Most people are familiar with Colorado Springs’ struggles with just about everything civically, earning it the endearing nickname ‘Somalia Springs.’ Terry Tamminen at CNBC did an interesting analysis on recent budget cuts in Lexington, MA versus Colorado Springs regarding street lights to show that not all budget cuts are created equally.
…On the dimmer side of this tale, Colorado Springs has turned off one third of its streetlights in an effort to save money in these times of tight government budgets. Not only has this already led to complaints about public safety, it hasn’t solved the problem.
The town is also laying off police officers and selling police helicopters, potentially aggravating the crimes those resources previously prevented and incurring more costs for taxpayers in the long run. How many cops would still be on the beat in Colorado Springs if its leaders had cut street light costs by 75 percent-without turning off a single lamp-and applied those savings to the police department?
http://www.cnbc.com/id/38622533
The analysis shows why it is important to have progressive leaders making decisions in local government. While Lexington may be laying out more money in the short term, they are saving a lot more in the long run in addition to creating jobs, enhancing safety in their community, and reducing their carbon footprint. Even if all the money is going to Al Gore, as the conspiracy theorists may believe, at least he is creating jobs.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Gabe Evans’ Medicaid Dodge Deconstructed By Conservative-Friendly Reporter
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: bullshit!
IN: Gabe Evans’ Medicaid Dodge Deconstructed By Conservative-Friendly Reporter
BY: bullshit!
IN: Gabe Evans Inexplicably Follows Bad Cory Gardner Playbook
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: Early Worm
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
.
NOT.
Lexington has like 42 residents. Average income is around $200K and taxes about triple those in the Springs.
Their idea of cutbacks is to lay off the masseuse who gave city council members free massages.
Or another brilliant cutback: spend more money today to save money in 4 years.
Bensberg and Bennet could run Lexington in their spare time, for all the brains behind decisions like that.
Out of money ? No problem. Raise taxes, since Taxachusetts doesn’t have TABOR.
So, which is better, apples or oranges, in a head-to-head comparison ?
.
Lexington also has 30,000 residents FYI, average income of $120k and taxes are only 5% (the Springs are 2.5%). And in regards to the city council massages…how do you know this much about Lexington, MA? I can’t even google that.
Anyways, the point of the comparison (which by nature is examining two different subjects and comparing their like qualities) is to show how there are different ways to cut costs. Some, like Lexingtons, may cost slightly more in the short term but have better long term returns. Others, like the Springs, look better in the short term but are not nearly as good in the long run. With the current uproar on the Bush Tax Cut expiration, I think this is a good real-world microcosm example of why extending the tax cuts may not be the best use of that money.
.
Born about 10 miles away. My parents were born about 5 and 8 miles from there.
Living there is really different than living here.
But I made that up about the massages.
.
Hey, this day in age it sounded highly believable. Actually, now that I think about it, that is pretty tame for a political scandal. Most people wouldn’t even bat an eye at that after all we’ve seen.