President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump



CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*


CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*


CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks




CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) J. Sonnenberg (R) Lauren Boebert (R) Ted Harvey

15% 10%↓ 10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Doug Bruce

(R) Bob Gardner




CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*


CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen



CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi




State Senate Majority See Full Big Line





State House Majority See Full Big Line





Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 21, 2019 12:03 PM UTC

White Republicans Appropriate MLK Day

  • by: Colorado Pols

UPDATE: The Greeley Tribune’s Tyler Silvy:

A Colorado representative said black people and white people were lynched in nearly equal numbers for being Republican in the post-Reconstruction era.

Rep. Lori Saine, R-Firestone, made the claim on the Colorado House floor Friday, and posted the video to her Facebook page Monday, saying it was in defense of House District 49 Rep. Perry Buck, R-Windsor, who tried to introduce a resolution honoring King…

Herod said Buck was added as the first co-sponsor of the resolution, and she said Buck spoke very eloquently.

“She handled it very well,” Herod said. “Unfortunately, I can’t say the same for Lori Saine.” [Pols emphasis]


Via Jeff Mason, White House correspondent for Reuters (and a Colorado native).

Today is Martin Luther King Jr. Day, a federal holiday first observed in 1986 to honor and remember one of America’s most important civil rights leaders. Naturally, white Republican elected officials in both Washington D.C. and Colorado have been using the occasion to appropriate Dr. King’s message for their own political needs.

President Trump made a brief visit to the MLK Memorial in Washington D.C. today. As the Huffington Post reports, Trump didn’t bother to speak the words “Martin,” “Luther,” or “King” in his very brief trip:

The president did not mention the civil rights icon during the visit, which ended about two minutes after he arrived.

“Good morning, everybody,” Trump told reporters after laying a wreath in front of the monument. “It’s a great day. It’s a beautiful day. And thank you for being here. Appreciate it.”

Vice President Mike Pence tagged along for the surprise trip. Neither Trump nor Pence had public events listed on their schedules for Monday, the second Martin Luther King Jr. Day observed since Trump took office in January 2017.

Trump faced scrutiny last year when he did not attend a public event on Martin Luther King Jr. Day. Instead, he visited one of his golf clubs in Florida.

[mantra-pullquote align=”right” textalign=”left|center|right” width=”50%”]“Martin Luther King Jr. was a bridge builder, not a wall builder.”

  — Martin Luther King III (1/21/19)[/mantra-pullquote]

Vice President Mike Pence joined Trump for today’s visit, which came one day after Pence was roundly criticized for comparing Dr. King to our 45th President. From NBC News:

Appearing on CBS’ “Face the Nation” on Sunday — a day before the federal holiday honoring King — Pence quoted a passage from King’s “I Have a Dream” speech at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on Aug. 28, 1963: “One of my favorite quotes from Dr. King was ‘Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy.'”

Speaking of King, the vice president went on: “You think of how he changed America. He inspired us to change through the legislative process, to become a more perfect union.

“That’s exactly what President Trump is calling on Congress to do — come to the table in the spirit of good faith,” Pence said. [Pols emphasis] “We’ll secure our border. We’ll reopen the government, and we’ll move our nation forward, as the president said yesterday, to even a broader discussion about immigration reform in the months ahead.”

Of course, we don’t have to wonder about what King might have thought about a border wall. In 1964, King delivered a speech in East Berlin, Germany about the immorality of a wall built to divide people.

Dr. King’s son, Martin Luther King III, was not at all amused by Pence’s comments. As Julian Zeilizer writes for CNN, Pence’s comments aren’t just inappropriate — they are completely innacurate: “The comments made by Pence — who works at the top of an administration that promotes policies that directly contradict King’s message — fly directly in the face of Martin Luther King’s legacy.”

State Rep. Lori Saine and State Sen. Vicki Marble, Republicans representing Weld County.

