U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Michael Bennet
(D) Phil Weiser
60%↑
50%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Jena Griswold
60%↑
40%↑
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez
(D) J. Danielson
(R) Sheri Davis
50%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(D) Jeff Bridges
(R) Kevin Grantham
40%
40%
30%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Manny Rutinel
(D) Yadira Caraveo
45%↓
40%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
October 28, 2009 08:17 AM UTC
12 Comments
I wish our McDonalds out here had the McChicken. But they only give it to us in the hot and spicy variety.
So maybe McInnis has my vote after all.
If so, he’s got my vote.
It’s Iowa all over again.
Hillary debated every Democratic presidential candidate including Dennis Kucinich, in many open forums and debates leading up the caucuses and primaries.
It might be a good talking point that will resonate with Republican voters (McInnis = Hillary [I’m sure “any candidate = Hillary is an effective attack]) but it’s not based in reality.
I think the point of the previous comment was to note that McInnis’s overconfidence and dismisive approach could also have a downside. Hence the Hilary analogy.
It’s a terrible analogy no matter how you cut it.
Except, like Hillary, he is not the incumbent and being the incumbent is not a positive.
You may not like the analogy, but it is not terrible.
I realize that it plays well in a Republican primary, but I’m sure you could find a more apt simile.
Presidential primary debates get national press and widespread attention. Nobody cares if a couple of candidates running in a statewide race will debate or not – especially when the primary is 10 months away.
the anaology is debatable but you have to give the video props for being funny. Thats the first thing I have seen on pols in a long time that actually made for a good lighthearted laugh.
but it seems a little wasted and obvious.