CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

50%↑

15%

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Dave Williams

60%↑

40%↓

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

40%↑

20%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 06, 2010 08:39 PM UTC

The Truth of the Matter

  • 18 Comments
  • by: peacemonger

Buried in the comments of another blog is an entire well-written diary by former DPS board member Jill Conrad. It needs to be read:

The Truth of the Matter

by Jill Conrad

I’m all for raising important questions (as I and other board members did in 2008) about major financial and other policy decisions. What disappoints me is the ways in which the facts have been intentionally distorted in many of the blogs and articles I have read on the subject in the last several months. Despite the great reputation (and my own respect for the NYT), I am shocked by the lack of attention to detail and contextual information in the Morgenson article. Here is my take…and an account of at least 18 factual errors in the article…

A. DPS achieved three critical goals with this transaction: we funded the pension in order to allow us to merge with PERA, by merging with PERA we achieved portability, and we added back $20M to schools (previous cuts had been over $80M)

B. Last Friday (7/30) PERA released the CAFR (independent audit) of current funding levels and projected funding: DPS is funded at 88% as of 12/31/09 and will achieve full funding in 2031, 22 years. PERA/school division is funded at 70% with full funding at 2040. Clearly this has had the right effect, financially for DPS employees and academically for today’s kids and teachers.

C. The article is full of inaccuracies and misleading uses of data: I count at least 18 factual errors in this poorly researched and highly slanted article:

1. “Since it struck the deal, the school system has paid $115 million in interest and other fees, at least $25 million more than it originally anticipated.” – Actually, the district has realized $20 million in savings to date compared to not having done the transaction.

2. “While it is possible that the annual costs of the Denver deal will come down in the future, they are now roughly in line with what the school system would have paid in a fixed-rate transaction.” Not true. Fixed rate debt cost 7.25%. DPS is now paying 6.1%

3. “In the end, a deal that JPMorgan said would have an interest rate of around 5 percent spiked to 8.59 percent during its first fiscal year, and has since settled down to an average rate of 7.12 percent today.”

4. To the contrary, the all in cost including all fees of the transaction was projected and budgeted at between 5.75% and 6%, not 5%, at the time the deal was approved. DPS is now paying 6.1% inclusive of all fees, not 7.12% . The cost did spike to 8.59%, inclusive of all fees, during the 2008-09 fiscal year.

5. “And for years, the school system had not met its required annual pension payments to ensure a fully funded plan; by 2007, the school system faced a $400 million gap.” False. With very few and not economically material exceptions the district had made all required annual payments for years. The pension was underfunded because of the 2000 – 2002 market crash.

6. “The Denver schools essentially made the same choice some homeowners make: opting for a variable-rate mortgage that offered lower monthly payments, with the risk that they could rise.” To the contrary, the rate was fixed via the interest rate hedge or “swap” transaction the article later criticizes. The transaction structure is the opposite of a variable rate mortgage where the homeowner is subject to rises and falls in interest rates.

7. “Rather than issue a plain-vanilla bond with a fixed interest rate, Denver followed its bankers’ suggestion and issued so-called pension certificates with a derivative attached. Together, $750 million was raised using the riskier pension certificates.” This is inaccurate and misleading. Regardless of whether the pension debt was fixed or variable rate, the debt would still have been in the form of pension certificates of participation. There was no option of a “plain vanilla bond”. In 1997, we issued fixed rate pension certificates of participation. In 2005 and 2008, we issued variable rate pension certificates of participation, in both cases with a very commonly used interest rate hedge, the “derivative” the article refers to.

8. “To avoid mounting expenses, the Denver schools are looking to renegotiate the deal.” False. Expenses are not mounting. Expenses have declined considerably. Our current all-in costs, including interest and fees, is 6.1%.

9. “And had the school district issued fixed-rate debt, it would not have paid Wall Street the cornucopia of fees embedded in the more complex deal.” Actually, the fees up would have been the same whether the debt was fixed or variable. Ongoing fees were budgeted from the beginning and are all included in calculating the $20 million in savings thus far.

10. “Unlike many school district officials, both men were financially sophisticated and had worked together in the private sector.” False. Bennet and Boasberg have never worked together in the private sector.

