CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 29, 2009 05:30 PM UTC

Pols Poll: U.S. Senate (Republicans)

  • 18 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

With less than a year until the 2010 primaries, it’s time to start the annual Colorado Pols Polls.

As we’ve done in other election years, we regularly poll our readers on various races to gauge changing perceptions. These obviously aren’t scientific polls, but they do help to show how the perception of various candidates are changing. We’ll conduct these polls each month and then show the results to see how the winds are shifting (click to see the Democratic poll).

As always, please vote based on what you think will happen, not on who you would vote for or which candidate you support personally. Think of it this way: If you had to bet the deed to your house, who would you pick?

Who Will Be the Republican Nominee for U.S. Senate?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Comments

18 thoughts on “Pols Poll: U.S. Senate (Republicans)

  1. Ken Buck or Jane Norton. I voted Buck because he’s doing some pretty impressive fundraising but if Norton has the Party behind her, I think she’ll end up the nominee.

    1. Cleve’s a good guy.  But he doesn’t have a prayer.

      I think Jane Norton is going to win the nomination, but even though people seem to prefer Buck over Frazier at the moment, I think Frazier has a better chance of overtaking Norton.

      I still can’t decide who I WANT to win the nomination though…they’re all doing the typical early-stage primary thing.  Talk up all your conservative credentials, but don’t take a stand on anything that might cause trouble with your base.

  2. I think you guys underestimate Ryan Frazier. He has a compelling case, a convincing persona and isn’t carrying the “insider” tag burdening Jane Norton.

    I predict he will do very well in the primary and may well win the nomination. Norton isn’t that popular with the conservative wing of the GOP and Frazier is a stronger candidate, in my view, than Buck.

    If Frazier is nominated, he’ll put up a tough fight, too.

    1. …put together.  But he’s a city councilman…just like the rest of the leading candidates he has not voting history we can pick through to determine how he might vote in the Senate.

      Kind of like Michael Bennet before he got appointed…it just doesn’t make sense to commit to someone who’s a question mark, unless the alternative is almost certainly worse.

      1. that’s probably as relevant as Romanoff’s. He championed adding domestic partnerships for same-sex couples for Aurora city employees, for instance.

        Norton’s voting record is more than 20 years out of date, and Buck doesn’t have one at all. Are you suggesting Wiens is the only Republican who isn’t “a question mark”?

        1. …but yes, I think the top three are all question marks.

          That push by Frazier doesn’t bother me at all.  In fact it makes me feel better about his chance to win a general by picking up some extra independents and disaffected Democrats.

          Norton’s history makes me a little worried, especially her endorsement of Referendum C.  That was a compromise, but not a smart one.

          At least we know Buck is tough on immigration!

        2.    Frazier supporters don’t see that as a problem in a GOP primary?

            Don’t get me wrong.  That’s great for him in a general election campaign, but he has to get past the wing nuts in the primary before he gets to the general.

            In 2000, state Reps Matha Kreutz and Gary McPherson in Arapahoe County were running for state Senate seats.  Both were accused of supporting the “radical homosexual agenda” by the right wingers (IIRC, they each had the audacity to vote in favor a hate crimes bill sponsored by Ken Chloeber which included sexual orientation as a protected class) via anonymous mailings.  Both lost their respective primaries.

            Ryan Frazier did something morally right and decent in supporting Aurora’s D.P. ordinance.  For that he will be punished by the right wingers.  

        1. …Jane Norton, they’ll take Norton.  Between him and Ken Buck, they’ll take Buck.  But between the three of them, I think Frazier has a better shot than Buck to stand out and be a real dark horse candidate to beat out Norton.

      1. …but he gets around.  He’s at every event he can possibly make.  Which is what he needs to do if he wants any shot.  But he should hire a press secretary who knows what they’re doing, and stat!

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

230 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!