U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser

60%↑

50%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) David Seligman

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) J. Danielson

(R) Sheri Davis
50%

40%

30%
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(D) Jeff Bridges

(R) Kevin Grantham

40%

40%

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(R) H. Scheppelman

(D) Alex Kelloff

70%

30%

10%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Trisha Calvarese

(D) Eileen Laubacher

90%

20%

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Manny Rutinel

(D) Shannon Bird

45%↓

30%

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
June 30, 2014 06:11 AM UTC

Monday Open Thread

  • 30 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

"The longer we dwell on our misfortunes, the greater is their power to harm us."

–Voltaire

Comments

30 thoughts on “Monday Open Thread

      1. Widespread panic of Republican Party insiders everywhere.

        The Tea Party radicals they set loose are not giong away any time soon – just listen to their true leaders any morning or afternoon (or any of their 24×7 replays on any number of radio stations around the state) for about 15-30 minutes. Levin, Savage, Rush, and local yokels like Richard Randall and Jeff Crank in the Springs , are all relentlessly attacking those who were good, upstanding* members of their own party just months ago.

        I actually think this is a good thing because those solid Republican voters are finally seeing huge duplicity of the Southern Strategy's focus on largely phony social/tax issues vs. the extreme, almost exclusive, priority of DC R's in aiding and protecting the 1%. (You don't see McConnell, Cantor, Boner naming any Corporate Welfare Queens like Blackwater, do you?)

        BUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        Dems need to be careful and not over-pander to a voting bloc that sees them as, and hears them described as, these fear inducing names every day by the very same people. socialist, communist, collectivist, Bolshevik traitor, gun grabber, taker, and on and on…..The fear induced hatred of your every day, traditional Democrat is something that may never go away and will probably always prevent these types from voting for anyone with a (D) behind their name.

        1. Sorry, Z, I think you are whistling in the dark.  There is an ongoing debate within the republican party between the teaparty and the establishment repubs.  However, there does seem to be agreement that in Colorado, they are a united party……Gardner has teaparty and establishment support….

          If you listen to Corporon, who is a tea party chair or whatever they are called, he conducts ongoing conversations on his show about whether to support Beauprez or not.  He is civil and they do discuss all kinds consequences to whom the teaparty supports for governor.

          The results of republican party primaries is mixed.  Lindsey Graham easily beat back a tea party opponent as did McConnell in Kentucky…..Woods and Sanchez were both tea party candidates who won their primaries …..they both had a good ground game.   

    1. . . . of course they do.

      It used to be more OT:  "I got mine, fuck 'em."

      These NT days, it's:  "I got mine, fuck 'em — and let me do whatever I want."

  1. Anyone see the new crying baby full page anti-Polis ad from Log Cabin Rs in the paper?  What a coincidence that, once again, the job of criticizing our openly gay congressman seems to have been assigned to the Republican gay organization. While the base loathes them, anti-gay stances are part of the party platform and hardly a day goes by that a mainstream high profile Republican doesn't compare their "condition" to being an alcoholic or pervert and their "lifestyle" a threat to good Christian American families, they're still game to allow themselves to be used by those who despise them.  The one thing the GOTP apparently thinks they're good for is attacking gay Dem pols. Hey, it's not homophobic, folks. Look. It's coming from teh gays. 

    Apparently the only folks who loath Log Cabin Republicans more than the GOTP base are the Log Cabin Republicans themselves. Please accept us and let us attend all those cool conservative events even though we're gay. If you do we'll specialize in lending credibility to attacks on gay Dems for you. We'll even use a crying baby as a substitute for "sissy" but people will get the picture. And even if you ban us from cool events, we won't give up. On the rare occasions when you condescend to using us we'll be there for you with bells on. Unless you think that's too gay. 

    The idea that the Log Cabin Republicans have more credibility attacking Polis is a joke. They have no more credibility than an organization called Gefilte Fish Neo Nazis would have attacking Jewish pols. Cringing self loathing is such a universal turn off. And BTW, what the heck does a log cabin have to do with being gay? Guess they hope low info votes will just think they're Republicans who really like Lincoln. Maybe because of the rumors?

