Folks, we’ve said it before and we’ll say it again: negative campaigns generally influence voters in more ways than the electorate is willing to admit. Voters say they don’t like the mudslinging, but they unfailingly admit in polls and focus group that it does work.
Mayoral candidate Michael Hancock wants to make an issue out of it, however:
Denver mayoral candidate Michael Hancock today challenged fellow candidate Chris Romer to stop planning for a negative political campaign and instead promise voters he will run the kind of clean campaign Denver voters expect and deserve.
Romer’s campaign has hired a Tennessee-based research company, and this week an opposition research consultant for the company requested government records for Councilman Hancock and Councilwoman Carol Boigon, who also is running for mayor.
If your opponent looks like he may possibly be digging up dirt on you, it’s never a good idea to call attention to it via press release. All this does is make reporters wonder what it is that Romer might be looking for. Hancock is clearly trying to paint Romer as a negative campaigner, but is that really worth the downside to such an approach?
The other problem with a press release like this is the unspoken message that it sends. Calling attention to something that Chris Romer’s campaign might be doing tends to give off the impression that you think Romer is the frontrunner. After all, nobody takes wild swings at opponents who are behind them.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Marla Robbinson
IN: Apparently Everyone Is Wrong Except For Gabe Evans
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Powerful Pear
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Powerful Pear
IN: Get More Smarter Roundup for Thursday (May 15)
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Hancock attacks Romer for researching his “government records” and public votes? Isn’t it important for candidates to know where their opponents stand on important city issues? And aren’t these “government records” public anyhow. What does Hancock have to hide? It’s not like Chris was digging through the Councilman’s trash.
Also, the irony of Hancock attacking Romer by calling on him to not attack others is pretty funny. Plus, there have to be other campaigns that have hired similar firms (Will someone with more time on their hands look into the other candidates campaign finance reports? I’d start with the big spenders: Mejia, Boigon, and Hancock. If Hancock has hired a similar firm I’ll actually die laughing).
If there’s a single campaign in the race that isn’t researching the “government records” and votes of the other candidates, now that would be news worthy! I’d also dub that campaign manager an idiot.