CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 25, 2012 07:00 PM UTC

Labuda Outraising Houck in HD-1 Primary

  • 4 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Incumbent State Representative Jeanne Labuda has over six times more cash-on-hand than her upstart primary opponent Corrie Houck, according to finance reports released earlier this month.

While Labuda had an anemic fundraising period by most standards – she raised only about $2,300 – her opponent did even worse, raising a hair over $1,600.

Houck clearly hasn’t been able to connect with donors, given she’s only brought in $3,600 since she kicked off her campaign. For her part, Labuda’s raised over $9,000 – a relatively paltry sum, but significant when compared to her challenger’s haul.

With the June primary fast approaching, Houck’s in a bad spot. Labuda has a full $8,000 to spend over the next month, compared to just $1,200 for her opponent. With such a gigantic fundraising gap to leap, Houck’s path to victory is obstructed, at the very least. Simply put, Corrie Houck had to raise more money than her opponent in order to stay competitive. Sure, the incumbent has made crippling mistakes which could’ve severely hindered her chances of re-election, but those mistakes patently do not matter if voters aren’t aware of them. Houck doesn’t have enough money in the bank to make the case that she’s a better candidate than Labuda. She certainly doesn’t have enough to raise her name ID to a point where voters will pick her over the candidate for whom they’ve voted three times before.

Beyond that, Houck’s terrible fundraising also betrays her entire justification for challenging Labuda in the first place. Houck staged a primary campaign, in part, because of complaints about Labuda’s deficiencies as a campaigner. Yet if Labuda is able to outraise Houck by such large margins, doesn’t that mean she’s probably the better candidate for the general election?

Still, Houck’s challenge has certainly made Labuda nervous. The incumbent representative has spent about $12,500 — $3,500 more than she’s raised. That’s nearly four times as much money as Houck has spent. Perhaps the person most confident in Corrie Houck winning the race, then, is Jeanne Labuda: why else would she spend such incredible amounts of money against an opponent who hasn’t even proven her credibility? To make up for her difference in money raised and money spent, Labuda had to give herself a $7,500 loan. While a loan is nominally different than donating money to yourself, it still opens up Labuda to the criticism that she’s willing to buy a fourth term of office.

It’s a shame, then, that Corrie Houck doesn’t have enough cash-on-hand to air that criticism.

Comments

4 thoughts on “Labuda Outraising Houck in HD-1 Primary

  1. Maybe my math skills are fuzzy but using the figures in your article above:

    Incumbent Cash on Hand: $9,000

    Incumbent Loan to Self:     $7,500

    Difference:                          $1,500

    Hmmmmm……………

    1. Without the Loan, Labuda would have about the same amount of cash on hand as Houck. There’s no question that Labuda has been hemorrhaging money to stave off the challenge — she had to loan herself $7,500, after all.

      The fact of the matter is that she did loan herself that money. Cash on hand is cash on hand no matter where it comes from; Labuda’s loan enables her to spend money that Corrie Houck simply can’t.

      Labuda has a gigantic burn rate, of course. But she can afford to waste money in part because of this loan and in part because she’s raised so much more money than her opponent.

      If Corrie Houck were serious about winning this seat, she should’ve raised more than $3,600.  

  2. Once again Labuda does nothing to win an election.  She uses her own money to buy campaign workers since she can’t get anyone to help her.  Look over the past election filings and you will see that she does this over and over.  She buys elections instead of connecting face to face with her constituents.  At least Houck is walking and knocking on doors.  She may not win, but she can hold her head high.  

    1. Stated like someone with no clue about her campaign. Well done!

       Rep. Labuda ran a “walking” campaign, complete with volunteers. Houck can walk home with her tail between her legs for illegally posting signage in public right-of-ways.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

207 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!