Grady Nouis. Gotta Go.

Today the Denver Post published the results of background checks run by that paper on most (but not all) Colorado legislative candidates running in 2018. As Jackson Barnett reports, some candidates chose not to cooperate:

Some candidates declined to provide their full birthdates, which are required to run checks through the Colorado Bureau of Investigation: Susan Kochevar, Susan Lontine, Vicki Pyne, Jay Frank Kucera and James D. “Jim” Wilson.

These state House and Senate candidates did not respond to efforts to reach them by phone, email and social media: Kent Edward Jarnig, Kim Bishop, Terri Carver, Monica Duran, Mike Donald, Liz Rosenbaum, Mike Weissman, Tim Geitner, Alysia Padilla, Alex Valdez, Kevin Van Winkle, Donald E. Valdez, Joan Poston, Kevin R. Smith and Lori A. Saine.

Of those who cooperated, the vast majority of candidates do not have criminal records in Colorado, according to Post research.

Among the candidates who provided the Denver Post with their birthdate in order to run a Colorado Bureau of Investigations background check, there are a number of fairly mundane items, including many quickly-dismissed charges that nonetheless appear on their permanent record. Several candidates have arrests and deferred judgements for driving under the influence, which experience has shown is not in itself a disqualifying offense to serve in the Colorado legislature. Overall, the criminal records detailed by the Post don’t seem nearly as serious as back in 2010, when a similar investigation found both many more and more severe offenses in the records of a large number of candidates.

That is, until we get to the case of Grady Nouis, the Republican nominee in Arvada’s HD-29. Erik Maulbetsch of the Colorado Times Recorder has covered Nouis’ criminal and alt-right background in some detail in this space, and the Post’s summary of both can best be described as career-ending:

Nouis also has been in the orbit of groups and events associated with far-right views. In a Facebook live video he recorded while at an anti-Shariah law protest earlier this year, Nouis repeatedly used a racial slur during a confrontation with African-American counter-protesters.

While the audio can’t be understood at the beginning of the argument, Nouis, who is white, then complains about an African-American woman: “She called me a n***** and said I can’t say it back.”

He repeated the word several more times, the video shows…

Nouis’ past convictions for running a drug house to distribute marijuana and “magic mushrooms” might be politically survivable, perhaps even a campaign point in the right environment–probably not as a Republican House candidate in a swing district, but somewhere. What sinks Nouis of course is the racism, which we already knew about from the Times-Recorder’s stories and knew would appear in mass media inevitably. In the event Grady were to win his seat, which was never likely against beloved incumbent Rep. Tracy Kraft Tharp, Republicans would be under intense pressure to push him out a la Rep. Jim Welker back in 2006.

The caveat bring this isn’t 2006–and there may not be the moral resolve in today’s GOP to do the right thing.

Whatever the Colorado GOP itself does, we do think there will be calls, perhaps bipartisan calls, for Nouis to pull out of the race following this damning report–in which his is clearly the worst of all the unsavory stories dug up by the Post’s background checks. If Nouis won’t do what’s both right and politically expedient for his fellow Republicans, voters will render the question moot in two weeks’ time.

Likely with collateral damage (see photo top).

12 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. davebarnes says:

    The Post can't find out people's birthdates?
    That reeks of either incompetence or being really cheap.

  2. Moderatus says:

    Something is weird about this story. They say it's about background checks, but none of the allegations against Nouis related to "racism" come from the CBI, only from the liberal propaganda site Colorado Times Recorder which actually published here proving how biased they are.

    Is the Post trying to mislead their readers? It sure looks like it…….

    • unnamed says:

      Oh you mean like making a commercial about your opponent being a "Socialist" based on a magazine subscription is misleading?  Nouis said the N-word several times.  So, it's fair game to call it racist.

      • Moderatus says:

        The story says it's about background checks, but none of that information came from a background check. How is that not misleading?

        • JohnInDenver says:

          The background checks came up with both the criminal background ("past convictions for running a drug house to distribute marijuana and “magic mushrooms”) and the non-criminal links to social media.

          Why is that a difficult concept? Background checks run on me for employment come up with my "criminal" past of a couple of speeding tickets and a range social media. One employer found "a year" discrepancy between when I said I left a job and when the background check said I did (I quit in December, starting a Christmas vacation early — the 'official' source said I quit in January). I'm certain with the right sort of background check, we can find out other incriminating data, like I don't floss frequently.

    • Davie says:

      Ah hah!  Our resident jeanyous exposed the little-known fact that being a fucking racist isn't against the law!  Lucky for Nutter, right?

    • MichaelBowman says:

      I'm going to channel unnamed here… 

      …only from the conservative propaganda site Washington Free Beacon which actually published here proving how biased they are.

      Is the Beacon trying to mislead their readers? It sure looks like it…….

      There. Fixed it for you Moddy. 

    • Genghis says:

      Something is weird about this story.

      Yes, the something being Grady Nouis.

      They say it's about background checks,

      No, they don't.

      but none of the allegations against Nouis related to "racism" come from the CBI,


      It's clear that attending racist rallies and yelling "nigger" at black people fully reflects your values, but do you believe such behavior reflects the values of the people in HD-29 as a whole?

  3. JohnInDenver says:

    Anyone want to do a partisan breakdown of those who "did not respond to efforts to reach them by phone, email and social media" ?  No response to multiple inquiries is, to me, more troubling than turning up past arrests. 

    My Mom taught me to answer mail and phone calls — even if it was a polite "no, thank you for asking."

  4. Arvadonian1 says:

    It is interesting that Vicki Pyne, who was placed on the ballot by party insiders to replace Lang Sias in HD 27 refused to respond to the Posts' candidate profile and now has refused to submit to a simple background check that virtually every employer requires prior to hire.  She seems to be a stealth candidate…with a shitload of yard signs……

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account

You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.