Notable Links



Denver Internet Marketing by Parallel Path

Arvada Boutique Clothing Store Stella B's

Privacy Violation Good for Buck in Primary?

by: Colorado Pols

Tue Dec 15, 2009 at 10:52:08 AM MST


As The Denver Post reports:

The Colorado Supreme Court ruled Monday that a 2008 raid of a local tax preparer's office aimed at building identity-theft cases against hundreds of suspected illegal immigrants violated their Fourth Amendment right to privacy.

The 4-3 ruling was the latest and most devastating legal blow against Operation Numbers Game, an investigation launched by Weld County Sheriff John Cooke and District Attorney Ken Buck that aimed to use tax returns to identify and prosecute illegal immigrants.

The raid on Amalia's Tax and Translation, a business that caters to Spanish-speaking clients, led to the seizure and review of some 4,900 tax returns. Deputies said they found about 1,300 suspects in identity-theft and criminal-impersonation cases.

More than 100 suspected illegal immigrants were arrested because of the raid, and charges were formally filed against 70 of them. About 60 cases were then dismissed after Weld District Judge James Hartmann, ruling in one of the criminal cases, tossed evidence investigators had seized during their search of Amalia's...

...On Monday, Buck conceded Operation Numbers Game "is over," adding he will not appeal the decision. A Colorado prosecutor can appeal a case only as far as the state high court, according to Colorado law, but a defendant can appeal to a higher court.

But Buck felt the raid was justified.

"I feel the court made its decision and then later developed rationale for this decision," Buck said.

Prosecutors around the country have been watching the case closely, reportedly the first in the United States in which law enforcement sought to use tax returns - generally considered confidential under federal law - to take suspected illegal immigrants to criminal court.

Obviously this isn't altogether positive news for GOP Senate candidate Ken Buck, and it would certainly hinder his chances of winning a statewide general election. But you could make the case that this decision and subsequent media coverage actually helps Buck in a primary. If Buck can raise enough money to stay in a three-way race with Tom Wiens and Jane Norton, this is the kind of "us against the federal government" battle that Tea Party types like to identify with. And it certainly doesn't hurt his chances to raise money nationally from the same type of anti-immigrant enthusiasts that funded Tom Tancredo for so many years.

Colorado Pols :: Privacy Violation Good for Buck in Primary?
Tags: , (All Tags)

Share this post:

This alone
gets Buck 10-15% votes in a primary. Especially if he continues to defend he raid. More especially if he and Teabagger blogs both defend his raid and castigate the court.

I don't get it
two of teabagger's articles of faith are distrust of government and support of originalist constitutional intent, yet they support the government exceeding its rights to search private businesses and violate constitutional protections?

I have conflicted views, but these folks are beyond conflicted, they live in a world of delusion.


As someone who grew up with a lot of em
Still have lots of friends that are now part of the Tea Party movement.  I think that their basis is somewhat "social contract" related.  As long as one is a law abiding citizen, you have no need to worry about harmless intrusions into privacy.  (their ideas not mine)  So by this basis, investigating the statistical probability that a hispanic person is more likely to be an illegal alien means good investigative technique.  If you are here legally, you have nothing to worry about.

Now I see that there is a huge flaw here.  Most of the people that agree with this don't.  They don't see this as racism, just as statistical analysis.  When you've broken the law, there are some in the Tea Party movement that have no problem saying that you should be prosecuted in any way that leads to your conviction.

--

Senior Diving Correspondent for the Casa Bonita Reader, ask about our Sopapilla Issue.


[ Parent ]
I don't get it
two of teabagger's articles of faith are distrust of government and support of originalist constitutional intent, yet they support the government exceeding its rights to search private businesses and violate constitutional protections?

I have conflicted views, but these folks are beyond conflicted, they live in a world of delusion.


no, no - DTR,
those Constitutional rights only belong to 'mericans. Not the illegals See? And if one or two good 'mericans have their inf reviewed as part of a larger sweep for them illegals, what's the harm? Good citizens got nothin' to hide, right?

