CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

50%↑

15%

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Dave Williams

55%↑

45%↓

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

40%↑

20%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 03, 2014 11:08 AM UTC

Amy Stephens Makes National Lists...for Ineptitude

  • 12 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
You can't run a Senate campaign with pocket lint.
You can’t run a Senate campaign with pocket lint.

UPDATE: From a press release sent out by the Colorado Democratic Party:

[A]ccording to Roll Call, Amy Stephens' $51k was beaten by 150 out of 166 House candidates in high profile races around the country who raised in the third quarter of 2013. 

—–

If you missed the news on Friday, it was by design. Colorado Republican Senate candidates quietly reported their fundraising numbers on Friday, hoping against hope that nobody would notice. There's a truism in politics that you save bad news for Friday afternoons, and that was definitely the plan for Ken Buck, Owen Hill, and Amy Stephens.

We'll break down all of the fundraising reports in a later post, but the last quarter was particularly awful for Stephens, who laid a bigger egg than the Broncos on Sunday. In her first fundraising quarter as a candidate for Senate, Stephens raised $51,000. Yes, you read that correctly. $51,000. For a U.S. Senate campaign.

To put that in perspective, Stephens was outraised by Democrat Irv Halter, who brought in $55k in his second fundraising quarter as a candidate for CD-5 (Rep. Doug Lamborn). No Democrat has come close to winning the solidly-Republican CD-5, yet Halter would appear to have more support in his darkhorse bid than Stephens could find in a weak Republican field for Senate. Stephens' poor numbers caught the eye of national political news outlets such as Politico:

Stephens, a former Colorado House majority leader, is seen by some in the the GOP establishment as their best hope of knocking off Democratic Sen. Mark Udall. But in the fourth quarter she raised a measly $51,000. Udall, meanwhile, brought in $1.1 million and has $4.7 million on hand.

Stephens’s poor performance is bound to raise fears among the chunk of Republicans who fear Ken Buck, a former Weld County district attorney who waged a disastrous, gaffe-prone 2010 Senate campaign, will again be the nominee. Buck raised $154,000 last quarter.

Ugh. Note also how Politico categorizes Buck's 2010 Senate campaign as "disastrous."

Even the conservative press can't help but criticize Stephens. Here's what "The Hotline" (National Journal) had to say in calling Stephens one of the fundraising quarter's big losers:

Stephens has gotten some buzz as a Republican who could mount a real challenge to Democratic Sen. Mark Udall if she could win the GOP primary–no easy task, given that she sponsored the legislation creating a state health care exchange. But her fourth-quarter totals (her first in the race) were far from impressive: She raised just $51,000, a paltry sum particularly considering Udall's $4.7 million war chest. She'll have to do much better than that to get past 2010 GOP nominee Ken Buck in the primary, let alone take on Udall.

Stephens has been claiming that the NRSC preferred her candidacy to those of Buck and Owens, but it's hard to see how national Republicans could still feel positive about a candidate who had such a terrible quarter. As we've said time and time again, early money indicates support, and Stephens is clearly lacking a base of backers. Stephens says she has a new fundraising committee hard at work, but at this point time is as much an enemy as her empty bank account; she's going to need hundreds of thousands of dollars just to petition onto the Primary ballot in June, let alone money to operate her campaign or buy time on television. If it is true that the the NRSC once preferred Stephens, they are likely now having conversations about whether they should even bother with trying to unseat incumbent Sen. Mark Udall.

 

Comments

12 thoughts on “Amy Stephens Makes National Lists…for Ineptitude

  1. So we should compare Republican fundraising numbers in primary season to how things are going at Team Udall recently:

    1) Caught with his hand in the cookie jar trying to change the numbers of people who he lied to when he told them he could keep their policies if they wanted to.

    2) Waffling with national press at State of the Union speech about whether he will be joined in his campaign by the unpopular Fearless Leader.

    3) His kid gets picked up with heroin in his possession.

    Not exactly hitting things our of the park at Team Udall.

    1. Did all that silly spin make you dizzy?

      As long as the GOP puts up pathetic candidates and/or pathetic fundraising numbers, your shilling will continue to be a souce of amusement 🙂

    2. None of it is relevant. This is about support demonstrated by fund raising. You can't seriously believe Amy has a snowball's chance in hell.  Not in the primary. Not in the general. And your attempt at mudslinging via Udall's son is pathetic. 50 years ago a scandal in the family could still derail a candidate's chances but those days are long gone. Too many pols on both sides of the aisle have problematic siblings and children these days. Nobody cares except people who would never vote for the pol in question in the first place.

      The only reason I believe you are not a paid troll is because you so obviously don't know WTF you're talking about in the world of politics. Who would be stupid enough to pay you? I believe you're just another mindless Borg member, spitting out what the rightie spin machine spoon feeds you.

      1. It is a story about a press release put out by the Colorado State Democratic party and the Senate race.  They obviously want to dump on the Republican who is running against Udall.  How Udall is doing during the last quarter, while understandably not something that brings happiness to the Polsters, is relevant.

    3. Correcting half truths about health insurance is tantamount to being " caught with your hand in the cookie jar."

      My god that is so fucking stupid. 

  2. I find unlikely that Stephens will get through the primary; the GOP primaries have a way of eating their own, and her vote in support of the healthcare exchange isn't going to do here in favors. 

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

56 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!