But it’s not just America’s highest-ranking white dudes who are using Dr. King’s legacy as a crutch for their own nonsensical narratives. On Friday, State Rep. Lori Saine (R-Firestone) delivered a bizarre speech on the House Floor in support of a resolution honoring Dr. King. Here are the first words that came out of Saine’s mouth:

Colleagues, we are standing in the moral arc of history today as we celebrate a reverend who changed history for all Americans. We have come a long way on that arc since the reconstruction, when whites and blacks alike were in nearly equal numbers lynched for the crime of being Republican. [Pols emphasis]

Come again?

Saine’s “equal numbers” comments are more than a little off. Yes, some white people were lynched at the end of Reconstruction. Some of these white people were probably Republicans. But that’s about as far as you can go in Saine’s defense. In April 2018, The Guardian newspaper examined America’s history of lynching, which doesn’t square with anything Saine said on Friday:

For decades, the most comprehensive total belonged to the archives at the Tuskegee Institute, which tabulated 4,743 people who died at the hands of US lynch mobs between 1881 and 1968. According to the Tuskegee numbers, 3,446 (nearly three-quarters) of those lynched were black Americans.

The EJI, which relied on the Tuskegee numbers in building its own count, integrated other sources, such as newspaper archives and other historical records, to arrive at a total of 4,084 racial terror lynchings in 12 southern states between the end of Reconstruction in 1877 and 1950, and another 300 in other states…

Saine went further in her comments, using the opportunity of HJR19-1006 to highlight the plight of the Republican minority in the state legislature, or something:

Therefore, colleagues…how could I honor Martin Luther King today without shining a light on injustice myself? My colleagues – how can you redeem your marginalized voice by marginalizing ours? Our march towards justice is not over when a colleague is barred from introducing a resolution on this floor because of the color of her skin. Our march of justice is not over when a member of this body who represents Americans of races, creeds and religions is told that Martin Luther King does not represent her heritage.

This is the very same Rep. Lori Saine who once brought a box of fried chicken to a committee hearing as a “silent protest” after State Sen. Vicki Marble was criticized for using the occasion of a different committee hearing on poverty to explain that black people were in poor health because they ate too much fried chicken.

As Dr. King once said, “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”

May it also bend toward things like truth and facts.


4 thoughts on “White Republicans Appropriate MLK Day

  1. Number of whites lynched during reconstruction for the crime of being Republican = ~ 0.

    Number of blacks lynched during reconstruction for the crime of being Republican = ~ 0.

    Meh. Even Saine finds an acorn every now and then . . . 

  2. This is an idiotic attempt to claim current goodness because political ancestors did good things. Apparently they think that being good is a sort of inherited wealth passed down instead of something that people need to do in their own lives.

    It also seems to assume that this all happened very far away by and to people who have nothing to do with our state. About two years ago I read a grim book, Lynching in Colorado, 1859-1919 by Stephen J. Leonard. In it the author points out that proportionally the 175 people killed by mobs in our state represent a higher proportion than were killed in South Carolina in the same period.

    Yes, quite a few of these lynchings were of the type shown in movies in an almost romantic way. "Hang that them there horse thief." However, at least five of them were explicitly racially motivated and the proportion of the lynchings where the race of the victim is known shows a tendency towards picking more non-white victims than a random sampling of the population would.

    The bottom line is that the history of racial conflict is not simple or confined to the south. This is something that all Americans should work to make better.

    1. In the account of racial killings by extra-judicial white mobs, we should recall not all victims were black.  There's an exhaustive project to develop accounts of the killings, and that extensive data base was then used to develop an interactive map.  You can find a  project called Monroe Work Today covered by CityLab.

      There are a number of individual cases in Colorado and in New Mexico, my birthplace. Among the largest episodes, two nearby:  the killings of 28 Chinese railroad workers at Rock Springs, WY and the Tulsa riots of 1921.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments

Posts about

Donald Trump

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo

Posts about

Colorado House

Posts about

Colorado Senate

43 readers online now


Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!