11. “Like a homeowner, Denver essentially started out with the equivalent of a standard, fixed-rate mortgage that allowed it to refinance if interest rates fell.” False. Denver’s 1997 fixed-rate pcops could not be refinanced. There were no call provisions in the 1997 pcops or ability to refinance if interest rates fell.

12. “Moreover, refinancing was extremely costly, given the hefty termination fees.” False. There are no termination fees per se. There is a make-whole provision that runs both in favor of and against the banks (and DPS). DPS has the sole option to terminate the swap, which is priced based on publicly quoted Bloomberg rates. If interest rates rise, then the banks owe a termination fee to DPS should DPS choose to terminate. if interest rates fall, then DPS owes a termination fee to the banks. The make-whole fees are exactly the same in either direction.

13. “Agreeing to be locked into a 30-year contract, as public entities have done, is especially costly because getting out of it requires paying penalties to the banks for every remaining year of the transaction.” False. There are no penalties for remaining years of the transaction. There is a make-whole provision that runs both in favor of and against the banks as described in the previous para.

14. “Like the punishing prepayment penalties some homeowners have to come up with when paying off a mortgage early, termination fees on deals like Denver’s are essentially charges levied to rewrite the terms of a contract.” False. There are no charges levied to rewrite the terms of the contract, only the make-whole provision described above. If interest rates rise, the banks owe a termination fee to DPS.

15. “The pension turned in a dismal performance in the credit crisis – as was the case with most such funds – losing almost twice the $400 million borrowed by the school district to plug the pension gap. As a result, the school system’s pension shortfall recently stood at around $386 million, only slightly lower than it was two years ago, and even though $400 million had been funneled into it in 2008.” Article does not mention that absent the $400 million contribution to the pension in 2008, the current pension shortfall would be twice as large as it currently is.

16. “While the pension’s merger with the state system allows Denver’s school system to avoid paying interest on shortfalls, that benefit is temporary. If a shortfall still exists in 2015, the merger requires that it be closed.” False. DPS must continue to pay interest on the shortfall, which is known as a UAAL payment. Article fails to note that Cavanaugh and Macdonald, the independent auditor to PERA, the state pension fund, have projected the DPS pension fund will be 140% funded at the end of the current 30-year project period. The auditor also found that the district’s pension fund was significantly better funded than the statewide division and all of the other school districts, and would be fully funded years before the rest of the school division would be.

17. “Boasberg maintains that the deal has allowed Denver to hire teachers while other school districts are cutting back. But Henry Roman, president of the Denver Classroom Teachers Association, said that fewer teachers had been hired this year than in previous years.” This is remarkably misleading. All school districts in Colorado are facing severe budget cuts. While it is true we are hiring fewer teachers than in previous years, the savings from the pension debt transaction has allowed us to actually hire teachers while most of our neighboring districts are laying teachers off and instituting furlough days.

18. And finally, the article quotes Jeannie Kaplan. It does not attribute the fact that she is a leading fundraiser for Andrew Romanoff, Michael Bennet’s opponent in the primary, and falsely claims that she raised issues about the pension debt in advance of the primary race. Article offers no substantiation that Ms. Kaplan raised this issue in advance of the primary race since no such substantiation exists. The article does not mention that a second board member, Andrea Merida, who has questioned the transaction is a paid staffer for Mr. Romanoff’s campaign.

The fact remains that this transaction has positioned DPS, its employees, and most of all its students to be better off in the long run than they would have been if we had not taken action. I was proud to be a part of the decision then, stand by it now, and am grateful for the leadership and vision of Michael Bennet, Tom Boasberg, and my fellow board colleagues who are focused on one thing-the most important thing-turning DPS around so that all resources, time, and attention serves to drive increases in student achievement, graduation rates, and college success.

Sincerely,

Jill Conrad

DPS Board Member, 2005-2009

Comments

18 thoughts on “The Truth of the Matter

  1. Colorado Pols included this as a link at the beginning of the article and said there was no reason to put up another diary.

    That said, I suppose it gives another opportunity to ask ask this question: why are these the exact same talking points Bennet spokesmodel Trevor Kincaid is sending out?

