President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) J. Sonnenberg

(R) Ted Harvey

20%↑

15%↑

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Doug Bruce

20%

20%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

40%↑

20%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 04, 2011 03:56 AM UTC

House Republicans Finally Notice Their Own Disaster

  • 9 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

As our friends at The Washington Post report, somebody finally talked some sense into tone-deaf House Republicans:

Republican lawmakers have removed the term “forcible rape” from an antiabortion bill in Congress after women’s groups accused them of trying to change the widely held definition of rape.

The bill, called the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, seeks to permanently bar federal funds from being used to subsidize abortions. It allows exceptions in cases in which the pregnancy resulted from incest or when the life of the mother would be threatened if the fetus was carried to term.

In the original language, it also allowed exceptions in cases of “forcible rape.” The term provoked an outcry from critics, who said rape is by definition committed by force and that lawmakers were seeking to exclude from coverage certain kinds of rape by adding the modifier – for example, cases in which the victim was underage or unconscious.

The bill now echoes existing law by taking out the term “forcible” and excepting all cases of rape.

A spokesman for Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.), a chief sponsor of the bill, said Thursday that they decided to change the term because it was being “misconstrued.” [Pols emphasis]

There he is! We haven’t seen this guy in quite awhile — the old “misconstrued defense.” The “misconstrued defense” is a close relative of the classic “rogue staffer” blame game and the fraternal twin of the “I apologize if you were offended” non-apology apology.

We didn’t do something horribly insensitive — you just misconstrued what we said! Since YOU can’t seem to understand what we really meant, we’ll just go ahead and change it.

Come 2012, we’ll have to remember to ask Reps. Cory Gardner and Scott Tipton if the “misconstrued defense” is making those attack ads any less effective against them.

Comments

9 thoughts on “House Republicans Finally Notice Their Own Disaster

  1. and “forcible rape” illumination.

    Please continue to shine a light on these foibles of the right-wing brouhaha machine.

    It keeps me coming back to this site.

    1. My wife’s little house plants went nuts over the holiday season with all that low southern sun.

      Can man invent shades of pink any better than this?

  2. The “forcible rape” provision was the shiny eye candy designed to distract us from the fact that this bill, minus that provision, is still a nasty expansion over the current Hyde amendment which has to be renewed every year.

    All of a sudden, Democrats caught up in the glory of having the Republican extremist position removed from the bill, will be happier to sign on to what amounts to a permanent version of the original, completely unacceptable, Stupak-Pitts amendment from last year’s HCR debate.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

202 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!