U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez
(D) George Stern
(R) Sheri Davis
50%↑
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
April 07, 2014 03:53 PM UTC
12 Comments
Isn't money in politics a bad thing, libs?
You are truly the perfect shill.
I guess that depends on what the money looks like. $2m in under $200 donations is impressive and entirely grassroots – it's the way the system should work. $2m in $2600 individual donations not as impressive but still okay. $2m in $5000 PAC donations is not "people-driven". $30m in third-party campaign ads is IMHO asking for trouble.
That's what made Obama's first run (and to a lesser extend second campaign) so impressive – his campaign had a broad-based grassroots donation base that kept pace with the much more PAC and max contributor oriented Republican fundraising machine.
Except when it's a Repug, obviously.
Yes it is. And it sucks that Udall has to spend half his waking hours begging for money. But at present it's the only way to win.
Apparently you don't think so, modster. Dems aren't going to accommodate you by fighting with one hand tied behind their backs. You're the ones who say money is speech. Since you want it to be about which candidate's money shouts the loudest, don't expect Dems to whisper sweet nothings. You really are lousy at this, aren't you?
I'm not lousy. You are inconsistent.
I just live in the reality based world. Money out of politics would be nice but where your side spends a million I want my side to spend two. Or ten. Got a problem with that?
I want the best candidate that money can buy.
It's wrong to try to buy a politician. It's much more cost effective just to sub-lease their votes one-term at a time for the issues that really matter to you. With proper condominiumization in place, hundreds of special interests can own they votes they want on the issues they care about, paying a fraction of the full cost of a politician while the politician can receive two or three times as much money as he'd get by selling all his votes. Think of it as inspired by the time-share condos in Vail.
Con Man Cory is about the become a Koch whore….he needs the cash and will do and say anything for a "fix"…
He won't be breaking much new ground there. He has been a COGA whore for a long time. Same position….different John.