Hillary/Bennet 2016: Possibility or Joke?

For a relative latecomer to politics, Michael Bennet sure has led a charmed life. Prior to politics he was a Big Money guy working for one of Colorado's leading Conservatives. Then…

As one of President Barack Obama's early advisers on education issues, Bennet was speculated in late 2008 as a frontrunner for Obama's United States Secretary of Education. He was instead appointed by Governor Bill Ritter to fill the U.S. Senate seat vacated by Ken Salazar when Salazar became Secretary of the Interior in January 2009. Bennet was elected in the 2010 Senate election where he defeated Republican Ken Buck.

Michael Bennet is now serving his first full term and would be up for reelection in 2016.

Though he is fairly new to public elective office, he has proven to be a consummate insider and competent press manipulator. He played an effective, yet widely criticized role, in the early machinations that led to a Public Option-less Obamacare. He had to lift nothing besides a well timed press release in that effort. Bennet's latest political responsibility has been deemed a failure by many.

As Chairman of the DSCC for this last election cycle, Bennet led Senate Democrats into a historic minority and proved useless in electing his Democratic peer, former Senator Mark Udall. But he was still able to get some favorable press immediately after the losing election.

And the charmed life, or at least the favorable press, continued yesterday as Bennet got a top mention as a Veep possibility for the almost pre-ordained Hillary Clinton presidency:

The potential opposition is so weak that Clinton might wind up not even debating during the primaries, which many Democrats view as a mixed blessing.

Some advisers expect a push for diversity on the ticket. So the shortlist also is expected to include Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro, Labor Secretary Tom Perez, Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey and perhaps California Attorney General Kamala Harris, who is running for U.S. Senate.The Clinton team knows it can’t campaign with the swagger of a presumptive nominee because the air of inevitability was so damaging last time around. That said, some advisers are already privately talking up potential running mates, with Sens. Michael Bennet of Colorado and Tim Kaine of Virginia dominating the early speculation.

Despite the internal confidence, Clinton won’t enter without substantial concerns and obstacles, some of which are self-evident to her top advisers and are a subject of constant conversation among Democrats during the build-up phase.

The Democratic Party, and its leaders, are going through some public soul-searching after all this electoral excitement. The big, and probably only, question for me is whether Democrats will continue their love affair with Big Money at the expense of The Middle Class or will they start giving priority to those who helped America's economy become the titan it is – the true Job Creators.

Senators like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are clearly on the side of The Middle Class. 

Michael Bennet has been eerily silent since the election. He's surely playing it safe and hoping not to kill any of this flattering VP talk. But his history and his path don't tell of someone who has the same concern for those in the middle of our economy as he does for those at the top of the heap who are on his Favorites list. Can he even contemplate the policies being proposed by Sanders and Warren? Would he dare support any of them?

Michael Bennet, and his benefactors, are going to have to make a critical choice soon about continuing that decades-long affair with 1%-er Democrats at the expense of a declining Middle Class. Those Middle Classers can't afford big campaign donations, and have been less than enthusiastic about voting for a class of Democratic politicians who think they have no where else to go on election day. But even though they don't have the money, they've freely given their votes to Democrats without asking too much in return.

That ask is getting bigger lately, and elected Democrats will have to come up with satisfactory answers that address rising inequality, the effects of austerity on the world's economies, and the base assumptions about who our economy should protect and serve. Those answers need to come sooner, rather than later, and should spell out how the richest among us can start paying their fair share again while taking the load off the hardest working Middle Class on the planet. No joke.

About Zappatero

Just a guy with a keyboard trying to get CO's Dems to support key Democratic and Progressive policies.

6 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. CDW says:

    It's a losing proposition. But definitely a possibility.  I will have to hold my nose to vote for Hillary, and adding Bennet to the deal will very likely be a deal breaker for me.  Can't stand the man.

    • BlueCat says:

      This is why it's such a bad idea. Won't bring any constituency that HRC doesn't already have and will further reduce enthusiasm of Dem base voters. Don't even see it doing anything to improve the chances for winning Colorado. The only part I like is that, if successful, his seat would be available for our Dem Governor to fill via appointment. Hick could take the op to fill it with someone like Romanoff who's centrist enough for Hick and the DLC crowd yet is somehow also wildly popular with the base who see him as a great progressive champion. Fine.

      While Romanoff is a weak candidate in any competitive situation, he's a good legislator. Once appointed he might actually be able to get himself subsequently elected. I would, however, much prefer the Bennet seat to become vacant via a Bennet appointment to some cabinet or other post.

  2. Progressicat says:

    I won't get to pick a nominee next year (I disaffiliated), but my money is on Clinton/Patrick.  Governor, Obama bud (to bring those folks along), single mom-raised in the projects, and business cred too.

  3. mamajama55 says:

    If Bennet is consistent, his next political job will be an appointed one. He is competent at governance, but not an inspiring figure. He is also way too friendly to his BFFs in the finance industry.

    When he was plucked out of corporate dealmaking, and appointed as DPS Superintendent, he reinforced the ideay that, to reform education, one has to ignore teachers and spend millions on high priced curricula that don't meet the needs of the majority f DPS students.

    He made a deal to pay off DPS retirement debt by borrowing money to consolidate it with PERA, and we're still feeling the consequences of that bad deal today. Typical Bennet move; make a flashy deal, then move on before feeling any personal pain from it.

    Then, appointed as Senator to fill Salazar's seat in 2009, he was a  vote for whatever Obama wanted – which I guess included "no public option" on Obamacare. He's been a fairly reliable liberal to moderate voter and certainly better than WhattheBuck, but my enthusiasm for him is also moderate. His latest greatest is an inexplicable vote for the Keystone pipeline, which does absolutely nothing for Colorado, but would make the Kochs richer at the expense of taxpayers who would build free infrastructure for them. 

    If it's a joke, it's not even slightly funny.

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.