of line. Why Mejia endorsed Romer is anybody’s guess but making out that anyone that worked for him is just a money hungry campaign jumper is pretty insulting, particularly since I know some of the staff personally.  

                  • Deminator’s response just rubbed me the wrong way, in conjunction with his various and sundry previous statements implying that nobody who isn’t working on a campaign has any business opinion about ’em.

                    All for RSB and droll’s responses, though.  

                    • TheDeminator says:

                      It’s what I do, I rub people the wrong way.   Anyone on here can tell you that.  

                    • But at least you don’t get offended when people push back. You just happen to particularly get my goat (odd, since usually a friend of Mejia is a friend of mine, even though I do not love Mejia at the moment). One of my pet peeves is the elitist campaign staffer. Y’all ask people to work a lot of hours for you for free. A less patronizing ‘tude would improve that sales pitch.

                      (I know, you’re not a field organizer, so you sort of get a pass.)

                    • TheDeminator says:

                      I knocked plenty of doors this round and came from the field world but yeah voters stress me out so I stick to raising dollars.    

                      We elitist campaign staffers sometimes have pet peeves with you know it all volunteers as well.  🙂 That is me trying to be funny for those who have not met me out in the world.

                      Relax have a beer, Romer or Hancock they both will be weak suckie mayors and I look forward to whomever wins deciding they want to take on Degette so James can run again.

                    • Raising a cuppa coffee, though–I’m a teetotaler, why do you think you never catch me in any semblance of “relaxed” mode? 🙂

                      Whenever Mejia-redux happens, I’m on board. I’ll be over the Romer thing by then.

      • polssux says:

        …where is the like button for Reuben’s comment?

  6. Is there the likelihood of a Hickenlooper endorsement in this race?  Any thinking on which way that would go?

    • redstateblues says:

      I don’t see it happening, but I do give Romer a better chance at it than Hancock. Though Hancock voted with Hick 95% of the time, I think Hick would rather have Romer as an ally if he ever ran for President.

    • Middle of the Road says:

      The negatives of pissing off one group of supporters or another outweighs any benefits for him.

      In fact, I don’t see any benefits for Hick inserting himself into the Mayor’s race. If he runs for higher office, he’ll have the support of whomever wins this one so why take the chance of alienating a core group of supporters?  

    • polssux says:

      Since he is a rich Republican – I mean, corporatist Dem – he would endorse the other Republican, Romer – I mean, corporatist Dem.

      • Brian5064 says:

        But he won’t endorse him. As others have mentioned, it would make him seem a bit silly and risk ticking people off.

        I doubt he’d be all that thrilled if Hancock wins. I’ve heard Hancock say a couple of times recently that more or less “Denver has been without a mayor for the past year.”

        I’m sure that miffed the Hickster just a bit.

  7. redstateblues says:

    Mejia’s endorsement is huge, but it’s still going to be a tight race.

    Fundamentally, both candidates will have money to wage the air wars. Now, with mejia’s team, Romer will have the ability to start waging a better ground war. However, the ground advantage still goes to Hancock–whose field team did an outstanding job of GOTV, and that work definitely gave them the edge in the final few weeks of the general.

    Get out your popcorn, folks, this one just got interesting.

  8. polssux says:

    Haha, err. I think this article was written in a cubicle somewhere before a check to see which way the wind was blowing. Lots of Mejia supporters I talked to today were fuming and will not go with Romer. Five are pavement-stompers for Mejia and see him as an opportunist – for himself, not for the agenda at-large. Romer’s values don’t align with the Mejia supporters I know, so I am not of the mind that people are going to sheeple out.

    Hancock should make Romer’s shady banking practices front and center.

  9. Brian5064 says:

    I don’t know if it would be considered good, bad or somewhere in-between, but he is still one of the best known Dems in the state and as a former Denver DA obviously has strong ties to the city. I know Jeannie Ritter endorsed Hancock. I wonder what her husband thinks!

    • TheDeminator says:

      Does anyone truly care what Bill Ritter thinks?

