President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) J. Sonnenberg

(R) Ted Harvey

20%↑

15%↑

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Doug Bruce

20%

20%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

40%↑

20%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 12, 2012 09:58 PM UTC

Hickenlooper: "Fracking" To Fight Climate Change?

  • 20 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Colorado’s Democratic governor throws the conservation community a curveball on the issue of human-caused climate change, versus the controversial practice of hydraulic fracture drilling for natural gas–as the Durango Herald reports:

Hickenlooper often talked about climate issues when he was mayor of Denver, but he has been quieter on the topic since he became governor. He spent 30 minutes Tuesday morning at a conference of the Colorado Climate Network, a group of local governments that studies ways to adjust to climate change.

Acknowledging that “it drives some of my friends crazy,” the Democratic governor said embracing natural gas is the only realistic way to cut American emissions of greenhouse gases.

Hickenlooper also urged people to ramp up pressure on Congress to extend the wind-production tax credit. But he saved his strongest endorsement for a fuel that has stirred controversy in recent years.

The United States never signed the Kyoto treaty to cut greenhouse emissions, but the country is on its way to meeting the target anyway thanks to natural gas, Hickenlooper said.

“We are more than halfway toward compliance because we have these innovations in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing,” he said.

Without wading too far into the contentious underlying issue, we will say that this represents a more intelligent argument from Gov. John Hickenlooper than he’s made in the past. Last year, Hickenlooper enraged environmentalists when he claimed in an energy industry-funded ad that fracking has never resulted in groundwater contamination–a claim that has been repeatedly disproven. Later, Hickenlooper claimed that “you can drink” fracking fluid, an extremely dubious claim based on one experimental “fracking” product that is not even required to be used. In yet another gaffe, Hickenlooper absurdly claimed that fracking has “literally no risk.”

These incidents cannot help but impact Hickenlooper’s credibility on the issue.

It’s clear that the public health issues presented by “fracking” in and around Colorado communities involve more immediate challenges than those presented by global climate change, though it’s true in the abstract that natural gas contributes less to that particular problem. In this latest offering, Hickenlooper presents natural gas as a “bridge” to future energy technology, and challenges opponents to find a workable alternative.

Bottom line: we’ll give Hickenlooper credit for a more intelligent case than he has made in the past, but it’s an equivocal case at best. And the question of whether “fracking’s” incremental climate change advantage offsets public health concerns? He definitely did not settle it.

Comments

20 thoughts on “Hickenlooper: “Fracking” To Fight Climate Change?

  1. Prove it.  Prove that fracked fields are not leaking methane into the atmosphere – a greenhouse gas 72 times more potent than carbon dioxide.  Prove that it will lead to investment in true sustainable / renewable energy – natural gas will not last forever.  Prove that it will make any kind of dent in China or India’s use of coal.

    Color me a very deep shade of skeptical.  My trust level for COGCC and Hickenlooper is nil.

  2. from Cornell University concluded that, cradle to grave, natural gas is NOT cleaner than coal…nor oil. Massive fugitive emissions and a huge recovery mechanism powered by oil (mostly) more than make up for the savings obtained during combustion.

    Clean Natural Gas is as complete a misnomer as “Clean Coal”.

    Governor Frackenlooper continues to earn the moniker.

  3. fracking, is good for Colorado . . .” — J. Frackenhicker, Colorado Fracker in Chief.

    Our Governfracker has found us a real, live, honest to goodness, 21st century shmoo . . .  

  4. There’s an easy-to-discern reason why oil and gas producers are moving as quickly as they can to lease, drill and produce.  They know that eventually the average citizen will have a better understanding of the long-term negative impacts on water and air quality, climate health, plus human (and animal) health.  So producers – and the Governor – want to produce as much as they can, while they can.

  5. The oldsters here might remember that sarcastic comment from during the Viet Nam war.  

    It was a “Yeah, right…” response to the destruction of Ben Tre.  An unknown major told a reporter, “It became necessary to destroy the town to save it.”

    Welcome, Orwell.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

217 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!