President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) J. Sonnenberg

(R) Ted Harvey

20%↑

15%↑

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Doug Bruce

20%

20%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

40%↑

20%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 30, 2009 09:48 PM UTC

At Least It's Not Your State Capitol

  • 14 Comments
  • by: Phoenix Rising

(Maybe they can just sell sponsorships – promoted by ClubTwitty)

(And if legislators have it their way, it won’t be theirs either…)

From AZCentral:

Call it a sign of desperate times: Legislators are considering selling the House and Senate buildings where they’ve conducted state business for more than 50 years.

Apparently, the logic is…

“What are our choices?” asked McComish, a Phoenix Republican. “We could cut more, or we could raise taxes more. Borrowing over the long term, we think, is better for the people, better for the economy.”

Nevermind that by borrowing, they’ll have to raise taxes even more to cover the interest.  Why not just issue a bond?

Comments

14 thoughts on “At Least It’s Not Your State Capitol

  1. Governor Owens was seriously considering something similar for Colorado buildings back in 04-05.  I don’t remember if Colorado actually sold any buildings, though.

    https://www.cu.edu/sg/messages

    http://www.state.co.us/gov_dir

    I love the penny-wise and pound-foolish philosophy of “borrowing over the long term is better.”  I wish this legislator would just come right out and say “I don’t want to put my job on the line by even considering raising taxes, so I’m going to push this problem off about 99 years, when I’ll be long gone before anyone realizes how much this idea screws the state.”  

    1. resurfaces every time the state hits a fiscal crisis. Owens DID consider it during the fiscal mess earlier in the decade. No buildings were actually sold or leased.

      An estimate at that time showed something like $6 billion in state building assets belong to higher ed institutions – that’s where the REAL money is if Colorado were to do the lease-back option.

      That idea surfaced very briefly during the last budget discussions during the 2009 session but nobody took it seriously. It wouldn’t surprise me if it came up again.

  2. I have to say that has merit.  “The chair recognizes the senator from the gatorade thirst quenching __ district” or just a giant screen with commercials in the lobby.  I mean people already think their legislators are paid for by various interests…

        1. the Miller-Coors Education Funding Act of 2010 is passed. Will the Mrs. Butterworth’s Sergeant at Arms please deliver the bill to the Verizon Senate for its consideration.

          And with this gavel, I adjourn the Colorado House-Mondays-at-8pm-on-KDVR of Representatives.

    1. …the reps in their legislative houses were businessmen.  So, it wasn’t so far fetched as having the honcho from CF&I representing Pueblo.

      “What’s good for CF&I is good for the country.”  Or something.

  3. Throw up a bunch of tents for prisoners in the building a la Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County — although, granted, the tents wouldn’t be outdoors like Arpaio’s. The legislators can work around the convicts.

    While the state is looking to sell and lease back selected properties, it also may try to contract out the operations of some prisons. The concessions provision is expected to be included within the new budget proposal, and legislative analysts believe it could generate as much as $100 million (on top of the sale/leaseback revenue) for state coffers. Private, for-profit prison operators would bid for the right to manage selected facilities, but the state would maintain ownership.

    1. resulted in delay in the phasing out of old and dangerous cars that were past their useful life.  The result, earlier this year, was that people died.

      Sale/leaseback deals are largely driven by taxes on the private party side.  Changing tax laws so that such absurd ideas don’t make sense and using the money raised by the change to provide federal fiscal aid to states would make more sense than this plan.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

222 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!