      • I think Penry’s endorsement in this election will sway more voting than Ritter’s would/will.

        • Middle of the Road says:

          I mean, I really don’t get how anybody would support Romer, knowing Penry is endorsing him. And knowing that Romer is touting that endorsement.

          I’d love someone that plans to vote for Romer explain that one to me. (Someone sane, I might add.)

          • TheDeminator says:

            16% of the republicans or so who voted cared. I am shocked Hancock is not nailing Romer’s ass to the wall over it but he’s claiming he’s staying positive.

            It’s beyond easy to paint Romer as a big banker supported by R’s

            • Middle of the Road says:

              I’ve been on this site long enough for most people to know I’m a Dem so I guess I assumed that was a given in the comment.

              So, since you’re now supporting Romer and I consider you sane, I’ll ask you: how does this not bother you or factor into your vote?

              • TheDeminator says:

                One of them is going to be the mayor… like it or not. ( and I work in Politics I am far from being sane)  

                Chris Romer has some solid ideas for the city, can attract business and can call on some powerful favors because of his father when it comes to govt favors.  

                The one thing I do like is that Romer is looking at what the other folks in the race said and is taking some of their ideas and is planning on implementing them. ( and is giving full credit)  I think he will take some of Mejia’s ideas and put them to use not only in the campaign but also as Mayor.  

                He comes off to me as someone who will surround himself with thinkers and may know he’s not the brightest bulb in the box

                I personally feel that Michael Hancock has little to no substance, says what people want to hear to get him elected and I do not trust his word.  Hancock’s Policy papers were always 1 – 3 weeks behind Mejia’s and were on almost the same topic with very little thought. Plus Hancock has always surround himself with folks I personally find are using him to get to higher places on his coat tails.

                Does the fact Republicans are backing Romer upset me, not really because Romer was a bridge builder in the Senate.  He works well with those folks, I think his Republican support shows he can cross the way and use some good Republican ideas in his platform.

                Romer and Hancock will be liberal / left leaning mayors.

            • harrydobyharrydoby says:

              Hmmm, Maybe Hancock Can Pass That Message Along.. but in a positive way 😉

              Gotta admit, I’m really disappointed that Mejia went for Romer.  Won’t change my vote for Hancock, however.  

    • TheDeminator says:

      Ritter is jumping in behind Hancock. Not sure what that does but there is your answer.  

  10. sloanslake says:

    many folks I know find neither Romer or Hancock palatable – because of this I predict historic low voter turnout for the runoff election

  11. John Tzekara says:

    …and you miss all the excitement.  I was commenting regularly over at Denver Pols on the municipal races, but ended up being out of town for the election (yes I mailed in my ballot).  

    As someone who finally decided on Mejia, I was really disappointed with the results (obviously).  His endorsement of Senator Romer will make me take another look at the guy.  I had dismissed both Romer and Hancock as options for my support, but I guess one of them will have to be mayor.

    I don’t understand the hate on here for Mejia’s decision.  Obviously he was going to go for one or the other, and it sounded like he really look his time sitting down with both.  That seems in sharp contrast to Linkhart, who jumped on with Hancock right away (and I haven’t heard from since).

    • RedGreenRedGreen says:

      Linkhart made his endorsement Friday, Mejia made his on Monday. How is one “right away” and the other “really took his time”? Both of them spent four months in near daily contact with the other candidates, and they both had lengthy sit-downs with them after the election.  

  12. AParsons says:

    I may have to sit out this election.

    Mejia was the lesser of evils for me. Hancock and evolution? Anyone who denies simple science scares me. Where do you think your dog and cat came from?

    Romer… Hates MMJ. I don’t partake, but all of the closed down stores around me are now humming small businesses, and gangs have less power. I feel Romer is too conservative for this city.

    Both candidates have little regard for the opinions of teachers. They will have to work hard to convince me to support either one of them.  

  13. polssux says:

    I’ll take being called a shill and a pain-in-the —. But you can now call me “correct”.

    🙂

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.