CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese



President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump



CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*


CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*


CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks




CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg




CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank



CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*


CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen



CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi




State Senate Majority See Full Big Line





State House Majority See Full Big Line





Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 22, 2018 10:34 AM UTC

Rubio Shows Courage on Guns That Coffman Couldn't

  • by: Colorado Pols

UPDATE: Democrat Jason Crow, Coffman’s likely General Election opponent, released this online ad today addressing the need for gun safety and Coffman’s wishy-washy approach to the issue:


The Hill reports from yesterday’s CNN town hall event in Florida on gun violence in the wake of last week’s school shooting at a high school in Parkland–at which GOP Sen. Marco Rubio made new statements about gun safety that could shift a debate that has been fractiously stalled in Washington for many years, and in Colorado since the dramatic 2013 recalls over gun control bills passed that year:

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) on Wednesday announced he supports a law that would raise the age requirement to purchase a rifle, and would consider a ban of large-capacity magazines…

“I absolutely believe that in this country, if you are 18 years of age you should not be able to buy a rifle. I will support a law that takes that right away,” Rubio said.

He added that he supports banning bump stocks and improving the country’s background check system, measures that have received support from the Trump administration and other lawmakers.

Later in the town hall, Rubio also announced he is rethinking his past support for large-capacity magazines.

“I’ll tell you why,” Rubio said. “Because while it may not prevent an attack, it may say lives in an attack.”

Of all the gun safety bills passed in Colorado in 2013 in response to the Aurora theater mass shooting, by far the most controversial in terms of stoking anger among gun enthusiasts is the ban on gun magazines with a capacity higher than 15 rounds. It was the so-called “mag ban” that gun rights supporters called a step too far, and helped fuel the short-lived fire that ended with the recall of two Democratic state senators.

Today, Sen. Rubio’s newfound willingness to at least consider a limit on magazine capacity, after so many mass shootings have proven how high-capacity magazines balloon the casualty count, shows how far the debate on guns has come since 2013. Rubio is of course notorious for flip-flopping on hot-button issues, and it remains hard to imagine that a magazine limit could pass in the current NRA-dominated Republican Congress. But there’s no question that the landscape of this debate is shifting. Rubio, who represents a state that has witnessed extreme carnage in mass shootings in 2016 in Orlando and again last week, could represent a break in one of the great logjams in American politics.

Contrast Rubio’s responsiveness to that of Colorado’s Rep. Mike Coffman, whose district includes the Century Theater in Aurora where in July of 2012 12 people were killed and dozens injured by a shooter utilizing a 100-round drum magazine, as AP reported yesterday from his very tough town hall Tuesday night:

Sharp questions about guns dominated the hourlong town hall. Coffman said he was willing to discuss “reasonable restrictions within the parameters of the Second Amendment,” a statement that drew fierce boos from the crowd…

He spent much of his time defending some of his previous votes, including for a bill last year to require states to accept concealed-carry permits from other, less-regulated states and another for a bill rolling back an Obama administration rule confiscating guns from people judged not competent enough to manage their Social Security benefits. Coffman contended it was a civil rights issue and noted the American Civil Liberties Union and disability rights groups supported the rollback, a statement that also drew hearty boos.

“I cannot understand how somebody who represented the district that has the Aurora theater in it can say this is a bad idea,” Alex Tillman, 48, who works in risk management, told Coffman.

Press this week for Rep. Coffman on guns, both before and since his town hall on Tuesday, has been very bad. We wrote before that event how Coffman’s response to last week’s shooting that we need to be “laser-focused on mental health,” in dissonant contrast to Coffman’s record of voting against wider access to and coverage for mental health, was totally inadequate.

Now, with other Republicans leapfrogging Coffman’s weakness on guns, he looks even worse.


16 thoughts on “Rubio Shows Courage on Guns That Coffman Couldn’t

  1. This isn't Florida. This is the West.  Congrats on filling another town hall with screaming liberals but Coffman will never lose his seat for defending the Second Amendment.

    1. I remember a bunch of screaming gun nuts mobing townhalls in 2013.  Because they care more about their sense pf entitlement to unfettered access to guns than they care about preventing carnage.  Do you care more about your guns than you care about the lives of children nutlid?


      Also how is marijuana more of a national security threat than AR-15s?

      1. IIRC, Moldy was greatly relieved when Con Man Cory threw in the towel on his judicial appointment holds. As he put it, Gardner did so "before something really bad happened."

        Like what, Nutlid? 17 high school kids bludgeoned to death by a big bong?

        What a fucked up sense of priorities Fluffy has.

          1. It is my constutional right to equate them if I want to under the first amendment.  Especially when asking questions meant to challenge.  Why is marijuana more of a threat than an AR-15?  Oh.  I equated them again.  But it is my constitutional right to do so.

  2. I support increased controls on guns.

    But, I do not support raising the age to 21.

    "Old enough to die = old enough to…"
    If you can be drafted at 18, then you should be to buy guns, drink booze, smoke weed, etc.

    1. I'd even be willing to create an exception. 18 if  you are a member of the military or a sworn officer, already trained on weapons. 21 for everyone else.

      Who knows … that might even be a useful recruiting edge.

      1. We do.

        "The Selective Service System is an independent agency of the United States government that maintains information on those potentially subject to military conscription. Virtually all male U.S. citizens and male immigrant non-citizens between the ages of 18 and 25 are required by law to have registered within 30 days of their 18th birthdays"

  3. Marco Rubio is Corwardly Gardner’s slimy twin . . .

    . . . saying you’ll “consider” something, and actually considering something, let alone actually doing what you promise to consider, all exist apart from one another on separate planets!

    . . . they’ll both say anything when it’s politically necessary in the morning, and begin backpedaling and equivocating before the sun has set.

    Still, compared to Mike Coffman . . .

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments

Posts about

Donald Trump

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo

Posts about

Colorado House

Posts about

Colorado Senate

42 readers online now


Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!