CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

50%↑

15%

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 15, 2019 05:27 PM UTC

10/15/19 Democratic Prez Debate Open Thread

  • 31 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Shake hands and come out swinging left.

Comments

31 thoughts on “10/15/19 Democratic Prez Debate Open Thread

  1. Thank you, Andrew Yang….

    I still think your $1,000 per month gift to everyone is an idiotic idea but…..

    You pointed out that four other countries have tried the wealth tax and all four repealed it because it was unworkable.

  2. Warren’s wealth tax raising hundreds of billions of dollars? Let me expose a CPA secret. Whenever Congress says they’re going to simplify taxes we CPAs get to buy new cars.  Helping clients avoid a wealth tax will send yacht sales through the roof.

    1. Her wealth tax plan has a provision called an exit tax which will require anyone trying to move their wealth off shore to pay 40% to leave the country.

        1. "I can't imagine any way around that….."

          Follow Mitt Romney's lead and move much of your stuff offshore.

          If her wealth tax were ever to get traction, it would have to go into effect immediately so people wouldn't start moving their assets before it went into effect.

           

          1. You own a factory worth $1 billion.  You sell it to me for $100 million.  I sell you my $1 billion factory for $100 million.  On paper, neither of us is a billionaire now and we dodge th e tax.  Yes, in real life we have a mor e complex shuffle.   But that's the basic idea.

    2. Candidates who go left are exciting in the primary season, but lose in the general.
      Most of most of her plans would not get through the Senate, even if they could get through the House. And the deficit will be so GINORMOUS that it's going to be scarey passing anything that isn't net positive immediately.

      Senator Sherrod Brown said today that Medicare for all  will mean a Trump second term.

      He's the last D to win state wide in Ohio – and he's right.
      Sanders, Warren, Yang, Gababrd = Trump gets reelected. (PS – any of them could say restore the draft, or a plan of national service and everyone who serves gets TRICARE for Life  but like Everify – they don't know how)

       

       

       

       

  3. I'm not able to watch live, but I assume the issue of M4A has come up.  I understand the angst of how its being talked about (pitting the haves vs. have nots).  That said, whatever the next generation product might look like, let's stop calling it insurance.  Insurance, by nature, is an exclusionary product although it includes the good risks the insurance companies want and excludes bad risks they do not want. 

    Because of its exclusionary nature health care is not, never has been, never will be, a good candidate as an insurance product because everyone needs health care.  Everyone.  Without exception.  

    So let's don't frame this as socialism or capitalism…or anything in between. We need universal health care – because health care is universally needed – unlike what is provided by "insurance". 

      1. MFA still has majority support, though. 

        Keep in mind that when you debate wording of plans and tax rates,  and which ones are politically most expedient, what you’re really talking about is how many Americans will die from preventable diseases and from lack of basic health care, which every other industrialized country in the world provides for its citizens. 

        1. I am aware of the real death panel.

          I am not saying universal access and coverage is a bad thing.

          The point is
          A electoral math : most Trump voters are gonna vote for him again
          B You tell some beaten down underemployed, serially employed vet in western PA the family and community can stop worrying about medical insurance and she's not paying for it, if  she believes you she may realize two things: as a vet she already doesn't pay for gov't medical insurance , and taxing the rich doesn't work – they play us and eventually the middle and bottom pay.

          I could paint a thousand pictures – most people with insurance they think they like feel like access and affordability are good goals, but not if it means they lose

          1. The majority of Gardner’s ilk would tell you they love the provisions of the ACA, they just hate Obamacare. 

            I’m generally in the Klobuchar camp on this one: get the public option in place and go from there. Wholesale change is unlikely with the cards we’re dealt in the Senate. Put a singular focus on two words – public option – and I think it’s a winner.

             

      2. I'm speaking as me, a voter.  I agree the M4A moniker has a stain.  We lose a lot in translation as we come from our own biases – but whether it's Michael Bennet's MedicareX, a public option, a blend, I want outcomes – and couldn't give two schitts what it's called (although the sloped-forehead crowd will use any means to roll back any advances we've made). 

      3. They have to,  they better,  call in Medicare Something or Something . . .

        . . . because if they don’t, the ttumpublicans and Gardners are gonna’ tell 44-million old people who actually do vote that you Democrats are going to “take away” ”their” Medicare . . . 
         

        . . . you really wanna’ lose in 2020 by 40 million some highly pissed off, angry, wrinkly, plenty-of-time-to votes??

        1. It is important to remember how quickly a candidate can pivot from support to non -support. 

          It has been the pounding of the drum for M4A that has strengthened the public option support. As soon as M4A weakens further in the polls, as is likely, the forces of corporate domination will come after the option with similar determination….but it is too late.

          I believe we will see a Medicare Public Option. Sooner rather than later. Give Americans a fair deal and they will take it. The insurance industry is run by "granny hosers" who love their ginormous profits…they won't go down without a fight.

           

  4. There are no substantial differences in policy among the candidates. Especially when you know their wet dreams have to make it thru Congress.

    This is a wasted 2-hour show.

    The differences among them are:

    • Age
    • Personality
    • And, who is best suited to beating The Dumpster®️
    1. Harris wants Trump's Twitter account to be removed?  That's as smart as believing jailed felons should have the right to vote.  No wonder her polls are cratering.

    2. Well, Tulsi is different in policy. Foreign policy, anyway. and that is an area which Presidents actually can make a pretty clear, unobstructed choice on.

      There also seems to be some differences among the candidates in foreign trade policy. 

      None of the proposals for M4A/expand ACA/etc. would make it through Congress without substantial changes.  Green New Deal also seems pretty far-fetched to me absent some event(s) to trigger a tidal wave of partisan shift.

      Wish there was more discussion of reversing Executive actions, having a better approach to nominations of Exec staff, and talking about how to make the courts more representative in a system with life-time appointments.

  5. NYT Debate Highlights

    Ooh, Pear…your crush Tulsi Gabbard agrees with Yang on Universal Basic Income.

    Kamala Harris reminding everyone that reproductive rights are under full on attack. 

    Everyone trying to come at Warren, hypocritically attacking her on Medicare for All, and on restoring Clinton-era tax rates that led to a budget surplus.

    Sad to see the circular firing squad in action.

     

     

     

    1. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/16/opinion/presidential-debate-ohio.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage

      Who wants to be the one who gets to break the news to Uncle Joe that he has stayed too long at the party and it's time for him to go home…..

      And that chat should happen sooner rather than later. As it stands now, there will probably be a three-way virtual tie in Iowa, Biden gets his ass kicked by Warren in NH, Biden kicks everyone else's ass in SC, and Nevada ends up as a virtual tie.

      My guess:  as long as African-American voters stay with him, Biden stays in the race.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

46 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!