Dems Eye Acting Federal Lands Chief Over Possible Misconduct

(Promoted by Colorado Pols)

William Perry Pendley, Acting Director Bureau of Land Management

By Gabriella Novello for the Colorado Times Recorder

WASHINGTON, D.C

William Perry Pendley is still leading the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the federal agency in charge of most public lands, and has spent the past few weeks rotating between Washington, DC, and the agency’s new headquarters in Grand Junction, Colo.

But, the so-called “sagebrush rebel” has also been operating as the director of the BLM without Senate approval.

House Democrats voted last week in favor of allowing the House Natural Resources Committee chair Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) to subpoena the BLM for documents relating to “mismanagement, waste, fraud, abuse, and wrongful conduct” within the Interior Department — including Pendley’s push to relocate the agency’s headquarters to Colorado.

“Moving an agency’s headquarters poses a direct threat to funding, expertise, and access to decision-makers on Capitol Hill,” the committee’s Democrats wrote in a Medium post following the vote, accusing Pendley of being an “anti-government, anti-federal employee ideologue.”

“The new headquarters is now near Secretary Bernhardt’s hometown, in the same building as several oil and gas companies. This is ‘efficient’ only if you’re trying to dismantle the agency and undermine its mission,” the committee’s Democrats wrote.

In July, the Colorado Times Recorder requested documents from the Interior Department under the Freedom of Information Act regarding Sen. Cory Gardner’s (R-CO) role in the relocation effort, including correspondence between Gardner and Secretaries Ryan Zinke or David Bernhardt. The Interior Department has yet to respond other than by acknowledging the request.

Pendley’s relationship with the fossil fuel industry raises concerns among environmental groups and Democratic lawmakers. As the long-time president of the Mountain States Legal Foundation, a conservative advocacy group based in Colorado, Pendley built a reputation among Colorado conservatives by suing the Department of the Interior to ease environmental protections and advocate for the selling of public lands.

Members of the Sierra Club protest Pendley.

Pendley has a long and controversial history with the Interior Department. Notably, during the Reagan administration, he served under anti-environmentalist Secretary of Interior James Watt and was fired after allegations that he was selling coal resources at the Powder River Basin at a $100 million loss to taxpayers.

Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO) told the Colorado Times Recorder in a statement that Pendley is “the last person who should be running the BLM.”

“Coloradans place enormous value on our public lands – because they serve as the backbone of our economy,” Bennet said. “Put simply, Mr. Pendley’s record advocating for the sale or transfer of our public lands – our economy – demonstrates just how out of touch he is with our values.”

Pendley’s appointment as acting BLM chief without a Senate confirmation process also underscores a larger trend for the administration: regulatory watchdog agencies that focus on the environment and addressing climate change are being defanged and led by industry leaders with little oversight.

In July 2019, Interior Department Secretary David Bernhardt appointed Pendley to deputy director for policy and planning at the BLM. After one month, Bernhardt appointed Pendley acting director.

Many Trump administration positions requiring Senate confirmation have yet to be filled. Some agencies continue to operate under acting directors who have not been formally nominated or given a confirmation hearing. A number of environmental groups, like the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), have raised concerns about Pendley’s appointment because of his strong positions against climate change and other issues.

“It is pretty clear why Mr. Pendley has not been formally nominated for the Director’s position,” Andrew Rosenberg, UCS’ director of the Center for Science & Democracy, wrote after Pendley’s tenure was extended for a second time. “His extreme, ultra-conservative views and deep conflicts of interest would not win him confirmation in the Senate.”

The BLM oversees about 12 percent of all public lands in the United States, mostly in western states, and manages roughly 4,500 oil and gas leases. The agency is still in the process of relocating its headquarters, but lawmakers have criticized the move and question BLM’s unusually brief details about it.

0 Shares

One Community Comment, Facebook Comments

  1. JohnInDenverJohnInDenver says:

    Last week, I went looking for more info on the move to Grand Junction.  Published reports were pretty sparse.

    BLM relocated its HQ to Grand Junction, CO.  27 jobs was the annuonced count.  It did NOT include the Director’s office (now filled by an “Acting Director”)  The move was part of a larger push to get BLM staff out of DC.

    • The Director’s office (now an “Acting Director” until at least April 3) and ~30 immediate staff will stay in DC.
    • E&E News reported that up to 80% of those reassigned to the West rejected the order — retirements, shifting to other DC jobs, or resigning from the agency & fed. government entirely.
    • One specific group of 25 had 3 accept the move.
    • High Country News article said “as of early December, 30 employees had already been reassigned to other government jobs in Washington, while only two staffers were in their new positions in the West.”
    • Some retired or resigned, but were then brought back on as “contractors.”
    • “headquarters” (without the Director or immediate staff) moved to Grand Junction, CO. 
    • “some BLM senior leaders plan to rotate between Washington, D.C., and Grand Junction on two-week shifts.”
    • I keep looking for a published report on how many staff came to the Grand Junction — initial count was 27 positions, then the estimate rose to 40 “eventually.”  At one point, there were 15 advertised openings.
    • The Grand Junction rented space is in an office building — other occupants include local offices of Laramie Energy, Chevron, and the Colorado Oil and Gas Association.

    The House committee overseeing the BLM “sent 26 formal requests for information to the department, but Chairman Rep. Raúl Grijalva, D-Ariz., received complete responses only twice.”  BLM says lots was sent over.  Some of what was provided was redacted. So, subpoenas have been issued.

    Anyone have more reporting on the Grand Junction office, particularly how many people stayed with the BLM and moved?

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.