    Is Jill speaking on behalf of the campaign?  Are you?

    1. saying that it was what the Bennet campaign thought — and she agreed.  So apparently she was just lying when she said this was “her take” on the matter — it is the Bennet campaign’s talking points passed off as hers.

  2. The answer to other people’s free speech is to counter it with some free speech of your own, even if the other side doesn’t want you to.

  3. I think Jill’s comments are worth reading in a freestanding diary like this.  I won’t front page it because Pols already linked right to it on their own front page piece.  But as I said, it deserves a spot of its own in the diary list.

  4. Do the majority agree with Jill or do they agree with Jeanne (the Romanoff supporter).  It’s hard to believe Morgensen didn’t check out Jeanne Kaplan and her relationship to the Romanoff campaign.  That plus at least 20 other holes in the story.

    1. is a serious oversight. There seem to be quite a few who think that because the author has a Pulitzer her work can not be questioned.

      I would advise those folks (everyone really) to research the Pulitzer Prize process. You don’t get awarded the Prize for being a perfect writer. You don’t get the Prize for your body of work. You are awarded it for a single piece of work on a single subject for specific categories. It is work that you submit (with a submission fee) to be considered.

      It is a great honor to win a Pulitzer but it in no way make you or your future work unassailable.

    2. Bennet cannot be elected after this revelation. It’s very damaging and something the Republicans will be all over in the general.

      He’s tarnished baggage now with absolutely no chance of being elected.  

      1. after his nasty, totally negative, no issues campaign.  He’s damaged goods.  His lack of integrity has been amazing. The end does not justify the means.  

    3. What about DPS board as a whole?

      ok, so 3 out of 7 of the school board members want an investigation, just like 4 out of 9 of the Supreme Court Justices disagreed with Citizens United and Bush vs. Gore.

      It helps when the School Board President, Theresa Pena, is the treasurer for the Bennet campaign, then you can end debates through procedural motions.

      nice.

      too bad the New York Times, CNN, the Washington Post, and others are on to this story now.

      1. slinging and connection to board members (one who was payed by his campaign and another who is a big contributor).  Romanoff doesn’t come away from this with any integrity.

        1. so much mud…

          or is it so much resistance by the president of the Board, campaign treasurer for Bennet, Theresa Bennet, and fellow investor and current Superintendent Boasberg?

          Bennet’s a millionaire.

          He passed off his job as superintendent to his lifelong friend Tom Boasberg.

          But while he was in charge of DPS he invested and lost 25 million and counting of Denver Teacher’s retirement funds and that was merged with the state PERA funds.

          denverco – are you over 250,000 a year?

          because the people who usually attack PERA and the Teacher’s retirement funds are people like Mike Rosen.

          campaigns aside, can’t you see what’s happening here?

          1. are willing to leave out many facts. Kaplan never mentions to the times that she is a supporter and big time contributor to Romanoff. It never mentions his paid board member Merida. Plus the conclusion that the article makes is that the economic collapse is what created the current financial situation for the DPS.

            You don’t mention that the DPS is currently hiring teachers. How many other school districts are doing that in this economic climate? And I didn’t attack Pera or the Teacher’s retirement fund. I worked for the state for a number of years and don’t appreciate the way you continuously jump to conclusions that aren’t there.

            And yeah campaigns aside, I see very clearly what is happening here. Others are connecting the dots and the mud is landing on Romanoff.

            The nightly news seems to be reporting this much differently than you and I noticed that your article in Huffington Post isn’t getting the favorable replies you had hoped for.

            Why has Romanoff never chose to run on his record instead chosing to attack, attack, attack. Makes you wonder.  

  5. Whose job does not allow him to comment publicly (I copied it verbatim):

    “This (Morgensen article) is unbelievable.  She never thoroughly researched the details of the deal to secure DPS debt.  She just made assumptions about the deals that were done.  One of the assumptions is comparing the DPS deal to a variable rate homeowner mortgage.  She also made assumptions on termination fees.  She should have known all of this being a financial reporter.  Any individual who works with these fixed income investments and derivatives would know that the Morgensen article contained significant inaccuracies.”

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

74 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!