Please Stop Coddling Dangerous Anti-Vaxxer Ignorance

Gov. Jared Polis (D).

The New York Times supplies the context for today’s bit of tough love:

The measles outbreak continues to spread in the United States, surpassing 700 cases this year, federal health officials said on Monday. The virus has now been found in 22 states.

More than 500 of the 704 cases recorded as of last Friday were in people who had not been vaccinated, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported. Sixty-six people have been hospitalized.

About 400 of the cases have been found in New York City and its suburbs, mostly in Orthodox Jewish communities. That outbreak has spread to Detroit.

Los Angeles is now experiencing a fast-growing outbreak, and hundreds of university students who are thought to have been exposed and cannot prove that they have had their shots have been asked to quarantine themselves at home.

In 2000, the Centers for Disease Control declared the once-pandemic childhood disease measles to be entirely eradicated in the United States, after decades of consistent vaccination of the population in childhood steadily reduced outbreaks of the disease to nil. Unfortunately, since that moment of public health success a wave of misinformation about common childhood vaccines and in particular a now-discredited claim that vaccines are responsible for the rise in diagnosed cases of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has eroded the rate of childhood vaccinations enough for outbreaks to resume, steadily increasing in severity to the crisis presently underway.

In Colorado, where our rate of kindergarten vaccination is an embarrassing dead last in the nation, this renewed outbreak is taking place at the same time as a debate over legislation to tighten the state’s extremely permissive regulations for childhood vaccinations. Today, parents can claim a “personal belief” exemption from vaccinating their children with no restrictions on those children attending public school. The bill being debated today would not eliminate that exemption, but would require parents to take the additional step of filing in person at a state health department office to receive it.

And as the Denver Post’s Anna Staver reports, that’s where Gov. Jared Polis draws the line–and it’s creating significant blue-on-blue controversy in this fraught final week of the legislative session:

The Colorado Hospital Association and other health care experts across Colorado also responded strongly Friday to comments from the governor — first reported by Colorado Public Radio — that he didn’t support the current bill, House Bill 1312, to make some vaccination exemptions more difficult for parents to get.

“On behalf of Children’s Hospital Colorado, I was disappointed to see the governor’s comments this morning,” said Jessica Cataldi, a pediatrician who specializes in infectious diseases. “The multiple measles outbreaks across the country represent a public health crisis that must be addressed. I hope the governor will reconsider his position.”

[Rep. Kyle] Mullica’s bill would require parents to visit a state health department office and fill out a form in person the first time they request a personal or religious vaccine exemption for a child entering public school. Currently they need only provide written notice to the school district upon registration.

Early this year, Gov. Polis scuttled much stronger legislation also sponsored by Rep. Kyle Mullica that would have eliminated the personal exemption entirely. House Bill 19-1312, the current bill to make it moderately more difficult but not impossible to claim that exemption, was criticized by Polis Friday over requiring parents seeking a personal belief exemption from vaccinating their kids to apply in person with the state health department.

Like we said in February, no one can accuse Gov. Polis of being a so-called “anti-vaxxer,” meaning someone who actually believes these discredited theories about vaccine safety. Polis has had his own children vaccinated and makes clear that everyone needs to do so. There’s a world of difference between Polis’ concern about not being overly punitive in government’s approach to this public health problem versus Republicans in the state legislature who have openly supported anti-vaccine pseudoscience in their opposition to the bill. We believe that Polis means well in trying to strike a balance.

Unfortunately, the timing of this intransigence could not be worse–and after already lowering the expectations of what is signable legislation even in the midst of a nationwide measles outbreak, Polis risks energizing the side of the vaccine debate he claims and we believe he doesn’t side with. The resurgence of preventable disease attributable to ignorance and misinformation–no matter how well intentioned or sacred–is a greater threat than the inconvenience of applying in person for an exemption.

The 11% of Coloradans who don’t vaccinate their kids make more noise than the 89% who do.

But politically, siding with the 89% should be an easy choice.

166 Shares

7 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. PseudonymousPseudonymous says:

    Like we said in February, no one can accuse Gov. Polis of being a so-called “anti-vaxxer,” meaning someone who actually believes these discredited theories about vaccine safety […] There’s a world of difference between Polis’ concern about not being overly punitive in government’s approach to this public health problem versus Republicans in the state legislature who have openly supported anti-vaccine pseudoscience in their opposition to the bill,

    There is no functional difference between refusing to vaccinate and enabling the refusal to vaccinate.  Both of these give us unvaccinated humans, who provide populations through which preventable (and terrible) diseases will spread.

    Polis isn't better than anti-vaxxers because he "knows the truth."  He's worse, because he knows the truth and will still refuse to protect the people of Colorado.  He's a slave to a libertarian ideology that puts the young, the old, and the infirm at risk of death.  He would rather have people be free than have a state free of these diseases.  Please stop dressing this up as anything other than blind loyalty to ridiculous beliefs– whether that's opposition to vaccination or a concept of freedom that would see people suffer and die when it's easily preventable.

    • DavieDavie says:

      Jared needs to remember the old Libertarian saying "Your right to swing your arm ends at the tip of my nose". 

      If by calling for a one time inconvenience (initial in-person submission of an exemption form) we can prevent disease and potential death for thousands of infants, the elderly, or those with compromised immune systems, then I think that this law fully adheres to the principle stated above.

      • Diogenesdemar says:

        Don’t want your kids to be vaccinated?.

        Great, it’s a free country . . . 

        . . . feel free to keep all your little disease-vector fuckers inside at home and don’t ever let them out anywhere in public!

  2. gertie97 says:

    The guv is wrong on this one. Let's hope he gets a grip.

  3. While I laud the attempt to reduce anti-vaccine exemptions, I think that making it harder to register them by limiting where exemptions can be filed is a petty method not unlike reducing the number of abortion clinics or removing polling stations from minority communities.

    Let them register by mail or online for all I care. But their child's exemption certificate – required for public school enrollment in lieu of a vaccination – will be sent by mail yearly, and the State will use that address to warn of the things the child could be excluded from in during an outbreak, the facts surrounding disease effects, the gap in protection that will remain for a period after vaccination, and anything else the State can do to convince them to vaccinate. Also, mandatory surveys on anti-vaxx beliefs to try and address concerns and falsities.

    • PseudonymousPseudonymous says:

      Education won't fix the uneducable.

      This bill isn't great.  It's trying to chip away at the problem by making it harder to opt out.  I think that's better than your solution, but it isn't nearly enough.  What was pretty good was the original bill, which, of course, was watered down to what it is today after a threatened veto by Governor Polio.

  4. Diogenesdemar says:

    Seriously, Guv, what’s it gonna’ take? . . . 

    . . . How many needless deaths?

    . . . How many hospitalizations?

    . . . A pandemic?

    . . . An outbreak so large that nobody who can’t prove having had a vaccination can’t be out in public?  (I know I was vaccinated, but try finding your childhood shot record lately?)

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.