      1. Why limit it to Meesa County, Ralphie. Every lower-middle class voter who goes 3for the GOTP because it "shares our values" is voting agaisnt their own self-interests.

        1. Because it's especially true in Mesa County, where straight-ticket GOP voters have given us Josh "Here, have our water!" Penry, Scooter "Can I copy from your paper?" McGinnis, Jared "Honest.. I didn't know it was wrong!" Wright, and Steve King. ( I don't have the heart to think up a snarky slogan for him…yet.) 

        2. Why limit it to lower middle class? If you aren't in the top .1% and you vote Republican you're voting against your own economic interests. That includes those merely in the lower echelons of the top 1%, nobodies as far as the real power elite is concerned. 

  2. Started boycotting Hobby Lobby years ago  – not that it seemed to hurt them $$-wise one bit.  Still it made me feel better; never more than today. 

    1. I won't shop anywhere that's closed on Sunday, not for lack of business, but, for their personal religious beliefs.Besides, if the full-page ads are any indication, the place is lousy with cheesy religiously-themed crap from China. Not my cuppa'. 

      1. Yep…full of crap from China for people who have more time on their hands than do I.

        I will say, they some very hard to find things ( I was in there once looking for something), but they have competitors. Just go to Michaels.

            1. Really? I didn't know that, but I'm not terribly surprised. I almost never shop in those stores since my "hobby" involves guitars and microphones. There are usually give-a-ways you notice when you do business in stores.

              I had lunch with a friend yesterday, in a locally owned place I haven't been in in a couple of years. I noticed they had added to the decor by placing Broncos football jerseys in large frames and hanging them on the wall…sort of "hall of fame"-ish.

              The great ones were there…Elway…Floyd Little…like that. And, lo and behold, there right next to Terrell Davis…Tim Tebow.

              Do you think that says anything about the owners of that joint?

              I do.

  3. Sad, but unsurprising, commentary about the state of "news reporting":

    Why I Left 60 Minutes

    With a third fewer commercial journalists than 20 years ago and public relations “spinners” now outnumbering professional reporters and editors by 4 to 1, the Center for Public Integrity and organizations like it are more necessary than ever. Fewer commercial news organizations support investigative journalism now than at any time in recent history, and reporters today—especially those who aggressively seek the truths that government, business and other powerful institutions seek to conceal—are arguably more alone, more exposed and more vulnerable to professional and even physical harm than they ever were.

    There has to be a better way.

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/06/chuck-lewis-60-minutes-108415_Page4.html#ixzz369tsD2EU

  4. This just in early birds…fracktivists, take note.

    New York top court OKs local gas-drilling bans.

     

     

    ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — New York's top court handed a victory to opponents of hydraulic fracturing for natural gas Monday by affirming the right of municipalities to ban the practice within their borders.

    The state Court of Appeals upheld a midlevel appeals court ruling from last year that said the state oil and gas law doesn't trump the authority of local governments to control land use through zoning.

    The "fracking" cases from two central New York towns have been closely watched by drillers hoping to tap into the state's piece of the Marcellus Shale formation and by environmentalists who fear water and air pollution.

    Both sides are still waiting to see whether a statewide moratorium on fracking in effect since July 2008 will be lifted.

    The court in a 5-2 decision stressed that it did not consider the merits of fracking, only the authority of municipalities to regulate land use. The court said the towns of Dryden and Middlefield both acted properly.

    "The towns both studied the issue and acted within their home rule powers in determining that gas drilling would permanently alter and adversely affect the deliberately-cultivated, small-town character of their communities," according to the majority ruling by Judge Victoria Graffeo.

     

    http://news.yahoo.com/york-top-court-oks-local-gas-drilling-bans-132730530.html

    1. Good news, and I think that the court took an approach that will fit Colorado communities…"the court in a 5-2 decision stressed that it did not consider the merits of fracking, only the authority of municipalities to regulate land use"

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

100 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!

Colorado Pols