President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) J. Sonnenberg

(R) Ted Harvey

20%↑

15%↑

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Doug Bruce

20%

20%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

40%↑

20%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 05, 2014 03:43 PM UTC

Real Irony in Our Colorado Solar Fight

  • 6 Comments
  • by: catpuzzle

Oops. If I were the folks at Xcel, that's what I'd be saying. For the last year they've been trying to get rid of net metering here in Colorado (just like other utilitiesand the Koch brothers – have been trying to do nationally). 

Well it turns out, according to this press release from the solar folks, that just a few years ago Xcel was happy to make the case for solar: 

Last week in Denver, Coloradans packed into the Public Utilities Commission meeting rooms to support the cornerstone rooftop solar policy net metering.  Meanwhile, a new finding shows that Xcel also knows the true benefits of net metering.  A Denver Post article from 2007 says "Xcel officials maintain that all customers benefit because solar systems delay the need to build expensive power plants and reduce prospective future taxes on carbon emissions from fossil-fuel power." Xcel's current attacks on net metering are a flip-flop meant to protect the utility monopoly from competition.

Right there, Xcel is admitting that rooftop solar and net metering systems actually help the grid – exactly the opposite of what they're arguing now. And they're making the case using the kinds of points about expanding the cost analysis (i.e. including the cost of building huge new expensive power plants) that they're rejecting now. 

Oops, indeed. 

I tracked down the original DP story. Here's a link to it for anyone interested. It's really worth a read, as it walks through Xcel execs making the case about everything that's great about rooftop solar. Quite a change of heart they've had. For instance, in a more recent piece in the post, they say:

"We believe that net metering is a hidden incentive that unfairly requires non-solar customers to pay the grid costs of solar customers," Alice Jackson, a vice president of Xcel's Colorado subsidiary, said in an e-mail.

What's with the change of heart? The solar folks in that article lay it on competition, and that's probably a bit part of it. But the old quote from Xcel is important not just as a gotcha moment: it should force the company to accept cost projections that take into account the other social costs of dirty coal and gas power they're using, compared to solar, and to account for the upfront costs of big infrastructure investments in power plants (which are also passed along to consumers). After all, they're the ones who made the case for it. 

 

 

Comments

6 thoughts on “Real Irony in Our Colorado Solar Fight

  1. That does seem to be the latest electrical utility talking point- solar providers are "selfish" and want to be "subsidized" by consumers. So unfair!

    This totally ignores the subsidies oil and gas production get via low tax rates and tax credits. But if you put solar on your roof, you're totally a rate sucker. That's what Black Hills Energy's VP apologist said, anyway (about 34 minutes in). It's how they justify a crazy rate structure that makes commercial solar installations pay 3X more than conventional electrical rates.

    I think this might be Rovian logic, or something. It's bizarro world, anyway.

  2. Where is Warren Buffet?, in addition, the history of Excel, the transformation from the Public Service company, which probably had a 2-3% stock return on investment, to a privatised REI of 8%. What was Ex guv Bill Owens role (it was on his tenure )this transfer took place? I've heard Colorado is the largest profit garnering state for Excel, and correspondingly, mega stock holders who give to the other party elite.

     I am reminded of Raph Naders strange titled book, "Only Billionaires can save us" It is time for legacy minded, "give back to the people" such as Warren Buffett to wrest control of these midwestern "power for profit"  corp boardrooms with a mere stock purchase of 5-10% to dampen down the wholesale fleecing of the middle class. Huge economic boost to put said Dollars back into the pockets of consumers

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

139 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!