U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(D) Julie Gonzales

(R) Janak Joshi

80%

40%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser
55%

50%↑
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Hetal Doshi

50%

40%↓

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson

(D) A. Gonzalez
50%↑

20%↓
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

50%↑

40%↓

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Wanda James

(D) Milat Kiros

80%

20%

10%↓

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Alex Kelloff

(R) H. Scheppelman

60%↓

40%↓

30%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

30%↑

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

55%↓

45%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Shannon Bird

(D) Manny Rutinel

45%↓

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 29, 2016 11:32 AM UTC

Prez Voting at Caucuses Could Cause Problems for Republicans

  •  
  • by: Jason Salzman

(Promoted by Colorado Pols)

houseforgopchairPOLS UPDATE: Apropos, the Denver Post’s editorial board slams the decision by Colorado Republicans to abort their presidential caucus polling this year:

The Colorado Republican Party’s decision last summer to jettison a presidential poll at its caucus on Tuesday looks worse with every passing day. Except for the actual delegates to July’s national convention, Colorado Republicans who want to have a say in the future of their party have been stripped of any role in the most interesting and surprising nominating struggle in decades…

GOP leaders have never provided a satisfactory reason for forgoing a presidential preference poll, although party chairman Steve House suggested on radio at one point that too many Republicans would otherwise flock to their local caucus.

Imagine that: party officials fearing that an interesting race might propel thousands of additional citizens to participate. But of course that might dilute the influence of elites and insiders. You can see why that could upset the faint-hearted.

—–

Last year, Colorado Republicans eliminated their nonbinding caucus votes on presidential candidates, but the voting will go on anyway, “for fun,” in Adams County, according to Adams Country GOP chair Anil Mathai.

Two Denver caucuses, in state house districts two and six, will also hold informal votes, according to GOP activist Florence Urbish Sebern in a Facebook post..

The question is, will the Republicans who participate in these straw polls, and then go on to become delegates to the National Republican Convention, be able to vote for a candidate other than the one they favored in their “for-fun” straw-poll vote.

“Those delegates would not be disqualified,” wrote Josh Putnam, an expert on the caucus process, when asked if Colorado delegates would be banned from voting under GOP rules. “If anything, the worst that could happen is that any delegate chosen from that county would be bound at the convention. And that would depend on one of that group actually being chosen to attend the national convention.”

Putnam emphasizes that many GOP delegates from Colorado could go to the national Republican convention committeed to supporting specific presidential candidates. (I’ve explained this here.)

“There are a lot of folks who are pedaling this fiction that CO (& WY) will have unbound delegations,” Putnam explains on Twitter. “This is not the case.”

“The members of the Colorado delegation to Cleveland who align with a candidate when they file to run as a delegate are bound to that candidate,” writes Putnam, who’s a lecturer in the Department of Political Science the University of Georgia–and whose blog is widely cited. “Presumably even if that candidate drops out (as there are no rules in the COGOP bylaws covering such an event). That’s all based on the RNC interpretation of the COGOP rules.”

Adams County Republican Chair Anil Mathai announced his county’s straw poll on KLZ 560-AM’s Rush to Reason.

“Across the state, there is no straw poll, but in Adams County we have a non-binding unofficial ‘for fun’ straw poll,” said Mathai on air. “I want to hear the voice of the people. So we will have one for U.S.presidential candidates as of Feb. 1 and also one for U.S. Senate candidates out of Colorado.”

“In Adams County, we’re just doing it for fun,” Mathai emphasized again at the end of the interview.

But whether Mathai’s notion of fun comports with the Republican rules is another matter.

Initially, the statewide GOP straw poll was supposed to be nonbinding as well. But the national Republican Party told Colorado Republicans that if they held a straw poll, it had to be binding. So Colorado Republicans decided against having one, sharply reducing their power in the national presidential nomination process–even though Colorado GOP rules allows delegates to commit to presidential candidates anyway.

It looks like the unofficial straw polls could cause problems for some Republicans down the road, if the national convention is close and national Republicans start snooping around for reasons to disqualify delegates.

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

71 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!