The Fort Collins Coloradoan’s Jace Marmaduke reports on the latest head-scratcher from the Trump administration–a proposal from embattled EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt to roll back Obama-era fuel economy standards:
The average Colorado household could miss out on up to $2,700 in gas savings by 2030 after a planned rollback of Environmental Protection Agency fuel economy standards, according to a Union of Concerned Scientists analysis.
Union of Concerned Scientists calculated a household’s potential savings if the standards were kept in place, even factoring in a potential increase in vehicle prices due to manufacturers updating models to meet the current federal standards.
EPA chief Scott Pruitt announced this week that he plans to relax the standards, which currently include an average fuel efficiency target of 54.5 mpg by 2025.
“The Obama administration’s determination was wrong,” Pruitt said in a press release. “Obama’s EPA cut the midterm evaluation process short with politically charged expediency, made assumptions about the standards that didn’t comport with reality and set the standards too high.”
ThinkProgress explains the backstory:
In 2012, the Obama administration approved new auto emissions standards, with 2018 model year vehicles required to average 38.3 miles per gallon of gasoline and 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025. The 2025 target was set as part of a compromise reached between the Obama administration and the auto industry.
Environmental and energy efficiency groups accused Pruitt of siding with the fossil fuel industry by seeking to weaken the fuel efficiency standards…
“There’s no good reason for these standards to be sabotaged,” Evans said. The Alliance to Save Energy is a bipartisan alliance of business, government, environmental, and consumer groups that works to expand the economy while reducing energy consumption.
ThinkProgress reports that although the auto industry was good with these higher mileage standards when they were hashed out with the Obama administration, they’re just as happy with seeing them relaxed! As long as people keep buying cars, which we’re pretty sure under just about any foreseeable circumstance they will. After all, automakers won’t have to spend the money to improve their cars now. And while the oil and gas industry might say they’re all about efficiency, we suspect they’ll be just fine without it too.
Who loses? Well, who always loses when the the current generation stops caring about the next one?
But it’s okay, because Scott Pruitt–and Donald Trump–will be long gone.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: harrydoby
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Who Will Win Colorado’s Tightest Congressional Races? (Poll #3)
BY: kwtree
IN: The Pro-Normal Party Coalition (feat. Adam Frisch)
BY: kwtree
IN: The Pro-Normal Party Coalition (feat. Adam Frisch)
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Who Will Win Colorado’s Tightest Congressional Races? (Poll #3)
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Who Will Win Colorado’s Tightest Congressional Races? (Poll #3)
BY: Dave P
IN: The Pro-Normal Party Coalition (feat. Adam Frisch)
BY: kwtree
IN: Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Our resident ISP nutlid loves this
This is sure gonna’ help that Stormy’s john’s trade-deficit thingy, huh? . . .
. . . doesn’t every consumer in China, plus even those in some “shithole” countries, want to park an Escalade that gets up to 14 mpgs in their driveways??!??
Unfortunately for Pruitt, California still has the authority to maintain their own standards, to which a phalanx of other states also adhere.
So the automakers can either abandon those markets, engineer and maintain a second set of California-compliant vehicles, or just plow ahead to meet the previously agreed to standards for all the states (probably the best profit to investment decision).