CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

50%↑

15%

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 08, 2009 04:23 AM UTC

Colorado Constitutional Convention Nuts and Bolts

  • 4 Comments
  • by: Gorky Pulviczek

For quite some time, I’ve been advocating for a constitutional convention here and elsewhere.  It’s a somewhat involved process, so I decided to document it here for those who are curious.

Summary – although it will likely take a few years, a constitutional convention could greatly benefit all of Colorado.  And, as I said in 2005 (around the Ref C time frame) – if we don’t do it now, in 5 years we’ll wish we had.

The Colorado Constitution contains all of the details of how a Convention should be called.  These are the steps in a nutshell:

1. The State Legislature (both House and Senate) approve by 2/3 majority a referendum calling for a convention.

2. At the next general election, the public votes on the referendum

3. If passed, the next session of the Legislature calls the convention.

4. Convention delegates are elected

5. The Convention, umm, convenes

6. A new Constitution is proposed and ratified

The convention delegation is composed of 2 individuals elected from each state Senate district on the timetable set by the Legislature.  It convenes within 3 months of the delegate election.

There is no deadline set for how long the convention may take.  However, once the convention is complete, ratification of the proposed new constitution must take place between 2-6 months after the close of the convention.

Ratification of the proposed constitution is by simple majority vote of Colorado voters.

So, practically, what does it mean?  How long would it take for us to get a new constitution?

If the Legislature at the next session approves a referendum, this is one possible timeline:

Nov 2010: General election – shall there be a convention?

Spring 2011: Legislature sets election date, other rules for convention

Nov 2011: Delegate election

Jan 2012: Convention called

Jun 2012: (estimate) Convention complete

Nov 2012: Ratification of Constitution

So, 3 years from now, essentially.  A long time.  But only longer the longer we wait…  I plan on lobbying my Senator and Representative heavily.  I hope many people will join me.

Should Colorado call a Constitutional Convention?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Comments

4 thoughts on “Colorado Constitutional Convention Nuts and Bolts

    1. I like smoke-filled rooms 🙂

      My personal preference for what should happen at the Convention would first be a vote to start with the original 1876 Constitution, and tweak from there (I would suggest making sure any obsolete sections are deleted, and then work on reforming the amendment process).

      1. Major concepts that have been added to the Constituion could finally have some kind of informed review before they are added or not added.

        Under the current initiative process, there is no committee hearing or anything like it before the issue is put to a vote. The Office of Legislative Legal Services does provide the proponents with a list of questions designed to clarify the amendnment and also point out potential constitutionality issues, but those comments are just that and cannot force a change to the amendment. Therfore, they are often overlooked.

        If this were to come to pass, I would seriously consider running for Convention Delegate.

        1. Considering the politically contentious nature of the issues that would be addressed in any convention, it would be every politician/politico/pundit/legal scholar and their mother trying to get in their two cents.

          It’s the very reason that I doubt such a thing would ever come to pass. I do agree, however, that in a perfect world, this would be an ideal way to fix some of the problems facing our state right now.

          But to paraphrase Madison, there are a lot fewer angels than demons right now, and I’d rather not have Jon Caldera writing the new constitution.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

41 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!