UPDATE: Another damning fact-check of a pro-Mike Coffman ad from 9NEWS today, this one based on false claims we discussed in this space last week:
Republican Rep. Mike Coffman hopes his latest television ad convinces voters his Democratic opponent, state Sen. Morgan Carroll, can’t be trusted.
The four-term incumbent’s 30-second spot claims Carroll – who works a personal injury lawyer at Bachus & Shanker — pushed bills “making it easier to sue doctors, small businesses, even nurses.”
Accusing a lawmaker of pushing legislation to line her own pockets is a serious claim, and the Coffman campaign doesn’t have the facts to back it up…
To support this claim, the Coffman campaign is pointing to Carroll’s vote against an earlier draft of the same good Samaritan bill in a committee hearing February 2006.
Carroll did vote against the bill in committee, but she voted for it when it came to the House floor.
Just like we said when we discussed the same attack on Morgan Carroll in a mail piece last week. But more interesting still is the response from Coffman’s campaign to 9NEWS:
Why no one takes fact checks seriously. [Pols emphasis]
And there’s a quote that needs to be in a mail piece, folks! Original post follows.
—–
Alan Gathright at Denver7’s Politifact Colorado fact-checking outfit takes a look at a new National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) ad targeting CD-6 Democratic candidate Morgan Carroll over…well, it’s a little bit convoluted:
The dark, grainy ad begins with an image of the U.S. Capitol building and the narrator saying, “Washington has a spending problem — and Morgan Carroll would make it worse.”
“In the (Colorado) Legislature, Carroll racked up $11 billion in new spending, nearly doubling the state budget,” the narrator continues…
In this latest NRCC attack ad, the apparent goal is to hit Carroll for being a lawmaker of either party in the Colorado General Assembly. After all, the “$11 billion in new spending” they’re referring to is from the state budget, which is one of the most bipartisan exercises in Colorado politics today:
Lawmakers exercise most of their control over the state’s general fund, which was $9.6 billion in the 2015-16 fiscal year — or 38.4 percent of the overall budget.
Yet Carroll did vote for the Senate conference committee’s budget bill, which passed on a bipartisan 31-2 vote. What the NRCC ad doesn’t mention is that Republicans control the Senate — not Democrats like Carroll. [Pols emphasis]
Both Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper and Republican Senate leaders praised the bipartisan collaboration on the $25 billion budget that was described as “reasonable, responsible and delivered on time,” by Sen. Kent Lambert, the Republican chairman of the the Joint Budget Committee.
Much like the mail piece we highlighted earlier this week attacking Carroll for voting against a bill she in fact supported ten years ago, this ad depends on the viewer not knowing anything about the state legislature–above all the fact that a majority of the budget is not under control of legislators at all, and the budget passed by Colorado lawmakers Carroll is under attack for was supported nearly unanimously by Democrats and Republicans alike.
In other words the ad is complete bullshit, and very deliberately so. Whoever brainstormed this ad knew enough about the process to find Carroll’s vote, which means they knew enough to know this ad is 100% wrong from letter to spirit. It’s worse when the totality of the falsehood is such that it’s impossible for it be an accident, and that’s the case here.
As always, here’s hoping the debunking spreads as fast and far as the lie.
Fat chance, we know.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Gabe Evans, Jason Crow: Yin And Yang On Pete Hegseth
BY: joe_burly
IN: Lowering the Price of Eggs by Banning Transgender Athletes
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Gabe Evans, Jason Crow: Yin And Yang On Pete Hegseth
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Gabe Evans, Jason Crow: Yin And Yang On Pete Hegseth
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: How Will Colorado’s Gabe Evans Balance GOP and His Swing District’s Priorities As a New Member of Congress?
BY: kwtree
IN: Lowering the Price of Eggs by Banning Transgender Athletes
BY: IndependentProgressive
IN: Lowering the Price of Eggs by Banning Transgender Athletes
BY: bullshit!
IN: Gabe Evans, Jason Crow: Yin And Yang On Pete Hegseth
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Gabe Evans, Jason Crow: Yin And Yang On Pete Hegseth
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Does anyone take liberal media fact checks seriously? What about Hillary Clinton's lies? I guess those aren't on the liberal media's agenda.
When it comes to lies and total fabrications, I gotta say you Repugs are tops! Of course you're kinda forced into that situation since facts and the truth aren't helpful to you.
They're also the worst informed. NPR listeners score highest on general knowledge of domestic and world affairs. Fox viewers score the worst. No wonder the Donald is so fond of those low, low, lowest info voters.
Hillary Clinton is the biggest liar in American history. Who fact checks her?
How do you decide whether to scream "Hillary Clinton" or "Nancy Pelosi"? They are both excellent non-sequiturs.
HA!
This guy…
Fluffy – you might want to make Google your friend. Search "biggest liar in America". You won't find Hillary anywhere near the top of any list.
What about Hillary Clinton's lies? Lay them out and let's compare them to the shit the dumpster spews out. Bring it on asshole. Oh that's right. You are in your one and run mode. Post some shit to distract folks from what a lying asshole Coffman is and then scurry back to your mom's basement.
The stink of desperation is on Coffman to produce such a dishonest piece of advertising and Republicans are always touting what standup and honest folks they are.
There is actually an answer to this question. PoliTifact checked. Hillay's recod and found she was false ormostly false 13 percent of the time. Trump was false or mostly false 53 prcent of the time. Trump therefore lies more than four times as much as Hillary and slightly more than hlaf of his statements are lies.
This one's rich. If you have time for helping of word-salad, at 2:30 you can listen to Drumpf talk about how we have to fix the tax code so we stop the very rich who aren't paying taxes from getting away with their evasion!
On the plus side, the ads do mention Morgan Carroll's name about 20 times along with her name in large print and a ham-handed attempt to Photoshop her in an unflattering light.
Morgan has been a two-term state rep and a two-term state senator in Aurora. So, that part of CD6 knows and respects her. We need to get her recognized in other parts of CD6 and these ads has made it that much easier. (Who's running against Coffman? Oh, Morgan Carroll.) Thanks, Mikey!