The real conflict for the Tea Party here is that the IRS already has all the filiers' information.


[ Parent ]
I don't doubt he will get support, but . . .
How does a public office holder, a prosecutor no less, violating personal privacy interests, feed a narrative of us v. them?  I understand the illegal immigrant angle, but aren't the tea parties, above all else, anti-government.  Everyone is entitled to their own conflicted belief system, but it seems ridiculous for a bunch of people who probably consider income taxes unconstitutional in the first place, to rally behind a cop that violates privacy laws to access information on the federally compelled filings. The only way this is "us v. them" is when it is translated to the Tancredo-esque "white v. brown."  

Buck can say
"I tried to slow illegal immigration and the activist liberal courts stopped me," or something like that. Plays great among certain segments in a GOP primary.

[ Parent ]
Aren't those a couple of the items listed on...
...the platform for failure?  Two for one--like those double sized Lipton teabags.

[ Parent ]
Colorado Supreme Court Upholds Illegals' Privacy Rights-Correctly
For thoughtful commentary from the other side--

http://www.peoplespresscollect...


Don't get us wrong
We don't disagree with the ruling, but Colorado Pols is about politics over policy, and therefore looking at what this means for Buck.

[ Parent ]
And you should
Just pointing out that "the other side"--i.e. conservatives/Republicans etc. aren't all "tea partiers" or lined up against this particular ruling.

[ Parent ]
What bothers me most about this ruling ...
is the close 4-3 vote. I had hoped that this would be an open-and-shut case of a Fourth Amendment violation, but clearly the state Supreme Court has three justices who are ready to trash the Bill of Rights.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?







Advertise Here!
ads@coloradopols.com


Active Users
Currently 2 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search



Colorado Pols Network


Jeffco Pols
  More >

Denver Pols
  More >













RSS 2.0



Pols Gets Mobile: ColoradoPols.com/mobile/

Colorado Pols is on Twitter: twitter.com/coloradopols

Email Pols


How to Write a Diary That Will Make the Front Page



Terms of Use/Privacy Policy



Pols Posting Policies



The Pols Penalty Box



Yard Signs!



The Pols "Mailbag"

Mailbag #1



Relevant Links

The Big Media Blog

Blog It Right

Blog For Growth

Blogometer

Business Word

Colorado Capitol Journal

Colorado Center on Law and Policy

Colorado Democratic Party

Colorado Ethics Watch

Colorado Independent

Colorado Labor Blog

Colorado Veterans for America

Colorado Legislature

Colorado Lib

Colorado Libertarian Blog

Colorado Media Matters

Colorado Progressive Coalition

Colorado Republican Party

Colorado Secretary of State

Colorado Senate Dems

Colorado Senate GOP

Colorado Young Democrats

Commentary Today

Coyote Gulch

CU Democrats

Curious Stranger

Daily Kos

Dan Willis-Rumors

Dem Notes

Democracy for Colorado

Denver Politics

East Boulder County Politics

Ed Stein Ink

Election Neutrality Now

eleXn

George in Denver

Great Education Colorado

Head First Colorado

The Hotline Political Network

Junction Daily Blog

Left in the West

Liberal and Loving It

Maintain Educational Standards in Colorado

Mount Virtus

MyDD

National Journal

On Call

Peak Dems

Political State Report

Progress Now

Prometheus

Project Vote Smart

Radio Free Denver

Senate Guru

Slapstick Politics

Steam Powered Opinions

Square State

Stygius

TalkLeft

The Thicket

The Bell Policy Center

The Hypothetical Wren

ThomasMC.com

Toilet Paper Online

TRACER Campaign Finance

View From a Height

Walter in Denver

Wash Park Prophet

Western Democrat


Colorado Pols is wholly owned by Colorado Pols, LLC
webmaster-at-coloradopols.com

Powered by: SoapBlox