CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese



President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump



CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*


CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*


CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks




CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg




CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Bob Gardner




CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*


CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen



CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi




State Senate Majority See Full Big Line





State House Majority See Full Big Line





Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 10, 2010 12:40 AM UTC

Ballot Returns Updated for Today

  • by: Colorado Pols

POLS NOTE: In order to make comments easier to read and understand, we decided to create a new post for these returns, rather than just updating the original post.

Below are the turnout numbers reported a little after 3:00 p.m. today by the SOS. Remember that there is some lag time in the reporting process (in other words, there are more ballots returned than what is listed below, but what is listed below is what the various County Clerks reported to the SOS today):

*Party/ Ballots Returned Thus Far/ Total Active Voters/ Percent Returned

Democrats: 279,462/ 817,458/ 34%

Republicans: 314,264/ 855,667/ 37%

Richard Coolidge of the Secretary of State’s office also included this note in today’s ballot update:

Colorado County clerks may begin processing (not tabulating) ballots 15 days before the election. All 64 counties should have a good sample of mail ballots tabulated after 7:00pm tomorrow evening. Remember, 46 counties are voting exclusively by mail, so ballots received Tuesday may not be included in that original release of results. The remaining 18 counties will still have mail results, but will also need to factor in votes cast at precinct polling places (like El Paso, Pitkin, Las Animas, etc) or at vote centers (like Weld, Park, Archuleta, etc).

Our read on these numbers? The Michael Bennet campaign is going to be sweating it out tomorrow, hoping to see turnout reach levels cross well into the 300,000 level (the higher the turnout above 300,000, the better the odds that Bennet wins).

As for the GOP turnout, we’re curious to see how big the undervote might be. Turnout is pretty high already considering the amount of grumbling from Republicans over their (lack of) great choices for Governor, and to a lesser extent, U.S. Senate, but if most of the returned ballots are casting a vote in the race for Governor and Senate, this benefits Scott McInnis and Jane Norton in their respective races.


37 thoughts on “Ballot Returns Updated for Today

    1. I would guess it’s more due to the Democrats having one statewide primary vs. three statewide primaries and two congressional primaries on the GOP side.

  1. The Bennet campaign is going to be sweating it out tomorrow, hoping to see turnout reach levels that more closely resemble the Republican numbers.

    The percentages are ballots returned / total active voters.  They include unaffiliateds, and total active voters has no relationship to ballots sent.


      1. The formula changed this year.

        Here’s a note I got from Mesa County:

        * Reason for change in voter turnout

        Previously, we have reported turnout based on active affiliated voters as directed.  Today, July 30, 2010, our office received notice from the Secretary of State that the official abstract will reflect turnout based on active affiliated and unaffiliated voters.

      1. Because AR is thought to enjoy the support of party activists.  These people will always vote in the primary, good years or bad.  MB needs the so-called “Lazy Ds” who may skip a primary or two, and newly minted Obama dems, to counteract that effect.

        Low turnout = The Old Guard

        High turnout = More of a mixture

        1. turnout #s vs. party affiliation – now sounds as though we are in fact getting SOS figures showing turnout as a % of registered D/R voters.

          Understand the logic of + turnout good for MB. just wondering where the 300k ‘threshold’ comes from.

          In any event, looks as though that figure will be well surpassed.  

          1. Would be more than 100,000 Democratic ballots than were cast in 2008. Basically, it’s an entire third of the electorate. If the first 200,000 voters were fairly even in selecting Bennet or Romanoff, the new 100,000 voters (new as of 2008) are much more likely to swing for Bennet, which is how 300,000 becomes a theoretical tipping point.

            1. are more likely to be for Bennet, and that 300k Dem votes represents a theoretical tipping point) then, given the Dem votes reported this afternoon are only ~22,000 votes shy of that 300k threshold – and more ballots are still in the mail, with more voting to come tomorrow – Michael Bennet wins handily.

              Not sure I fully subscribe to the hypothesis – though I’d LIKE to believe in its inevitable conclusion.

            2. Bennetpols propaganda, pure and simple. At least try to keep some measure of impartiality so your posts won’t be taken as the tripe they seem to be.

              Bennet is the establishment candidate. Romanoff the insurgent. Bennet enjoys the support of all the party insiders and power brokers, Romanoff the support of the workers and activists.

              Andrew will get the grass roots votes which will put the swing in his favor.

              Let’s see tomorrow night who was right.

          2. I try to never confuse correlation with causation.

            The Dem returns are less than the R returns.

            But the Dems have fewer contested races, so intuition would tell you that interest might be lower.

            The other thing is, what else might be causing the lower D turnout?  I got a call last Thursday from the Bennet campaign asking if I had returned my ballot yet.  I said Yes, and haven’t gotten a call since.  Could the lower Dem turnout be a result of an anemic GOTV effort by the Romanoff campaign?  I can’t say.

            Without knowing WHY the Dem turnout is lower, I am loathe to ascribe significance to it.

  2. today. Dropped it off at the Adams County elections office.

    This was as exhausting emotionally as 2008 primary. No, I take that back. Obama/Clinton and CD2 primary in 2008 was much more stressful/exhausting.

    Either Andrew Romanoff or Michael Bennet will serve us well in the Senate!

          1. I’ve agreed that “looted” was a lie and that the robocall was total bullshit. But there have been very few on here that have been willing to admit that their candidate is imperfect.

            I do give props to MADCO who was up front about it stating that giving ammunition to the opposition is not a smart thing to do.

                1. financial reform. Do think he does not yet realized just how screwed up Wall Street Banking is. Do believe he has  more capacity for coming around while obviously having the knowledge to grasp the complexities enough to do some good work in the area.  On the other hand I think  Romanoff’s intentions are very good but he just doesn’t have a clue how it all works and therefore would be much more prone to being sold nice populist sounding solutions with unintended consequences stemming from the details.  

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments

Posts about

Donald Trump

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo

Posts about

Colorado House

Posts about

Colorado Senate

27 readers online now


Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!