State Senator Ellen Roberts (R-Durango) tried, poorly, to float her name for U.S. Senate (or Congress) last month, telling the Durango Herald that she considered herself a “long-shot candidate.” But with Rep. Mike Coffman publicly declining to run for U.S. Senate, Roberts has another opportunity to launch the ol’ trial balloon.
It’s not going well.
Roberts has been absolutely bludgeoning herself in media interviews lately. It’s only been a few days, but Roberts is suffering from so many self-inflicted wounds that we almost want to call for an intervention.
Last week the editorial board of her hometown Durango Herald ripped into Roberts for her absurdly transparent attempts to appear both “pro choice” and staunchly anti-abortion. This week the national publication The Nation obliterated Roberts’ ridiculous explanation for opposing funding for Colorado’s very successful long-acting contraception (LARC) program. This is not some sort of “liberal media conspiracy,” either; this terrible press is all directly linked to statements and botched explanations that have come straight out of Roberts’ mouth.
Consider Roberts’ latest mistake on KNUS Radio, as chronicled by Jason Salzman:
“If I get in the race, i’d love to delve into that with you in the fall,” says Robert when asked if Roe was correctly decided #copolitics
— Jason Salzman (@BigMediaBlog) June 3, 2015
Roberts asked if she believes in Roe but declined to answer until she’s in race. “#copolitics
— Jason Salzman (@BigMediaBlog) June 3, 2015
Yup, there’s Roberts, flat-out refusing to answer a softball question about abortion because she is not officially a candidate for U.S. Senate. So, um, Sen. Roberts, what did you think they were going to ask you about? Your garden?
"All of them, Katie."
Come on, even Gunther thought Roe v Wade's reasoning was a joke if Locher remains bad precedent
It is fun to watch Colorado Pols panic over Ellen Roberts though.
Truth now…. you do Moderatus and dustpuppy, right? You just like making both sides look like idiots?
I have no other accounts, just me. Sorry.
How else do you explain Colorado Pols's obsession with Ellen Roberts since Coffman dropped out?
Entertainment value? You know. The only reason anyone here reads you?
Let's not trash Ellen too much. Wasn't it Justice Clarence Thomas who claimed to have not given much thought or discussion to Roe v. Wade when he was before the Senate Judiciary Committee?