As we reported, the last days of this year's session of the Colorado General Assembly saw a rush of activity on several bills aimed at easing Coloradans' concern about the increasing impacts of oil and gas development. After a multi-million dollar lobby effort by the oil and gas industry (and the "help" of Governor John Hickenlooper), many of these bills died in the waning days of the session. But the repercussions of these battles still simmer, and the controversy around drilling and fracking near Colorado homes and schools is nowhere near resolved.
We should note, however, that the industry seemed to at least partially wake up to the facts: simply relying on Governor Hickenlooper to kill any proposal they don't like is not playing well with the public in affected communities. Colorado Oil and Gas Association's Tisha Schuller embarked on a not so secret publicity tour promising more listening sessions and even including diverse voices at their annual conference.
While the tour generated some good press, it didn't take long for drilling controversies to quickly heat up. In Greeley, the heart of drilling activity in the Wattenberg Field, citizens pushed back on the idea of new wells in their neighborhoods. Meanwhile, local governments continued to resist allowing fracking within their borders–both the City of Boulder and Boulder County renewed drilling moratoriums.
More evidence that local governments were still very much engaged in oil and gas issues can be found in a letter sent last month from over 100 current and former local elected officials, asking Governor Hickenlooper for an "improved approach to addressing oil and gas development in Colorado."
We are concerned that the State’s positions do not adequately address the growing outcry from our citizens who are concerned about the health and safety of their families, the livability of neighborhoods, and the long-term economic vitality of our communities.
As the Colorado Independent's Andrea Tudhope reported in June:
La Plata County Commissioner Gwen Lachelt spearheaded the effort urging colleagues throughout the state to sign onto three letters and an email that made it to the desks of Chief Strategy Officer Alan Salazar and Hickenlooper on Wednesday.
“Oil and gas is an important part of our economy, but we can’t have it at the expense of our water and air quality,” said Lachelt, longtime activist and founder of Earthworks’ Oil & Gas Accountability Project.
In the letters, officials express a pressing need for a new approach to oil and gas development, one that will support health and safety and promote research to ensure long-term protection for Colorado communities.
According to Lachelt, Hickenlooper has consistently lobbied against a number of bills proposing to research and effectively minimize the environmental and overall health impacts of oil and gas development. One such measure, proposed by State Representative Joann Ginal, would have initiated a study about the impact of oil and gas extraction on human health.
Read the full letter here. It outlines local government's frustration with the prioritization of a single industry over the interests of Coloradans–particularly when the industry only consists of 1.2 percent of total Colorado jobs, and only generated approximately 2.3 percent of total personal income in the state. The signers correctly point out that "neither the state nor one industry should be able to control a community's right to determine its future."
State Representatives have also continued the drumbeat as they respond to ongoing constituent concerns. Rep. Mike Foote (D-Lafayette), who saw a number of proposed oil and gas legislative efforts stymied by the power of the oil and gas industry, summed up many Coloradans feelings in a recent op-ed: if industry "the industry continues to say 'no,' (to more protections), the people of Colorado will say 'no' to oil and gas."
"Until Coloradans have confidence that the oil and gas industry is behaving responsibly in our state, and under strict environmental safeguards, we will see this dynamic continue. Building public confidence by setting and enforcing high standards will not only protect the environment and people's health and safety, it will also protect the livelihoods of the Coloradans who work in the industry."
We have written at length about the political ramifications in Colorado and nationally of Governor Hickenlooper blatantly siding with the oil and gas industry over concerned Coloradans (and fellow Democrats). As we've said before, for all of the victories Democrats enjoyed this legislative session, this issue isn't going away–and stands out in sharper relief as the successes in other areas pile up.
At the end of the letter, signers ask for a meeting and to hear back from the Governor on their concerns. We understand as of this writing, full two months later, a response has yet to be received. In our opinion, this is an opportunity the Governor shouldn't ignore–a chance to address his biggest long-term political liability.
Long after the brouhaha over gun control or the death penalty has subsided, this issue will remain front and center.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Marla Robbinson
IN: Apparently Everyone Is Wrong Except For Gabe Evans
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Powerful Pear
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Powerful Pear
IN: Get More Smarter Roundup for Thursday (May 15)
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Monday on HBO, the film that industry is already spending massive cash on trying to discredit…
GASLAND PART II Teaser Trailer #1 from JFOX on Vimeo.
Josh was on " the Daily Show" last night. He did a great job.
Protect our beer, Governor. From the Real Beer Newsletter:
Great sentiments, which I fully share….but, a total waste of time. Gov. Frackenlooper WILL NOT cross his O&G buddies and benefactors. Watch for some serious friction in the next session of the Colo. legislature.
I'm hoping the high-tech businesses get involved too. We need a nice environment here to attract employees as they can work anywhere. Trashing the environment will hurt a lot of businesses here.
We need clean water and air and communities free of toxins to raise our families. Attracting a workforce is nice, but its hardly the purpose behind regulation. Colorado doesn't want to be China, Texas, Oklahoma and Calaragry's energy colony.
Attracting a workforce will get industries like the high-tech sector involved out of self interest. And that is a very powerful motivator.
They are not mutually exclusive. But a healthy environment is a more primary necessity.
As is usually the case, David, it will take a significant coalition to affect any change in a state government so inappropriately influenced by the O&G lobby. To hear them tell it, the Colorado economy will tank if they are forced to play by honest, responsible rules that protect other Colorado stakeholders from the awful intrusion of the nasty, oily bunch.
They lie and exaggerate with such unrelenting regularity that many people believe they are essential to this states' economy…they are not. We can easily survive without them.
They are unwilling to fairly do business in this state, so let them go. We need responsible industries in this state to make our future a clean, healthy one. The oil and gas industry, as it does business in Colorado (and really, everywhere I know of) is decidedly NOT a responsible player. They leave a trail of pollution, destruction, and sickness everywhere they go.
We do not need O&G development in Colorado. We need to lead the nation in converting to local, sustainable, energy solutions…not in subsidizing the wealth of an already bloated, corrupt industry.
Mark Jaffe at The Paper Which Shall Remain Nameless (TPWSRN) has picked this up on his blog – currently front-paged on the Politics blog section of their website.
(I'm not sure of the current status of Pols' prohibition on links to TPWSRN…)