CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 14, 2009 05:30 PM UTC

Boring the Voters to Death

  • 13 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Republican Scott Gessler is running for Secretary of State after many years as the Republican Party’s attorney, but we hadn’t heard much from him until an email he sent out last Friday. The email, which is his first (to our knowledge, anyway) outreach to a larger audience is full of…well…lawyer stuff.

You can read the full email below, which would be more than we did because it bored the shit out of us after just a few paragraphs. Granted, it’s hard to find “sexy” issues to highlight when you are running for Secretary of State, but the last thing you want to do as a candidate is to send out horribly boring drivel like this — especially if it is your first outreach.

Can’t say we’re eagerly awaiting the next email from Gessler.

Back in early January I announced my bid for Colorado Secretary of State.  I have entered the race in order to make positive changes, based on my experience drawn from years of practicing election law, running small businesses, serving as an Army officer, and working as a federal prosecutor. My goal is to bring meaningful leadership to that office, so we have election systems that are fair and trustworthy.

But this last legislative session really drove home the need for real changes at the Secretary of State’s office. For example, the Democrat-dominated General Assembly just passed legislation – House Bill 1326 — that greatly damages our right to initiative.

Overall, HB 1326 is a lawyer’s dream come true – if you are trying to stop initiatives, that is. First, it allows someone to challenge qualifying signatures on any basis, welcoming any clever attorney to dream up a reason why a citizen’s signature should not count.

HB 1326 also includes a “bounty-hunter provision” – lawyers can collect their attorney fees from circulators for certain violations. It might sound reasonable on its face, but there are three big problems. First, it scares away circulators – even if they do nothing wrong, they have to hire an attorney to defend themselves. Second, it gives challengers a huge incentive to throw a lot of mud at the wall, hoping that something will stick and they’ll win attorney fees. Third, it will attract litigation like flies – and we should give Colorado voters a chance to vote on initiatives, not tie initiatives up in court.

HB 1326 also games the system in favor of challengers by changing normal court rules. If a signature collector doesn’t show up in court every person who signed the petition would have his or her name involuntarily struck. We’ve had the initiative process for about 100 years, now, and this is the most unfair, draconian rule designed to prevent Coloradan’s voice from being heard.

The list of injustices in this legislation goes on and on. For the first time, signatures can be struck for even the most harmless error.

HB 1326 is almost entirely form over substance. It was penned by those angry at the initiative process, those who seem to feel that we should not have as many chances to vote on initiatives. But the fact is, this bill creates open season for protestors – and their actions are not tempered by a sense of justice. Rather, they want more legal tools to defeat their political opponents in court, rather than facing open debate in front of the voters.

My opponent for Secretary of State, Governor Ritter’s appointee Bernie Beuscher, strongly supported this damaging and unfair legislation.

Perhaps he just didn’t know enough about the initiative process to understand how bad this is.

But Colorado voters deserve someone who will stand up for voters, and make shore we in Colorado keep the freedom to propose legislation, without legal harassment.  

Secretary Beuscher has been in office for four months, and one of his most significant acts is to support this assault on our right to initiative.

Sincerely,

Scott Gessler

Candidate for Colorado Secretary of State

www.scottgessler.com 720-839-6637

Comments

13 thoughts on “Boring the Voters to Death

  1. That’s all he’s got?

    Go ask any voter on election day whether there are too many initiatives on the ballot. Guess what they’ll say.

    Good luck with that one.  

  2. Given the 2010 landscape, as a Republican do you really want your signature issue to be the grave injustice of a bill that Senator Penry voted for?

  3. I disagree with Pols emphasis on form over substance. Let him bore me, if he is proposing an intelligent take on subtle issues. Unfortunately, he isn’t. He’s either pandering to what he perceives as the state’s zeitgeist (eg, criticize “clever lawyers,” hopefully distancing himself from the fact that he himself is a lawyer), or is a mere reduced rather than refined echo of that slice of the zeitgeist himself, neither of which are good leadership qualities.

    1. a list of all the lawsuits that Scott Gessler has ever filed. I’m sure there are a few that would raise eyebrows (especially in light of his vilification of his chosen profession).

      1. he has tried to keep off the ballot.  Also, as SOS, wouldn’t it be his job to enforce the election laws, regardless of his personal opinion about their wisdom?

  4. Boring is desirable.

    Look at how exciting Coffman made the job.  Six months before the primaries, County Clerks still didn’t know whether they’d be allowed to use their voting systems, with no certified replacements available to them.

    I think we all like nice boring elections where nothing goes wrong.

    I have no doubt that head-to-head, a competent manager like Bernie can out-boring a flame-throwing lawyer like Gessler.

    And that’s a good thing.

  5. And the “right of the people to govern themselves” is about as sexy an issue you can get when running for SoS. He just needs to learn to not bloviate so much.

    Personally, if I were running I would be campaigning on the need to simply election laws. Every year the legislature adds more layers of confusion rather than any meaningful “election reform” which, to me, would be making clearm concose instructions in the statutes which county clerks could follow without needing endless explanation from the SoS’s staff.

    Now that I worek in the area of election management, it really drives home the need for a lot of basic KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid) mentality to be applied to election laws.

    1. I knew you couldn’t stay retired for too long. 😉

      Seriously though, we miss your insight a lot. Hope the writing is coming along well.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

204 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!