U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 28, 2009 04:31 PM UTC

Mike May Takes Gullible Dems To School

  • 5 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

It’s been a little while since we last discussed Senate Bill 228, the much-debated repeal of the Arveschoug-Bird general fund limit statutorily enacted in 1991 in a misguided (and ultimately futile) attempt to forestall passage of the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights. After some instructive spectacle from unserious Senate Republicans, not to mention an encouraging related decision by the Colorado Supreme Court, a compromise on SB-228 emerged that would repeal the limit, while making reasonable accomodation for the thing Republicans claimed they want “protected”–transportation funding. In the end it was possible to make that accomodation to the agreement of most parties, since the idea that any legislature would pass a budget that eliminated transportation funding (as the GOP insists is right around the corner) is kind of, well, ludicrous. Senate Bill 228 seemed, until yesterday, slotted in greased grooves for passage.

Until, as the Denver Post reports:

The House on Monday nearly torpedoed a deal brokered by Gov. Bill Ritter to eliminate a limit on budget growth in exchange for potential road funding.

Instead of going along with the Democratic governor’s proposal, the House initially amended Senate Bill 228 to take out the earmarked funding for highways and building projects and send that money to schools.

The Democratic-led House approved the amendment, offered by Republican Rep. Tom Massey of Poncha Springs, on a 32-31 vote, with six Democrats joining the effort.

But several hours later, the House reversed itself and stripped out the amendment on a 34-29 vote, with four of the six Democrats flipping.

After the debate, Rep. Lois Court, D-Denver, a co-sponsor of the bill, said the Republican amendment was an attempt to sabotage the bill by appealing to Democrats’ predilection for education funding.

However, House Minority Leader Mike May, R-Parker, said the amendment, which he co-wrote, was offered to prove a point. [Pols emphasis]

“It is extremely disingenuous for the Democrats to remove this spending cap under the guise of creating transportation funding,” May said. “We proved today just how easy it is to siphon those so-called transportation dollars right out of the bill and put them wherever you want.”

A couple of things happened here. First, the normally quite reasonable Rep. Tom Massey was apparently used as a Trojan Horse for this “gotcha!” amendment–this, we have to concede, was a really smart (if cynical and bridge-burning) move by Minority Leader Mike May. And as you can see, a bunch of Democrats swallowed the bait hook, line and sinker.

Seriously, didn’t any of these people stop to wonder why all the Republicans were suddenly lining up to vote for something they would never, ever normally vote for?

The fact that four out of the six Democrats realized they had been schooled in time to demand another vote helps a little, but they had already played right into Mike May’s hands by that time–producing this article, which was the whole point of the exercise. As for Benefield and Pommer? Our only explanation is that some people have trouble admitting when they’ve, you know, been had.

Bottom line? Hasn’t changed–blindly restrictive statutes that strip power from the legislature to do its job are bad. They’re bad when times are good, and disastrous in situations like today’s economic crisis. And no legislature interested in self-preservation is ever going to meaningfully deprioritize transportation funding in the Colorado state budget. Ever. All the rest of this is cheesy grandstanding, borne of the right-wing cultivated “axiom” that the people can’t trust those they elect to do their jobs.

Hats off to May though, on a purely tactical level we are forced to admit this was pretty good stuff. He got exactly what he wanted–which was really nothing more than a talking point–but he got it and a few Democrats handed it to him guilelessly. He seems to be better at game-face than most of his colleagues, we seriously doubt Dave “The Resume” Balmer (for example) would have been capable of this. Certainly better at it than his counterpart in the Senate.

Comments

5 thoughts on “Mike May Takes Gullible Dems To School

  1. Not just that the Dems lined up to prove the Repub arguments correct, but that aside from politics they were happy to blow off one key part of the budget to put more money into education. Yo, we expect you guys to balance out the pain evenly.

    1. It wouldn’t have affected the budget until the recession ended, so really they were just guaranteeing that transportation would lose its SB 1 transfer in the future, when the economy was better, so education funding would have been shored up.

      An idiotic move, to say the least, but I just felt the need to clarify.

      Gotta give credit where credit is due: One of the best tactical moves by either party in several sessions. Well played, Rep. May. Well played.

      Glad to see the bill return to its compromise form, though, which provides stable transportation and capital construction funding while building our reserve to twice its current size.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

44 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!