U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(D) Julie Gonzales

(R) Janak Joshi

80%

40%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser
55%

50%↑
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Hetal Doshi

50%

40%↓

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson

(D) A. Gonzalez
50%↑

20%↓
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

50%↑

40%↓

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Wanda James

(D) Milat Kiros

80%

20%

10%↓

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Alex Kelloff

(R) H. Scheppelman

60%↓

40%↓

30%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

30%↑

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

55%↓

45%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Shannon Bird

(D) Manny Rutinel

45%↓

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
March 16, 2009 10:13 PM UTC

Whistling Past The "Party of No"

  •  
  • by: Colorado Pols

As the landmark decision this morning by the Colorado Supreme Court is digested, affirming the authority of the state government to take reasonable measures not in conflict with the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR) to preserve state revenue, one thing is clear: a lot of GOP talking points just got ripped into bite-size pieces.

The AP previewed over the weekend the first likely impact of this decision–we’re done screwing around with Arveschoug-Bird.

Majority Democrats in the Colorado Senate are moving ahead with plans to change the state’s budget rules without Republican support.

Bipartisan talks aimed at reaching a compromise broke down last week. Senate leaders plan to take a vote on the original bill on Tuesday.

They originally planned to vote Monday but delayed that so they could meet with editorial boards to build support for the measure. They also want to review a new Supreme Court ruling on a property tax bill for possible guidance…

Guidance delivered. The court’s decision should provide the legal backing needed by the legislature to complete passage of Senate Bill 228 without further obstruction, and for Governor Ritter to sign it. It’s not really a secret that Ritter was waiting for this decision before giving any indication what he would do on Arveschoug-Bird: even his overcautious, pedantically-calculating staff should be able to see the way clear now. Signing this bill will reap far more positive benefits for Ritter in terms of mollifying his base than the few increasingly irrelevant has-beens stroking out with rage today can hurt him.

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

78 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!