CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 03, 2013 11:31 AM UTC

With Obama in town, will reporters please go the extra mile to correct GOP misinformation on guns?

  • 8 Comments
  • by: Jason Salzman

(Please? – promoted by Colorado Pols)

In an editorial Monday, titled "Sour Grapes in the Colorado Legislature," The Denver Post wondered whether the GOP's hard feelings over gun legislation was spilling over, tantrum-like, into opposition to funding the entire state governement.

The Post spotlighted Sen. Kent Lambert's March 28 assertion that lawmakers had "effectively banned gun ownership."

Labert's statement, The Post said, was "not supported by the facts."

It's not a very complicated fact check to make, but, still, it's worth 1) praising The Post for spotlighting out Lambert's misinformation and 2) pointing out again that Republican legislators, not just fee-wheeling talk-show hosts, have been repeatedly making stuff up about Colorado's gun bills, or exaggerating to such a wild degree it's an embarrassment to representative government.

For example, a week before making his statement that was corrected by The Post, Lambert went even further asking an eager KVOR radio host:

Lambert: And now, you know, with everybody having their guns confiscated or taken away here over the next couple years, almost completely overturning the Second Amendment, what’s going to happen to our crime rate?

Recall that at Denver University debate in January, State Sen. Randy Baumgardner tried to push the misinformation that "hammers and bats" killed more people in America last year than guns did (See video at 24:23.), even though a thinking person would require only a minute to know that's false.

Who can forget that State Rep. Kevin Priola, a Republican, during one debate at the Colorado Capitol, compared banning some ammunition magazines to putting Japanese-Americans in internment camps during WWII.

Then there was Rep. Kevin Lundberg, who said on the radio that in Colorado, it's getting "so close" to the point where he'll be having his gun pried away from his "cold, dead hands."

There are more examples like these, obviously, and reporters, generally, are looking the other way.

I'm hoping, with the President in town today, the media will have the dignity to call out Republican elected officials if they level this kind of hyperbole or misinformation.

Comments

8 thoughts on “With Obama in town, will reporters please go the extra mile to correct GOP misinformation on guns?

      1. No, I continue to explain that it is B.S., but the echo chamber is louder than dad.

        I refer to my AWB'94 compliant AR-15 style rifles as Sport Utility Rifles, like the target rifle used by myself and most other competitors in the US National Matches several years ago.

        The gun people give me grief for being a progressive, and the progressive people give me grief for my choice of target rifles…

        1. Wes, as you well know, that rifle is patterned after a rifle designed by the military for the sole purpose of inflicting terrible injuries on people. Yes, they can be (and are) used for target shooting. But let's not pretend that they were designed for that. 

    1. Sport-utility rifles? As in, not a hunting rifle? Is that the new, sanitized way of saying assault rifle? Has that been cleared with Frank Luntz?

       

      1. You know I bet that's exactly where that comes from. Who could object to a sport-utility anything? It's so Eddie Bauer. There are so many ads with such blond people with such white teeth having so much fun and wearing such cool stuff  in sport-utility whatever ads. Blue skies, babbling brooks, floppy eared dogs. Not a pile of  faceless dismembered school kids in sight.

  1. According to ArapG, Lambert isn't lying because if you have paranoid concerns that something might lead to something that could make your statemnt true someday, it's not a lie.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

85 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!