Someone needs to get to the boss and urge him to get off the fence and start acting like a true Democrat. His friend and colleague Mark Udall, whom he has such great respect for, just got his ass handed to him. This was most likely due to Udall's inability to project, or fear of showing, support for significant Democratic and progressive principles.
And I think we can all see that a flurry of campaign ads trying to paint a more vivid picture cannot make up for years of political mush.
If your boss really wants a new term, though sometimes I quite doubt this, then he'll need to get off the fence and take firm stands in support of the Middle Class. He'll need to take firm stands in support of workers. He'll need to piss off a few of his friends in high finance.
Voters don't care if a bill is bipartisan. Voters don't first look to the vote count, they look to the principles of a bill and its intended effect. And I truly believe they understand many of the intricacies of how things get done, or don't, in our nation's capital.
Many think political moderation, while Republicans act more and more reactionary (how can you negotiate with political bomb throwers?) and some timely Clinton coattails guarantee the senator another term.
I disagree.
Voters may not vote a straight party line. Political trends are easily disturbed within this volatile electorate. Critical endorsements often lack common sense or are based on lies. And as Harry Truman said, for a president, "When a fellow tells me he's bipartisan, I know he's going to vote against me." And for a Democrat, "Given the choice between a Republican and someone who acts like a Republican, people will vote for the real Republican all the time."
Your friend Mark Udall is a perfect example of this truth.
The Senator would do well to heed both quotes, for they are still relevant today. And he would do well to not take the wrong lessons from this last election: Voters don't want more conservative Democrats, they want Democrats who'll stand for something.
Sincerely,
Zappatero
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Coloradans Getting Impatient with Trump Destruction of Public Lands
BY: harrydoby
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Friday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Thanks, Zappatero, for your thoughtful comments. I happen to believe you are spot-on. If Sen. Bennet continues to turn his back on working families in support of his friends on Wall Street, he can kiss his re-election hopes good-bye. I'm to the point where I would rather cede a House or Senate seat to a Republican than vote for another "limousine liberal" who doesn't represent my interests. It just happened to Udall. Michael Bennet is next.
Senator Both Ways Bob Beauprez. Sounds sorta nice. Better than Cowboy Bob. Maybe Senator Mike Coffman. Amazin Senator Don Maes.
It's all adding up. Bennet should just resign now – he doesn't have a chance with supporters like Colorado D's.
I'm thinking Senator Buck. If he can be talked into that, there's no downside for the Republicans. He ran close to Bennett last time. Gardner's shown they way, keep your head down for a couple of years, obey your masters, smile, lie like a motherfucker . . .
Buck's missteps from that last Senatorial run will be long forgotten and without any impact.. From the party's standpoint there's absolutely no downside if he loses; one of Brophy's smaller melons could now run and be elected in the 4th given its makeup and the Dems historical efforts there.
As for Bennet resigning now, there might be some wisdom in your MADness(CO) — maybe that should be explored?. If he's not going to do jack shit for two years, why not? At least with the advantage of some short period of incumbency, could any Hickenlooper appointee have less prospect of building a chance of winning?