President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump



CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*


CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*


CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Anna Stout





CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Jerry Sonnenberg

(R) Richard Holtorf

(R) Heidi Ganahl

(R) Deborah Flora





CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Doug Lamborn*


CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*


CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen


CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Scott James




State Senate Majority See Full Big Line





State House Majority See Full Big Line





Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 26, 2016 11:18 am

Majorities Matter: Anti-Vaxxers Win As GOP Senate Locks Down

  • by: Colorado Pols

AP reports via the Greeley Tribune on the death yesterday of House Bill 16-1164, which would have given the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment control of the state’s system of documenting self-claimed exemptions from childhood immunization guidelines:

The state House backed off the proposed database Monday, when it was scheduled for a vote. The legislative maneuver means the database proposal is dead for the year.

Democratic sponsors had enough support to steer the database through the House. But the proposal faced certain death in the GOP Senate, where some Republicans complain the state Health Department has already overreached by contacting parents about their children’s immunizations. [Pols emphasis]

“The public health of Colorado was not enough to convince opponents of the bill,” said Rep. Dan Pabon, a Denver Democrat who proposed the database. “The politics around the ‘I word,’ or immunizations, just got to be too intense.”

Colorado law on childhood vaccinations is among the most lenient of any state in America. Parents are allowed to claim an “exemption” from school immunization requirements for any personal reason they choose, beyond more common exemptions granted elsewhere for religious or other specific objections. This bill wouldn’t have changed that, simply centralizing the gathering of the information so as to better understand why the state has one of the lowest rates of vaccinations in the nation.

The failure of the vaccine database bill makes Colorado one of only three states with no central tracking of childhood immunizations, Pabon said. [Pols emphasis]

In short, this was a battle between public health experts defending science, and politicians protecting those who reject or at least question the science behind vaccines in public health policy.

“It has to do with what authority the state has over parents” who object to vaccines, said Sen. Kevin Lundberg, R-Berthoud. “A lot of parents don’t disagree necessarily with all vaccinations. But they do disagree with the volume and schedule of vaccinations.”

In 2015, legislation that would have made it even easier for parents to “exempt” their children from vaccines and attend public school failed against the backdrop of outbreaks of measles and other diseases preventable by vaccination. The issue hasn’t been in the headlines to the same degree in 2016, but the passion on both sides of this issue is never more than one headline away.

With that said, the political consequences of being on the wrong side of this fundamental public health issue appear very serious to us. Polls show the overwhelming majority of the public supports vaccination of school-age children, with almost 80% saying vaccination should be mandatory for healthy kids.

Worth keeping in mind when Republicans celebrate how they “protected” our “right” to not vaccinate our kids.


21 thoughts on “Majorities Matter: Anti-Vaxxers Win As GOP Senate Locks Down

  1. But D's and R's are both reasonable actors on the political stage. Both sides should have equal standing with voters, no matter any stupid "facts" or polling.   And, as everyone knows, a bipartisan solution, where both sides give something, and Democrats give just a bit more, is always the best solution. 

    If a few kids have to die from some long conquered disease, so be it. 

  2. As far as I'm concerned, parents can do whatever they want.  But, if they choose not to vaccinate, their kids can't come out in public, ever, until they are vaccinated.  There's your choice Sen. Looneybird.

    1. Should definitely not be allowed to attend public schools and private schooling should be their own financial responsiblity just as Catholic schooling has always been the responsibility of Catholic parents. Private schools can make their own choices. They'd be wise to choose "no way".

      If a parent can't find a public or private school willing to expose students to their dangerous unvaccinated children home schooling would be the remaining option. Exceptions can safely be made for the tiny percentage of children who would actually be endangered by vaccinations for medical reasons. A very small percentage of unvaccinated in a vaccinated population is safely acceptable. But a doctor must verify he child's medical condition based exemption and strict no wiggle room limits on the percent of medically excused chldren in any given school should be set and enforced.

      Those who don't vaccinate for religious reasons can organize their own private religious schools at their own expense.

      1. A common sense response. While I was a small kid "back in the dark ages," there was never any issue surrounding vaccinations. You just got them, unless one's parents were part of one of the real small religious groups that proscribe vaccinations. 


      Page 2.

      It’s time to California these fuckers.

      Let’s also remember that the schools that have the most of these tiny little time bombs are filled with kids from neighborhoods that are white, uptight, and not always to the right. Chalkbeat put up a database with immunization rates last year (scroll down to see where patient zero will come from in your neighborhood).

      1. Thanks for the link…I didn't see anything on there I would be willing to catch.

        Of all the right wing idiots, these idiots are probably the most idiotic…unless its those idiots at the end of the link Dio has posted below.

    1. Microcephaly may be  due to  pesticides sprayed in drinking water, rather than to the Zika virus. It's hard to sort out because they both occur in the same Brazilian and Argentinian poor slum populations where the drinking water is a breeding ground for Zika-carrying mosquitos, and also heavily sprayed with pyriproxifen, a larvae-killing chemical manufactured by Sumitomo (a Monsanto affiliate).

      There is as yet no scientific data definitively proving either the pesticide or the Zika virus causes microcephaly.

      1. So you'd probably be in favor of some additional research — the kind that requires physicians and scientists who do good work, but not necessarily for free??  And, until more definitive proof of causal agency is uncovered, maybe developing some contingency control and risk mitigation procedures and planning — not necessarily always done for free??

        i recognize that all knowledge always comes with a price, but ignorance always eventually comes with a much higher price …

        1. Yes, further research needed and paid for, although it will probably be 50 degrees below zero in Brazil before there is any serious research which might implicate Sumimoto (Monsanto's affiliate) for contributing to disabling birth defects in infants.

          Let's all get on the Zika train, instead. Ebola hysteria worked out so well for so many politicians.

  3. If one can recall the 2015 legislative session, Senator Lundberg was a prominent voice in claiming, erroneously, that IUDs are aborti-facients. Looks like he's wrong yet again.

    1. I'd like to suggest a Mad Lib for that one.

      If one can recall the [year] legislative session, Senator Lundberg was a prominent voice in claiming, erroneously, that [anything] is/are [some crazy bullshit statement]. Looks like he's wrong yet again.


Leave a Comment

Recent Comments

Posts about

Donald Trump

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo

Posts about

Colorado House

Posts about

Colorado Senate

72 readers online now


Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!