https://www.cruz.senate.gov/files/documents/Bills/20170103_TermLimitsBill.pdf
The short version, (not that the bill is long at all) no more than 3 terms in the House, and 2 in the Senate. That’s total terms, they don’t have to be consecutive. Once you’ve served your limit, you can’t be appointed or re-elected. You’re done.
I have always liked the idea of term limits for Congresscritters, too many people in D.C. have been there so long, their thinking has twisted. Being able to stay at the table indefinitely has led to the fight to stay there becoming all important. The running of government has become secondary to the campaigning to stay part of it.
Is this a panacea to fix all ills in politics? No. But we have a Professional Political Class who have come to believe that Washington D.C. is the only part of the country that matters. Maybe having fresh faces and fresh thinking entering Congress on a regular basis will lead to better government. This last election has shown that the status quo isn’t all that popular.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: sagebrush
IN: Rep. Jeff Hurd Switches To Tele Town Halls Ahead Of “Drill Baby Drill” Bill
BY: davebarnes
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Wong21fr
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Gorky Pulviczek
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Wong21fr
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Bennet, Hick Hard “NO” On Republican Spending Resolution
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Teller County Sheriff Guy Launches Half-Assed Campaign for Governor
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Bennet, Hick Hard “NO” On Republican Spending Resolution
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
There are a number of states that have term limits on their legislators. I've gone looking, and don't seem to find anything that indicates the term limits have made legislators as wise as Solon, as fair as Solomon, or as incorruptible as Caesar's wife. Or done much of anything positive, no matter what or how "positive" is measured.
Term limits have caused turnover – leaving more power with the permanent staff, lobbyists who "inform" the legislators, and donors who are willing to pay now and pay later for those who want to move to a different job.
And as for the last election showing "the status quo isn’t all that popular", 90% of Senators and 97% of incumbents who ran for re-election are back in Washington. The system may not be popular – but majorities across the nation seem to tolerate THEIR Congress critters pretty well.
Has term limits been a total disaster here? We've had them for over 20 years now in Colorado. And if we had been able to put our federal level elected "public servants" under the amendment back then it still would have passed. People want change, and term limits are a pretty popular idea. I don't know how much chance it has of getting out of Congress, but it should be interesting to see if this goes anywhere.
90% of Senators and 97% of incumbents…..are back in Washington"
Exactly the point. And that "power of incumbency" usually becomes greater with every successive term.
I support term limits for Congress. Limits were not imposed in the Constitution when written, because there was a sense elective public service was just that, and Congress was only in session part time. Andrew Jackson actually resigned his Senate seat and went back to Tennessee stating he was "bored".
Charlie Rangle (48 years), Ted Kennedy (48 years), Strom Thurman (48 years) , Robert Byrd (58 years). Our Constitution and the Union are perpetual institutions – our "public servants" should not be.
I would also like to see included on that proposed amendment limiting a Supreme Court justice to a single ten year term.